Omega Owners Forum

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  

News:

Please check the Forum Guidelines at the top of the Newbie section

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.

Messages - TheBoy

95371
General Discussion Area / Re: Vista or XP???
« on: 14 July 2007, 18:09:09 »
Oh, other thing with google maps, is that it automatically downloads what you are asking for, fairly quickly as well.  Probably hits the gprs a bit though....

95372
General Discussion Area / Re: Vista or XP???
« on: 14 July 2007, 18:07:59 »
Having both TomTom and Memory Map on the phone, I didn't think I would need Google Maps, but it makes a useful addition. Even if I was far to drunk to read any maps ::)

95373
General Discussion Area / Re: Vista or XP???
« on: 14 July 2007, 15:27:49 »
Quote
I was going to get ISDN, then BT got the hump and told me I'd have to relinquish my 5 digit phone number - just after I'd moved in and told everyone my number - so I waited for broadband.  >:(

The mobile phone test gear I work with supports HSDPA. Seeing megabits go through a mobile phone is a wake up call. However, that's effectively with a bit of coax between phone and base station. I wonder what throughput'll be like in the real world. Plenty of quicker stuff in the pipeline too. Just need the Tunnies of the world to dream up some applications before the service providers get cold feet.

Not that Tunnie gets as much time to dream now ;D

Kevin

Went on a 'lads day out' yesterday (still sufferring badly today), and was bored on train.  So downloaded the mobile version of Google maps to my phone.  What an excellent bit of kit - that could use up some of the bandwidth ;)

(OK, so I have Tomtom and Memory Map (Ordinance Survey maps) on the phone, but the google maps was brilliant - I'm here in a strange town, show me all the pizza places near me)

95374
General Discussion Area / Re: Vista or XP???
« on: 12 July 2007, 21:20:12 »
Quote
I agree. None of this is really an option yet, but it is interesting to think outside the box every now and then.

After all, 5 years ago my only internet access was using a 56k dialup modem. Now I've got a mobile phone that's way smaller than the one I had then with a better internet connection than I had at home.

It does make me wonder what the future has in store. Will we keep just scaling up the things we have today or will something radical happen?  8-)

Kevin
5 years ago, I had a broadband connection, then for several years before, ISDN.  Trying to think if I ever had 56k dialup at home, think I went from 28800 to ISDN, it was that long ago.  How anyone could use analogue modems for internet access is beyond me.....

I agree with what you say - my first modem was 2400, even GSM is 9600 (and was 10 years ago).  My Windows phone is probably more powerful than my first Win95 PC.....

95375
General Discussion Area / Re: Vista or XP???
« on: 12 July 2007, 21:00:58 »
Quote
If you have to reboot ASAP, then why does it say that you can continue your work if you install the updates?  :-? >:(
Precisely that - carry on working whilst the updates are being deployed. Just reboot as soon as they are finished.

95376
General Discussion Area / Re: Vista or XP???
« on: 12 July 2007, 20:59:32 »
Quote
Quote
I don't need pop-ups every five minutes interrupting what I'm doing

Don't get me started on popups! Oh, for the days when a computer did what the user said and sat idle otherwise  :D

Quote
The poor driver cannot be blamed on the OS.

No, but when the whole process of installing, de-installing, etc. is hidden from me, it has to work faultlessly. Otherwise, I'd rather do the job manually and know what's been messed about with so I can get in and put it right. Whilst I've got the option to do that under Linux, with Windows it's not as simple.

Quote
even the most fanatical Linux user wouldn't recommend it to my 70yr old mum, who gets along with Windows nicely.

I appologise if I'm doing your mum a grave injustice here ;) but I'd wager that both systems are probably overkill, and I was talking about this with a colleague at lunch time today, as a matter of fact.

Why does an average home user need a system that's effectively identical to a developer's desktop? The things they do are pretty mundane. Web browsing, email, word processing and other office apps, downloading from their digital camera, etc. All that and more could be achieved with a small internet connected "thin client" that boots instantly, won't run malicious code and takes up much less space in the house.

Connect it to a service like Google Docs & Spreadsheet (just an example!) and the headache of storing, backing up files, installing applications, etc. is gone. The unit doesn't even need any storage itself so malicious code has nowhere to hide. No more firewalls, anti-virus software, etc. or viruses if they fail or aren't updated. The user can access their desktop from anywhere on the web too.

People use computers for other things without even realising it on a day to day basis, and because they're leaned down to the task in hand there's no hassle involved. When's the last time you had to wait for your Motronic to boot, or had to remove a virus from your set top box?  :D

Kevin
Some software and drivers under Linux scatter files all over the shop, with no uninstaller, so searching through /usr/bin /usr/sbin /usr/local/bin /etc and so on.  Again, those Win apps that obey the rules tend to come on and off OK. MSI is a good technology, but you always get people who want to push it beyond its design...

