Omega Owners Forum
Chat Area => General Discussion Area => Topic started by: Andy B on 11 January 2018, 23:43:32
-
Anyone care to translate? Way over my head. ::)
(https://www.caravanclub.co.uk/globalassets/discussions/ff5db7df-553c-4d45-b20b-47902664e151/)
(https://www.caravanclub.co.uk/globalassets/discussions/aafa692e-6989-460f-b1a9-c842fbfbeeaf)
-
Black one resolves to “I’m sec(C) and I know it” I think. Top one, no idea. :-\
-
first one is worked out as
x2 evaluated between 13 and 10. In other words 132 less 102 = 69
.... dull.....
-
They actually are quite upmarket.
I see cheap Chinese t shirts on people and they contain spelling mistakes. I often wonder if they are sold as seconds because they have rhe mistakes or firsts and the boss of the company is blissfully unaware.
-
x2 evaluated between 13 and 10. In other words 132 less 102 = 69
Ahh! I had (mis) remembered that you evaluate f(x) for all integers between the upper and lower bounds. Hence why I couldn’t make sense of it.
-
Thanks ..... i knew someone would know :y
-
first one is worked out as
x2 evaluated between 13 and 10. In other words 132 less 102 = 69
.... dull.....
.
I bet if you, offerd to do it she would be offended, also would the wearer understand the equation, and know the answer ?
-
first one is worked out as
x2 evaluated between 13 and 10. In other words 132 less 102 = 69
.... dull.....
.
I bet if you, offerd to do it she would be offended, also would the wearer understand the equation, and know the answer ?
let's see the full face in the picture before I answer that...
-
first one is worked out as
x2 evaluated between 13 and 10. In other words 132 less 102 = 69
.... dull.....
.
I bet if you, offerd to do it she would be offended, also would the wearer understand the equation, and know the answer ?
let's see the full face in the picture before I answer that...
You wouldn't be looking at her face?
-
first one is worked out as
x2 evaluated between 13 and 10. In other words 132 less 102 = 69
.... dull.....
.
I bet if you, offerd to do it she would be offended, also would the wearer understand the equation, and know the answer ?
let's see the full face in the picture before I answer that...
You wouldn't be looking at her face?
;D ;D ;D ;D
-
first one is worked out as
x2 evaluated between 13 and 10. In other words 132 less 102 = 69
.... dull.....
.
I bet if you, offerd to do it she would be offended, also would the wearer understand the equation, and know the answer ?
let's see the full face in the picture before I answer that...
You wouldn't be looking at her face?
My thoughts exactly :D
-
I never once thought that I would be re-introduced to the "joys" of integral calculus on here.
My nightmares has started again: I must go and lie down in a darkened room for a few weeks.....
Ron.
-
The solution gave me flashbacks of thirty years ago when I could just about solve it myself. Which makes me feel really old.
-
But we are only 29, aren't we Nick? :-X
Ron.
-
But we are only 29, aren't we Nick? :-X
Ron.
Oh yeah, I'd forgotten.
Or my maths has got really bad ;D
-
The solution gave me flashbacks of thirty years ago when I could just about solve it myself. Which makes me feel really old.
It was probably nearer 40 years ago for me ..... hence now having no idea where to even start.
-
first one is worked out as
x2 evaluated between 13 and 10. In other words 132 less 102 = 69
.... dull.....
.
I bet if you, offerd to do it she would be offended, also would the wearer understand the equation, and know the answer ?
let's see the full face in the picture before I answer that...
You wouldn't be looking at her face?
My thoughts exactly :D
Don't look at the mantle piece,while poking the fire. ;D
-
The solution gave me flashbacks of thirty years ago when I could just about solve it myself. Which makes me feel really old.
It was probably nearer 40 years ago for me ..... hence now having no idea where to even start.
Nearly 50 for me so not a bl**dy clue. :-[
-
I never once thought that I would be re-introduced to the "joys" of integral calculus on here.
My nightmares has started again: I must go and lie down in a darkened room for a few weeks.....
Ron.
Where you taught electronics for a Nightmare on Elm Street evening recall some of the maths when designing complex control systems. ;D ;D ;D
-
I never once thought that I would be re-introduced to the "joys" of integral calculus on here.
My nightmares has started again: I must go and lie down in a darkened room for a few weeks.....
Ron.
Where you taught electronics for a Nightmare on Elm Street evening recall some of the maths when designing complex control systems. ;D ;D ;D
I'd a bloody good job I barely ever dropped a mark on the computing and general electronics papers at university because they compensated for the fact that I just CBA to wade through all the maths. ::)