Omega Owners Forum

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  

News:

Welcome to OOF

Pages: [1] 2 3 4  All   Go Down

Author Topic: Fuel Consumption  (Read 4061 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

damon80

  • Senior Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Wigan
  • Posts: 698
    • View Profile
Fuel Consumption
« on: 10 November 2007, 00:34:52 »

I know this topic has prob been done to death, but...

Fuel consumption.

Now, as you can see from my profile, we've got a 52-plate 3.2 MV6 (ex plod - hence manual).  It's got 125k under it's belt.

Before we got it, looking at Parkers on t'internet, it said that avg mpg is 24mpg for an auto (no manual listed).  So, I thought at best I'd expect 26 - 27mpg out of it, on account of it being a manual.

But, when I've checked it's consumption since we've had it, its averaged 32mpg - and thats doing a mix of motorway driving, and being stuck in city-centre traffic (and I'm not that light with my right foot either).

My missus has got a P-plate 1.3 Fiesta with 90k on it, and doing similar journeys gets 35mpg.

I know it's not a like-for-like comparison - the Omega is obviously much higher-geared than the Fiesta which makes for more economical cruising on the motorway, but it's also got plenty of grunt at lower-speeds - I can sink the Omega into 5th at 25mph.

For the sake on 3mpg difference, I know what I'd sooner be driving - and it don't have a blue oval and a rattley camshaft on it!  ;)  And I think I could get better mpg out of the Omega if I was a bit more careful with the right pedal (like showing beemer drivers who's boss at the lights from time to time  ::) )

So, after this long ramble - what kind of mpg are you guys getting?
Logged

IrmscherKris

  • Intermediate Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Manchester
  • Posts: 433
  • banned due to bad trader references
    • View Profile
Re: Fuel Consumption
« Reply #1 on: 10 November 2007, 00:39:20 »

Out of my 3ltr MV6 I got 22 right up to 32 (mway @ 56mph)

It was chipped and decatted though mind...
Logged

Danny

  • Omega Lord
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Wigan, Greater Manchester
  • Posts: 6483
  • BLACK 1.6 BORA SHAPED JETTA!!
    • View Profile
Re: Fuel Consumption
« Reply #2 on: 10 November 2007, 00:42:19 »

Quote
Now, as you can see from my profile, we've got a 52-plate 3.2 MV6 (ex plod - hence manual).  It's got 125k under it's belt

oooooooh careful, belt should have been changed at 40k :y

 ;D ;D ;D
Logged

damon80

  • Senior Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Wigan
  • Posts: 698
    • View Profile
Re: Fuel Consumption
« Reply #3 on: 10 November 2007, 00:50:05 »

Quote
Quote
Now, as you can see from my profile, we've got a 52-plate 3.2 MV6 (ex plod - hence manual).  It's got 125k under it's belt

oooooooh careful, belt should have been changed at 40k :y

 ;D ;D ;D

Aye, it has - at 40k, then 80k, then 120k - I got me GCSE in Maths (against all odds) I'll have ye know!  :P
Logged

Kevin Wood

  • Global Moderator
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Alton, Hampshire
  • Posts: 36281
    • Jaguar XE 25t, Westfield
    • View Profile
Re: Fuel Consumption
« Reply #4 on: 10 November 2007, 00:51:15 »

My 3.2 auto MV6 averages about 27 or 28 on my normal commute. That's a mix of urban driving and "A"roads, and fairly gentle with the occasional hoon to the red line :y.

Motorway cruising at 65/70 it has averaged 36 over 100 miles. Up the cruising speed to 80 and it's probably down to 30, perhaps 32.

It is thirsty in very dense urban traffic, as a heavy car with an auto box will be.  Those are the journeys when you want a Ford Fester :y

So, add a couple of MPG for the manual box (especially in urban driving. once the torque converter is locked up the auto probably doesn't make much odds) and it's looking comparable.

Kevin
Logged
Tech2 services currently available. See TheBoy's price list: http://theboy.omegaowners.com/

damon80

  • Senior Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Wigan
  • Posts: 698
    • View Profile
Re: Fuel Consumption
« Reply #5 on: 10 November 2007, 00:51:44 »

Quote
Out of my 3ltr MV6 I got 22 right up to 32 (mway @ 56mph)

It was chipped and decatted though mind...