I agree, for my Mum's use - web, email, word processing, dtp for a column she does for local rag, digi pics, mp3s etc are her main requirements - it is overkill.  But its easy to use (for her) overkill. And its reliable, and secure.

The TC won't work until broadband speeds and reliability, not to mention caps etc, are hugely improved.  Local storage will always beat high latency storage, and with drive prices so cheap, it will be hard to convince consumers otherwise. Look at Citrix Winframe/Metaframe/Presentation Server or whatever its called this version - probably the best thin client system currently available.  Is it widely used? Not really, though does well in its niche...

Not that convinced that the rented webapps will be that big tbh.  I was installing 'rented apps over Internet' platforms a few years ago.  Never really took off, as the sales people couldn't sell it.  At a consumer level, persuading people to rent software will be difficult. In large business, may be easier, but server performance may well become a huge issue. And with heavily locked down workstations, breaking the OS shouldn't be an issue.

95377
General Discussion Area / Re: Vista or XP???
« on: 12 July 2007, 20:19:14 »
Quote
The driver issue may not be Vista's 'fault', but it is a major problem and good reason to not use Vista for at least 6 more months.  Vista may prove to to be good, but it is to be avoided for now.  

Windows is not the only good OS, Mac's are quite good.  Safari can be a bit unstable, but OSX is great.  One thing typifies my thoughts on the hubris of MS, Windows Update.  I don't mind downloading and installing updates but the world isn't going to end if I don't reboot right away.  I don't need pop-ups every five minutes interrupting what I'm doing, or the computer destroying an hour's work by rebooting if I leave for 10 minutes because I wasn't enough of a supplicant to the altar of Bill.  SWMBO says that Windows Update is a synonym for Virus and refuses to do them.  She does have fewer problems with her laptop . . .  :-?
Vista was launched on 1st November - that makes it 8 months old by my reckoning ;).  Even the consumer launch was nearly 6 months ago.

OSX isn't too bad, though, again, using my Mum as a benchmark, I think she would be more productive with Windows. OSX seems, for me, to have lost some of the Mac 'magic' if that makes sense...

Safari. Bit of a standing joke at the moment. Not a week goes by without another CERT warning ;D

As to the reboot warnings, thats what the registry is for if its automated.  If not automated, you should only be doing updates when you are in a position to reboot.  Same applies to any system - after a system update, a reload/reboot should happen asap afterwards.

95378
General Discussion Area / Re: Vista or XP???
« on: 12 July 2007, 16:43:21 »
The poor driver cannot be blamed on the OS.

When it comes to built in scripting, the Microsoft scripting is miles ahead of shell scripts (I'm talking WSH here).  The documentation available for the language and the objects you wish to manipulate is free and thorough - see msdn site.

As you hint at, Windows biggest problem is that people who really have no idea can set up a working (but frequently flawed) system.  The same is beginning to work with Linux as well now :(

I'm pleased Linux works for you, but even the most fanatical Linux user wouldn't recommend it to my 70yr old mum, who gets along with Windows nicely.  Windows is, and for the foreseeable future will remain, the best desktop.  MS Works (with Word) is a fantastic suite for most home users.  Very few home users need Office.  As Windows and Works will likely come with your £250 Dell desktop, the MS costs for most buyers is non existent - the OEM licence for Vista Basic and Works is probably around $15 to the manufacturer.  So, the cost argument doesn't work for most users.

Underlying problems which have existed for a long time? Can't think of any, except the ones tied to IA32?

95379
General Discussion Area / Re: Vista or XP???
« on: 12 July 2007, 14:53:36 »
Quote
Quote
No usb to serial adpter works with vista, as neither driver maker has released an update.

.. and very few machines have real serial ports now ::). Worth bearing in mind.

The thing that gets me about new windows versions is that there's clearly a lot of effort put into making it look flash and changing around the GUI and other trivia whereas the code underneath it still suffers from a lot of the same problems. M$ work on the basis that customers are stuck with them so have to figure out where they've hidden all the stuff they used to know about or lump it.

.. but then maybe that's just me. I'd rather go back to a command prompt anyway!

Kevin

Now, as many of you may know, my job is Unix. Therefore, I like command line (obviously we never install the crap X Windows system on any of our servers).

However, I do know an awful lot about Windows, including Vista.

I accept many people won't like Microsoft for a variety of reasons, though when pushed can never give a good one.  Microsoft make huge amounts of money, and fair play to them for it.

Vista, despite what the Linux followers may bleat, is different underneath to previous versions. Yes its based on XP codebase, but many key parts of the kernel mode dlls rewritten.  Many will look, and think its just a flash new frontend to the same old rubbish.  That is so far from the reality.  And, with all the 'NT based' versions of Windows, Microsoft have always provided more in command line than they have in GUI - they understand that sysadmins need to script lots.


