Omega Owners Forum

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  

News:

Please play nicely.  No one wants to listen/read a keyboard warriors rants....

Pages: 1 2 [3]  All   Go Down

Author Topic: 2.6 , which cams are better for low end?  (Read 875 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

tunnie

  • Get A Life!!
  • **********
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Surrey
  • Posts: 37124
    • 3.2 Elite & Zafira Tourer
    • View Profile
Re: 2.6 , which cams are better for low end?
« Reply #30 on: 07 January 2019, 23:21:48 »

Sounds like a lot of work, I personally prefer bog standard 3.2 with auto box.

Effortless power and an effortless drive.
Logged
Got a VW, Audi, Skoda or Seat? I have full Diagnostic software VCDS to read and program your car. Need something enabling? Perhaps full diagnostic? Drop me a PM. Can diagnose in Camberley or Osterley Area.

zirk

  • Omega Queen
  • ********
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Epping Forest
  • Posts: 11103
  • 3.2 Manual Special Saloon ReMapped and LPG'd and
    • 3.2 Manual Special Estate
    • View Profile
Re: 2.6 , which cams are better for low end?
« Reply #31 on: 07 January 2019, 23:40:29 »

Sounds like a lot of work, I personally prefer bog standard 3.2 with auto box.

Effortless power and an effortless drive.
3.2 Manual with short shift fitted, Remaped, LSD, Police spec Suspension,  and a good blast tbrough Epping Forest will soon cure those thoughts Mark.  ;)

And bring a Crash Helmet.  ;D
Logged
Pages: 1 2 [3]  All   Go Up
 

Page created in 0.1 seconds with 22 queries.