On the motorway I cruise at - ahem, 70mph - I never go over that, not even up to - ahem, 85 to 90mph...  ;)
Logged

Kevin Wood

  • Global Moderator
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Alton, Hampshire
  • Posts: 36281
    • Jaguar XE 25t, Westfield
    • View Profile
Re: Fuel Consumption
« Reply #6 on: 10 November 2007, 00:56:08 »

Well, I only do on my holidays abroad, of course!

As I found out this summer, the really telling thing about these cars is how nicely they cruise at 120 on the autobahn with the cruise control on. Fuel consumption aint that spectacular then, though :o

Kevin
Logged
Tech2 services currently available. See TheBoy's price list: http://theboy.omegaowners.com/

damon80

  • Senior Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Wigan
  • Posts: 698
    • View Profile
Re: Fuel Consumption
« Reply #7 on: 10 November 2007, 01:04:27 »

Well, on the autobahn was where we were this summer, but that was in the old Jeep, powered by Dr Diesel's invention, with shed in tow...

We're planning on doing the same next summer, but tenting and hotelling (if that's a word...) it - over there.

I'm just now, as I type, digging out the receipt from my last fill-up (I keep em all, writing the miles what I've done on the back of em - I'm sad like that!  :-[  ;D )
Logged

Kevin Wood

  • Global Moderator
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Alton, Hampshire
  • Posts: 36281
    • Jaguar XE 25t, Westfield
    • View Profile
Re: Fuel Consumption
« Reply #8 on: 10 November 2007, 01:10:17 »

Quote
We're planning on doing the same next summer, but tenting and hotelling (if that's a word...) it - over there.

That's the way to do it.  ;) Went down to Italy and back this summer.

Kevin
  
Logged
Tech2 services currently available. See TheBoy's price list: http://theboy.omegaowners.com/

damon80

  • Senior Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Wigan
  • Posts: 698
    • View Profile
Re: Fuel Consumption
« Reply #9 on: 10 November 2007, 01:14:31 »

We're planning on going to eye-tie land next year too - to venice.
Where did you go in Italy?
Logged

damon80

  • Senior Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Wigan
  • Posts: 698
    • View Profile
Re: Fuel Consumption
« Reply #10 on: 10 November 2007, 01:17:14 »

Right, got my last receipt.  Here goes...

I got 42.06 Litres, at 98.9p a Litre (why's it alway .9 at the end??  ::) )

Which, dividing by 4.54, is 9.45 gallons.

I did 307 miles to that, which works out as:

32.48mpg
Logged

JamesV6CDX

  • Omega Queen
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gloucestershire/Buckinghamshire
  • Posts: 16549
    • Omega 3.2 Retail MV6 LPG
    • View Profile
Re: Fuel Consumption
« Reply #11 on: 10 November 2007, 01:21:08 »

That's bloody good...

I get 18mpg on my commute, all A roads and dual carraige way!
Logged

damon80

  • Senior Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Wigan
  • Posts: 698
    • View Profile
Re: Fuel Consumption
« Reply #12 on: 10 November 2007, 01:29:10 »

What's in yours James - an auto box?

How did the interview for the new job go btw?
Logged

JamesV6CDX

  • Omega Queen
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gloucestershire/Buckinghamshire
  • Posts: 16549
    • Omega 3.2 Retail MV6 LPG
    • View Profile
Re: Fuel Consumption
« Reply #13 on: 10 November 2007, 01:30:34 »

Quote
What's in yours James - an auto box?

How did the interview for the new job go btw?

Mine is a 2.5 manual. 18mpg is hammering it, which I regularly do on the way to work! It will see 30+ mpg on a run. although, my 3.0 manual was better on fuel.

The interviews went well, and I passed the exams. I just need to wait now!
Logged

damon80

  • Senior Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Wigan
  • Posts: 698
    • View Profile
Re: Fuel Consumption
« Reply #14 on: 10 November 2007, 01:34:12 »

Good man on the job front - I'm chuffed for you!  :y

But what you say about your 3.0 being better on the ol' motion lotion - thats what I meant when I started this thread.  My theory is you can have a smaller lump that doesn't neccessarily do more mpg than a bigger one (oooo err missus  ;) )
Logged
Pages: [1] 2 3 4  All   Go Up
 

Page created in 0.026 seconds with 21 queries.