I saw on TV that the police have no power to enforce the social distancing rule,so why have it? I must say that while out with the dog today and also while doing my monthly shopping everyone round here still seems to be abiding by the rules.
It's guidance, in the same way as "wash your hands a lot" and "give that handle/ trolley/ etc a wipe down before you use it". If people do it it's expected to reduce the risk.
In an ideal world we wouldn't need to make laws, just pop some guidance out for people to follow until this is all over.
Yes, indeed.
My theory is that the infection / death rates have been lower in some Asian countries due to their populations being more inclined to go with the flock, to do what the authorities tell them all the time, and not express their 'freedoms' as we do in the democratic West.
Democracy, and our history to obtain it often with the British giving their very blood and flesh to get it, means we have learnt to question; to rebel when things seem unjust, and general expressing a greater degree of expressing our freedoms by revolt as and when necessary. Us, the French in particular, and Americans as examples, will participate in a full revolution if our liberties are brought into question. The good people of Hong Kong are trying to follow the democratic tendencies the British gave them, but they are amateurs compared to the French, and under the constant threat of China are struggling to go forward. But their infection rates, like South Korea are lower than ours, so perhaps their is a lesson to be learnt there!