I know on my BMW V8 the chain driven from the crank only drives one camshaft per bank, and the other camshaft is driven by a secondary chain from the first. Makes sense because chains aren't as easily routed as belts, and when you use duplex chains that generally outlast the engine it's not an issue! But if they've done something similar with belts, that's just insanity
Personally I think the Omega requirement of belt + tensioner change every 40k is a bit of a joke (and even at that it seems some of them don't last that long
). Every other belt-driven car I've had was at least 80k intervals and there were seldom reports of them breaking even when neglected. Off-topic but why are the GM belts (or tensioners) so comparatively crap? Couldn't they have improved the design when they realised the parts were utter crap and had no chance of lasting the original 80k interval?