In fairness, in reply 17, you did actually accept that you may be mistaken, which is actually a rarity in itself by the way, but my response was not for any form of gratification, but in response to your continual condescending attitude and regular blunt and abrupt replies to many members queries, not only in this topic, but to a vast number of previous topics over the years, which give the impression that you are criticising their lack of knowledge. I'm not the only member to have commented about your approach to subjects - I'm not saying you haven't got experience of these cars, but unless you are 100% certain about the accuracy of your responses, then you shouldn't be so adamant and in many cases belittling with your replies.
Oh, and it doesn't go amiss to accept you're mistaken (as above), rather than in past instances, just going silent and not responding when you've clearly given duff gen and it has been pointed out and confirmed to be duff info. A 'sorry, I may have got it wrong', or 'I'm not certain, but try this', instead of being so adamant that what you say is correct or the only course of action.
We aren't all perfect and can't know everything, but please give accurate information that you actually know is correct, not what you summise is correct, or be so adamant about a response when it's purely 'from memory'.......