Omega Owners Forum

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  

News:

Welcome to OOF

Pages: [1]   Go Down

Author Topic: 2.6 and 3.2 performence  (Read 1895 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

unlucky mark mv6

  • Omega Knight
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • tipton,west mids
  • Posts: 1904
    • View Profile
2.6 and 3.2 performence
« on: 08 July 2009, 12:18:06 »

How much of a difference is it between the two and is it that much noticeable. :y
Logged
Machine polishing in west mids £40 also body repairs.pm me for more info.

bob.dent

  • Omega Lord
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Hertfordshire
  • Posts: 6781
  • Drives better than an Omega
    • Mondeo 2.0TDCI Estate
    • View Profile
Re: 2.6 and 3.2 performence
« Reply #1 on: 08 July 2009, 12:31:48 »

2.6 is around 176bhp and 3.2 around 213bhp.
I used to have a 2.5v6 estate and now have a 3.2v6 estate and the difference is very noticeable, but I'm not sure how much difference with the 2.6.
Logged
I HAVE THE BODY OF AN 18 YEAR OLD.......I KEEP IT IN THE FRIDGE!

joshwyatt

  • Omega Baron
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Oxford
  • Posts: 2049
    • View Profile
Re: 2.6 and 3.2 performence
« Reply #2 on: 08 July 2009, 12:52:52 »

I have a 2003 Omega brochure, and the figures for performance are as follows, I know it's not real world figures but should give you an idea...

2.6 saloon manual (auto figures in brackets):
0-60 in 8.5 secs (9.5)
Top speed 142 mph (139)

2.6 estate manual (auto):
0-60 in 9.0 secs (10.0)
Top speed 137 mph (134)

3.2 saloon auto
149 top speed, 0-60 in 8.0 secs

3.2 estate auto
144 top speed, 0-60 in 8.5 secs

unlucky mark mv6

  • Omega Knight
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • tipton,west mids
  • Posts: 1904
    • View Profile
Re: 2.6 and 3.2 performence
« Reply #3 on: 08 July 2009, 13:02:31 »

Quote
I have a 2003 Omega brochure, and the figures for performance are as follows, I know it's not real world figures but should give you an idea...

2.6 saloon manual (auto figures in brackets):
0-60 in 8.5 secs (9.5)
Top speed 142 mph (139)

2.6 estate manual (auto):
0-60 in 9.0 secs (10.0)
Top speed 137 mph (134)

3.2 saloon auto
149 top speed, 0-60 in 8.0 secs

3.2 estate auto
144 top speed, 0-60 in 8.5 secs
Thanks folks,reason i ask is my brother is on lookout for a mig now and wants to swap his vec 2.2 sri(slightly modded),if anyone is interested.Looking for 2.6 or 3.2 ,mv6 or elite. :y
Logged
Machine polishing in west mids £40 also body repairs.pm me for more info.

webby23

  • Omega Baron
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Nottingham
  • Posts: 2468
  • MV6
    • View Profile
Re: 2.6 and 3.2 performence
« Reply #4 on: 08 July 2009, 16:43:54 »

My 2.6 MV6 auto feels alot faster than those times suggest although I havent timed the sprint up to 60.

Top speed I darent try....on 6 pts already.....but it cruises lovely at 70-90mph on the motorway, with 80 being a real acceleration sweet spot........

 :y
Logged
The only certainty of life is death. Live your life and enjoy it. The clock is ticking

Martin_1962

  • Guest
Re: 2.6 and 3.2 performence
« Reply #5 on: 08 July 2009, 17:49:02 »

My 2.6 auto is as quick on acceleration as a 3.0 auto
Logged

Omega man 2

  • Omega Knight
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • 0
  • Posts: 1392
  • If all else fails, get out the oxy!
    • View Profile
Re: 2.6 and 3.2 performence
« Reply #6 on: 08 July 2009, 18:06:04 »

Is there any official figures for a 3.2 manual, with it not being for sale to the general pubic ::)
Logged

Macduff

  • Intermediate Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Bedfordshire
  • Posts: 318
    • Omege 2.6 CD
    • View Profile
Re: 2.6 and 3.2 performence
« Reply #7 on: 08 July 2009, 21:05:13 »

My 2.6 seems fast enough to me, my only complaint is it didn't come with a twin exhaust which looks so much better

I am currently looking for a 3.2 back box but not having any luck (but I don't want to pay full price as I'm as tight as a ducks bum) thought I'd take a chance and put that last bit in just in case somebody on OOF has one going spare sorry havn't got enough posts yet
Logged
Born free taxed to death

