As things stand, either Parliament is going to decide on Hard Brexit, some form of Soft Brexit, or No Brexit. How is it undemocratic to allow the people to make that decision if Parliament cannot?
Hard or soft then , as it's always been but absolutely NO remain .
You cannot capitulate to those malevolent thugs and have any degree of self respect .
The UK wants only to stand alone, mind it's own business and trade freely with the world as a whole but the eu, and I speak of the individuals who believe they own it , want to manipulate , interfere and exert control over the UK and whole of Western Europe . That's oppressio
And if you think that's hyberbole try living in one of the PIGS countries that suffered post crash of 2008 .
I said it before that it's like the Mafia , if you're in then you'll do as your told , if you want out we'll kill you .
If a soft or sloppy Brexit cannot be acheived by dignified negotiation with the eu and other parliamentery parties then let's get on with it because the world will still turn on the Saturday morning and it wont be Armageddon.
[/quote]
What would the question or question(s) be for a second vote and who would decide?.......parliament probably won't be able to reach a consensus.
.....and what if we end up with another 48/52 vote or similar?
A second vote is too simplistic.......and it may even start a civil war.
The whole episode is a complete clusterf*uck.