What does make me giggle is its often the Linux enthusiasts that slate Microsoft.  Linux is the OS going nowhere - fundamentally it hasn't changed since its inception.  And security - how many of the Windows servers compared to Linux servers that I look after have been exploited with Day 0 attacks - another win for Windows.

Performance, hmm, tough one, as almost impossible to get a true like for like.  But Linux doesn't seem fast - certainly some of our old Solaris services which were running on really old and knackered hardware have been migrated to Linux on brand spanking Xeon based servers, and it seems those services now run slower.

Cost. Enterprise versions of Linux, needed for proper business use, are bloody expensive, so over the 3yr life of a system, Windows will probably work out cheaper.

95380
General Discussion Area / Re: Vista or XP???
« on: 12 July 2007, 12:46:04 »
Quote
Quote
Quote
vista has a few problems with some programmes, ive got a number of them that conflict and have to try and get a solution from the microsoft website. stick to xp
Actually, according to the developers site, any program that obeyed the recent (last 5yrs) recommended rules for Windows development will run fine under Windows Vista.

There are a few older ones that are a bit naughty with registry, or use kernel mode, that may not work too well. Ones that directly manipulate hardware, inc COM ports, may struggle (cheapo tech2 lead may not work).

But virtually all of fairly recent apps should be no problem.
Yeah, that's what I was referring to.  Good luck getting anything installed that uses the USB port and isn't mainstream.  I'd be surprised if your real Tech2 works, it's not just the cheapo stuff that is a problem.

Tech2 works fine if proper com port. No usb to serial adpter works with vista, as neither driver maker has released an update.

95381
General Discussion Area / Re: Vista or XP???
« on: 12 July 2007, 09:12:42 »
Quote
vista has a few problems with some programmes, ive got a number of them that conflict and have to try and get a solution from the microsoft website. stick to xp
Actually, according to the developers site, any program that obeyed the recent (last 5yrs) recommended rules for Windows development will run fine under Windows Vista.

There are a few older ones that are a bit naughty with registry, or use kernel mode, that may not work too well. Ones that directly manipulate hardware, inc COM ports, may struggle (cheapo tech2 lead may not work).

But virtually all of fairly recent apps should be no problem.

95382
General Discussion Area / Re: Vista or XP???
« on: 11 July 2007, 21:30:14 »
Quote
God I can't stand Vista!  >:(

It came on the very nice, and very powerful "laptop" that PC world gave me to apologise....

Now this is a seriosu piece of kit with 2gig of ram for starters!
Vista is horribly bloated, takes an eternity to bl**dy load and shut down, has a convoluted way of doing things, has IE7  >:( >:( and is really not happy with Videostudio software!

I will probably set up a dual boot system with XP to save my sanity!

As far as I am aware, the only laptops you can still buy new with XP are Dell ones.
Sorry, but Vista is a long way from being a decent replacemnt to XP right now....
I am surprised its slow.  Maybe the specs of the laptop are not what we expect off a modern machine.  Any Core2 Duo, 2Gb RAM fast 5400 spin HDD and discrete VGA should run Vista very well.

Granted, Vista will likely be slower than XP on same hardware, in same way XP slower than W2K, itself slower than NT4 etc...

95383
General Discussion Area / Re: Vista or XP???
« on: 11 July 2007, 20:21:32 »
Quote
Quote
Nought wrong with Vista if the hardware is powerful enough to run it.  Takes a bit of getting used to, but then you actually find XP hard work when you go back to it.
Nothing works on Vista.  Can't get drivers.  Can't set security so that programs will run.  Can't run anything pre-.NET.  If you want to do anything other than Office and IE you're hosed.  Even stuff like the scroll wheel on a mouse doesn't work with Outlook.

Many people I know are switching to MacBooks with OSX and XP on bootcamp.  As stable and robust as IBM but a lot cheaper.
I've found very little software that doesn't run, and for a new OS, current driver support is excellent (though still behind XP), and improving all the time.

95384
General Discussion Area / Re: Vista or XP???
« on: 11 July 2007, 19:53:39 »
Nought wrong with Vista if the hardware is powerful enough to run it.  Takes a bit of getting used to, but then you actually find XP hard work when you go back to it.

95385
General Discussion Area / Re: Anti VIrus
« on: 14 July 2007, 21:24:45 »
Quote
Quote
Quote
For ages I used Antivir as it was free and I just scanned weekly. my new ISP provides a free Norton, anyway after a month of poor performance and constantly trying to disable it - there was no uninstall either!! I removed it following some guides - what a relief!

Going to try AVG now

You didnt install the software they would have sent you on a cd did you?

Totally uneccesary.....much better to setup manually  :y

I downloaded via link from ISP :(
Silly boy ;)

Page created in 0.064 seconds with 16 queries.