2woody we have discounted all of those.
certainly the tyre compound and tread pattern will have an effect.
Discounted those, if the implication is that grippier tyres tramline more? sc3mo have way more grip have a bigger size in 18' are wider in 245 and lower in 40mm profile. these do not tramline(although they have other shortcomings)
Falken 912 are narrower in 235mm, higher in 45 profile, and are 17". they have way less grip than Sc3 Mo.
YET....its the smaller tyre with less grip that tramlines more.
in order to deflect to absorb the camber, the tyre would really need to be quite soft with a tread pattern able to move around a lot. Pattern a might not be as good as pattern b. then again pattern a when old might be better than pattern b.
Again the problem there for me is, the comparison between sc3 Audi and sc3 Mo (merc) as they both have the EXACT same tread pattern. Compound could well be different though. But the grip level and wear rate seems the same Afaict.
I'm sorry, but all of this comes as no answer for someone with a tramlining car.
While these are all in the tram lining book of legends, and I accept fully they all increase the likely hood of directional stability issues. I have trouble accepting any of them as the one and only cause, or even collectively, given my experiences.
Construction. Perhaps?
Oh another theory on the sc3 Mo/sc3 Ao1 comparison to discuss perhaps. Thinking along the lines of euro style wheels and tyre fitments. Sorry, bare with me.
Take an 8j rim, fit a 235 tyres(ao1). 8j is an inch wider, or at least wider than the oe 17" oe omega wheel. This would give a sidewall shape in profile pointing away from the hub centre.
+
Hub
Centre
\___tread____/
But a wider 245 on the same rim would give more vertical side walls perhaps
+
Hub
Centre
|____Tread_____|
In this case I wonder if the top diag would tram line more...?