Omega Owners Forum

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  

News:

Search the maintenance guides for answers to 99.999% of Omega questions

Pages: [1] 2  All   Go Down

Author Topic: 04 Omega Bargain? certainly of interest...  (Read 3096 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

05omegav6

  • Guest
04 Omega Bargain? certainly of interest...
« on: 09 February 2011, 19:00:21 »
Saw this at Wilsons of Epsom earlier today:

'04' Omega GLS saloon, in unmarked black. It's a 2.2 manual, 1 owner, 41,000 miles, full dealer history. Up for £3495. Incidently chassis number is 134???. Russelheim was busy in 2003. ;D
« Last Edit: 09 February 2011, 20:16:38 by 05omegav6 »
Logged

Omega_Dan

  • Guest
Re: 04 Omega Bargain
« Reply #1 on: 09 February 2011, 19:02:42 »
Sounds a bit rich to me ;)
Logged

05omegav6

  • Guest
Re: 04 Omega Bargain
« Reply #2 on: 09 February 2011, 19:14:31 »
Perhaps, but they are a main dealer,(for better or worse). :-/
Logged

Omega_Dan

  • Guest
Re: 04 Omega Bargain
« Reply #3 on: 09 February 2011, 19:15:58 »
I suppose Elite spec maybe. nice late model still :y
Logged

Lazydocker

  • Omega Queen
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Woodbridge, Suffolk
  • Posts: 18848
  • Constantly Bullied by a certain Admin
    • View Profile
Re: 04 Omega Bargain
« Reply #4 on: 09 February 2011, 19:53:56 »
I'd pay no more than half that for a GLS spec 4 pot, no matter how new and immaculate it was ::) ::)
Logged
Whatever it is... I didn't do it

Psychoca

  • Senior Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Female
  • Norfolk
  • Posts: 776
    • Beaten up Mondeo TDCI ST.
    • View Profile
Re: 04 Omega Bargain? certainly of interest...
« Reply #5 on: 09 February 2011, 21:44:37 »
Even simpler for me, I won't buy a 4 pot Mig...  IMO they need the bigger more powerful engines to cope with the weight of the car...  The fuel economy is only marginally better than the V6's anyway...
Logged

plym ian

  • Omega Baron
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Plymouth, Devon
  • Posts: 2997
    • 2.0 insignia elite tourer
    • View Profile
Re: 04 Omega Bargain? certainly of interest...
« Reply #6 on: 09 February 2011, 23:01:49 »
Quote
Even simpler for me, I won't buy a 4 pot Mig...  IMO they need the bigger more powerful engines to cope with the weight of the car...  The fuel economy is only marginally better than the V6's anyway...
To true :y
Logged

Vamps

  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Bishop Middleham, Co Durham.
  • Posts: 24708
  • Flying Tonight, so Be Prepared.
    • Mig 2.6CDX and 2.2 Honda
    • View Profile
Re: 04 Omega Bargain? certainly of interest...
« Reply #7 on: 09 February 2011, 23:04:11 »
Quote
Even simpler for me, I won't buy a 4 pot Mig...  IMO they need the bigger more powerful engines to cope with the weight of the car...  The fuel economy is only marginally better than the V6's anyway...


Says a tractor driver... :D :D :D

7 to 15 ish mpg better, and the 2.2 does do 70mph, and if being naughty a little more.... :-X 0 to 60 speed has no interest to me, not since the Mitsubishi Galant was sold.. :'( :'( :'(
Logged

omegabsw

  • Intermediate Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Essex
  • Posts: 312
    • View Profile
Re: 04 Omega Bargain? certainly of interest...
« Reply #8 on: 10 February 2011, 12:46:49 »
Quote
Even simpler for me, I won't buy a 4 pot Mig...  IMO they need the bigger more powerful engines to cope with the weight of the car...  The fuel economy is only marginally better than the V6's anyway...

From a diesel driver?  ::)
Logged

omegabsw

  • Intermediate Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Essex
  • Posts: 312
    • View Profile
Re: 04 Omega Bargain? certainly of interest...
« Reply #9 on: 10 February 2011, 12:47:17 »
Quote
Quote
Even simpler for me, I won't buy a 4 pot Mig...  IMO they need the bigger more powerful engines to cope with the weight of the car...  The fuel economy is only marginally better than the V6's anyway...


Says a tractor driver... :D :D :D

7 to 15 ish mpg better, and the 2.2 does do 70mph, and if being naughty a little more.... :-X 0 to 60 speed has no interest to me, not since the Mitsubishi Galant was sold.. :'( :'( :'(

Beat me to it  ;D
Logged

Seth

  • Omega Lord
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • South Wales Valleys
  • Posts: 6646
  • If there's a 'system' - play it ... !
    • '99 2.5TD GLS Estate
    • View Profile
Re: 04 Omega Bargain? certainly of interest...
« Reply #10 on: 10 February 2011, 12:53:15 »
Logged
Gettin' seriously hacked-off by those who ignore the wisdom of proven experience ... and Forum guidelines.

european bob

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • chippenham wilts
  • Posts: 8
    • View Profile
Re: 04 Omega Bargain? certainly of interest...
« Reply #11 on: 10 February 2011, 12:53:34 »
 paid £370 for a 98 2.5v6 gls with 74,000 miles ;)
Logged

Omega_Dan

  • Guest
Re: 04 Omega Bargain? certainly of interest...
« Reply #12 on: 10 February 2011, 12:56:04 »
Probably going to be sat there for a while ;D
Logged

Del Boy

  • Omega Queen
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Kent, UK.
  • Posts: 10804
    • 2012 '62' BMW 730d MSport
    • View Profile
Re: 04 Omega Bargain? certainly of interest...
« Reply #13 on: 10 February 2011, 12:57:24 »
Quote
Quote
Even simpler for me, I won't buy a 4 pot Mig...  IMO they need the bigger more powerful engines to cope with the weight of the car...  The fuel economy is only marginally better than the V6's anyway...

From a diesel driver?  ::)

He has 6 cylinders though, and bags of torque and power because his is chipped :)
Logged
Drives: 2013 (13) BMW 530d M Sport Touring, 2011 '61' BMW 520d SE.

omegabsw

  • Intermediate Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Essex
  • Posts: 312
    • View Profile
Re: 04 Omega Bargain? certainly of interest...
« Reply #14 on: 10 February 2011, 13:01:20 »
Quote
Quote
Quote
Even simpler for me, I won't buy a 4 pot Mig...  IMO they need the bigger more powerful engines to cope with the weight of the car...  The fuel economy is only marginally better than the V6's anyway...

From a diesel driver?  ::)

He has 6 cylinders though, and bags of torque and power because his is chipped :)

Its not a V6 tho

And I would say that the MPG between my 2.2 manual and my 2.5 auto is a lot more then marginal, I would go as far as saying its a lot bloody better
« Last Edit: 10 February 2011, 13:02:47 by omegabsw »
Logged
Pages: [1] 2  All   Go Up
« previous next »
 

Page created in 0.027 seconds with 21 queries.