Martin_1962

  • Guest
Re: 2.6 and 3.2 performence
« Reply #8 on: 08 July 2009, 21:11:56 »

Quote
My 2.6 auto is as quick on acceleration as a 3.0 auto


When the MAF worked properly ::)
Logged

amigov6

  • Guest
Re: 2.6 and 3.2 performence
« Reply #9 on: 08 July 2009, 21:19:23 »

Quote
My 2.6 auto is as quick on acceleration as a 3.0 auto
We tested this at York in real terms. I was driving Richard Irv's lovely 2.6 auto MV6 using the gears manually so quicker than sport button. Surprised at how well it pulled but twice Ian_D passed me in his 3.0 auto Elite despite me getting away first. ::)
Logged

Martin_1962

  • Guest
Re: 2.6 and 3.2 performence
« Reply #10 on: 08 July 2009, 21:31:10 »

Quote
Quote
My 2.6 auto is as quick on acceleration as a 3.0 auto
We tested this at York in real terms. I was driving Richard Irv's lovely 2.6 auto MV6 using the gears manually so quicker than sport button. Surprised at how well it pulled but twice Ian_D passed me in his 3.0 auto Elite despite me getting away first. ::)

What cams does Richard have?
Logged

feeutfo

  • Guest
Re: 2.6 and 3.2 performence
« Reply #11 on: 09 July 2009, 05:00:58 »

get a 3.2 in a round aboutish size corner and jab the throttle, the back will respond accordingly.
Do the same in a 2.5, and from what i gather 2.6 is not dissimilar, very little happens by comparison.
Logged

Dazzler

  • Omega Baron
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Haverhill, Suffolk
  • Posts: 4198
  • Drive it like you stole it......
    • View Profile
Re: 2.6 and 3.2 performence
« Reply #12 on: 09 July 2009, 23:24:15 »

Quote
get a 3.2 in a round aboutish size corner and jab the throttle, the back will respond accordingly.
Do the same in a 2.5, and from what i gather 2.6 is not dissimilar, very little happens by comparison.

I agree :y

Bring on the 3.2 ;D
Logged
Big jobbies now finished.....Now running on LPG

i260

  • Senior Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Newport, South Wales
  • Posts: 515
    • View Profile
Re: 2.6 and 3.2 performence
« Reply #13 on: 10 July 2009, 00:51:56 »

Quote
2.6 is around 176bhp and 3.2 around 213bhp.
I used to have a 2.5v6 estate and now have a 3.2v6 estate and the difference is very noticeable, but I'm not sure how much difference with the 2.6.

2.5  to 2.6 is noticable in a 10bhp sort of way. My dad had both and instantly noticed the difference when getting into the 2.6.

If the right 2.6 came along don't ignore it, just get some 3.2 cams (or lob a 3.2 into it!).

Quote
My 2.6 seems fast enough to me, my only complaint is it didn't come with a twin exhaust which looks so much better

I am currently looking for a 3.2 back box but not having any luck (but I don't want to pay full price as I'm as tight as a ducks bum) thought I'd take a chance and put that last bit in just in case somebody on OOF has one going spare sorry havn't got enough posts yet

Get the Eternal item - £40 delivered.

Quote
get a 3.2 in a round aboutish size corner and jab the throttle, the back will respond accordingly.
Do the same in a 2.5, and from what i gather 2.6 is not dissimilar, very little happens by comparison.

Only if you have decent tread on your  tyres on the back of the 2.6! My tail slides nicely thank you very much - part worn Dunlops or Pirellis or something as fitted as std from factory.
« Last Edit: 10 July 2009, 00:55:09 by i260 »
Logged
Saab 9-5 Aero 260ps

feeutfo

  • Guest
Re: 2.6 and 3.2 performence
« Reply #14 on: 10 July 2009, 01:04:54 »

Quote
get a 3.2 in a round aboutish size corner and jab the throttle, the back will respond accordingly.
Do the same in a 2.5, and from what i gather 2.6 is not dissimilar, very little happens by comparison.
Quote
Only if you have decent tread on your  tyres on the back of the 2.6! My tail slides nicely thank you very much - part worn Dunlops or Pirellis or something as fitted as std from factory.
:-)
« Last Edit: 10 July 2009, 01:06:54 by chrisgixer »
Logged
Pages: [1]   Go Up
 

Page created in 0.078 seconds with 23 queries.