Print

Please login or register.
1 Hour 1 Day 1 Week 1 Month Forever
Login with username, password and session length

[Field Marshal Dr. Opti]

Pennsylvania, November 22

A judge in Pennsylvania has dismissed a lawsuit from the Trump campaign that sought to invalidate millions of mail-in votes in the battleground state.

In the ruling Judge Brann wrote that the Trump campaign had tried to "disenfranchise almost seven million voters".

He said his "court has been presented with strained legal arguments without merit and speculative accusations".

"In the United States of America, this cannot justify the disenfranchisement of a single voter, let alone all the voters of its sixth most populated state," the judge wrote.

What is Trump hoping to achieve?

Why not go to Joe Biden shake his hand and say well done Mr President.

[Sir Tigger KC]

Pennsylvania, November 22

A judge in Pennsylvania has dismissed a lawsuit from the Trump campaign that sought to invalidate millions of mail-in votes in the battleground state.

In the ruling Judge Brann wrote that the Trump campaign had tried to "disenfranchise almost seven million voters".

He said his "court has been presented with strained legal arguments without merit and speculative accusations".

"In the United States of America, this cannot justify the disenfranchisement of a single voter, let alone all the voters of its sixth most populated state," the judge wrote.

What is Trump hoping to achieve?

Why not go to Joe Biden shake his hand and say well done Mr President.

Because he thinks he's been stitched up by the establishment? 

[Field Marshal Dr. Opti]

Pennsylvania, November 22

A judge in Pennsylvania has dismissed a lawsuit from the Trump campaign that sought to invalidate millions of mail-in votes in the battleground state.

In the ruling Judge Brann wrote that the Trump campaign had tried to "disenfranchise almost seven million voters".

He said his "court has been presented with strained legal arguments without merit and speculative accusations".

"In the United States of America, this cannot justify the disenfranchisement of a single voter, let alone all the voters of its sixth most populated state," the judge wrote.

What is Trump hoping to achieve?

Why not go to Joe Biden shake his hand and say well done Mr President.

Because he thinks he's been stitched up by the establishment? 

......and has he been? Or is he delusional?

[Lizzie Zoom]

Pennsylvania, November 22

A judge in Pennsylvania has dismissed a lawsuit from the Trump campaign that sought to invalidate millions of mail-in votes in the battleground state.

In the ruling Judge Brann wrote that the Trump campaign had tried to "disenfranchise almost seven million voters".

He said his "court has been presented with strained legal arguments without merit and speculative accusations".

"In the United States of America, this cannot justify the disenfranchisement of a single voter, let alone all the voters of its sixth most populated state," the judge wrote.

What is Trump hoping to achieve?

Why not go to Joe Biden shake his hand and say well done Mr President.

Because he thinks he's been stitched up by the establishment? 

......and has he been? Or is he delusional?

No he is just a raving mad egotistical bastard!

[Doctor Gollum]

He's been fighting them every step of the way.

Incidentally, it is his constitutional right to defend his presidency within the legal system, even if he loses.

https://www.archives.gov/electoral-college/key-dates

Trump doesn't have to concede. And even if the States all certify their results, the Electors can vote against the majority unless individual State Law requires them to follow the majority. And even then, it only takes one Senator and one Congressman/woman to formally appeal the results in writing to stop the process.

This won't be over until January 6th...

[Lizzie Zoom]

He's been fighting them every step of the way.

Incidentally, it is his constitutional right to defend his presidency within the legal system, even if he loses.

https://www.archives.gov/electoral-college/key-dates

Trump doesn't have to concede. And even if the States all certify their results, the Electors can vote against the majority unless individual State Law requires them to follow the majority. And even then, it only takes one Senator and one Congressman/woman to formally appeal the results in writing to stop the process.

This won't be over until January 6th...

Oh, so that makes it all ok then?!

[Doctor Gollum]

It's a process, enshrined in the constitution. You and the media and Biden can scream and shout all you like, Biden isn't President Elect until January 6th when the House and Senate say so. 

[Lizzie Zoom]

It's a process, enshrined in the constitution. You and the media and Biden can scream and shout all you like, Biden isn't President Elect until January 6th when the House and Senate say so. 

But I'm not, as unlike you apparently I will let the American democratic process do it's stuff for the majority of Americans to get the President they have voted for, without constantly trying to back a loser.  Give it up man.  You are British and you would always come third in Trump's book no matter how "great" you think this egotistical monster is.

[Doctor Gollum]

If Trump loses, so be it, but he's not obliged to concede until January.

Put another way, what would your opinion be if he were to concede only for it to subsequently be proven that Biden was elected fraudulently?

It would be akin to resigning ahead of a disciplinary process knowing that you are morally in the right. Once you quit, you cannot come back.

[Lizzie Zoom]

If Trump loses, so be it, but he's not obliged to concede until January.

Put another way, what would your opinion be if he were to concede only for it to subsequently be proven that Biden was elected fraudulently?

It would be akin to resigning ahead of a disciplinary process knowing that you are morally in the right. Once you quit, you cannot come back.

So you really do think that is possible after NO EVIDENCE WHATSOEVER has been found to support Trump's ludicrous claims?

All he is doing is holding up and hindering the democratic process of his Country and creating dangerous tensions amoungst his supporters.

[STEMO]

He's deranged, Lizzie, most Trump supporters are. I'm not particularly fussed about America, unlike some, so I think it will be quite amusing to watch the whole bunch of mongrel colonists go down the pan 
It can only be a matter of years before China overtakes them both financially and technologically anyway. Of course, if someone like the lunatic Trump is in charge when that happens, then he would probably blow the whole world up before that was allowed to happen.
'Them Chinese stole all out tech and money. It's not fair, boo hoo' 

[Doctor Gollum]

If Trump loses, so be it, but he's not obliged to concede until January.

Put another way, what would your opinion be if he were to concede only for it to subsequently be proven that Biden was elected fraudulently?

It would be akin to resigning ahead of a disciplinary process knowing that you are morally in the right. Once you quit, you cannot come back.

So you really do think that is possible after NO EVIDENCE WHATSOEVER has been found to support Trump's ludicrous claims?

All he is doing is holding up and hindering the democratic process of his Country and creating dangerous tensions amoungst his supporters.

To your last point, it's a process. He IS following the democratic process. The link I posted earlier this afternoon clearly explains the timeline and procedure of the process. It doesn't end until January 6th, regardless the concensus.

To your first point? Who says no evidence has been found? The media?

Starter for ten...

https://www.sos.texas.gov/elections/laws/dominion.shtml

And every court decision can be appealled to a higher court. And each occasion that happens, buys time.

[Lizzie Zoom]

He's deranged, Lizzie, most Trump supporters are. I'm not particularly fussed about America, unlike some, so I think it will be quite amusing to watch the whole bunch of mongrel colonists go down the pan 
It can only be a matter of years before China overtakes them both financially and technologically anyway. Of course, if someone like the lunatic Trump is in charge when that happens, then he would probably blow the whole world up before that was allowed to happen.
'Them Chinese stole all out tech and money. It's not fair, boo hoo' 

Yes Steve, that about sums it for me

It is a good job that the Democratic voting States are mingled with those of the Republicans.  With Trump and many of his heavily armed supporters he could otherwise be tempted to use the ultimate solution on them as he probably thinks any nuclear fall out would not affect him!!

He is that deranged after all!

[Lizzie Zoom]

If Trump loses, so be it, but he's not obliged to concede until January.

Put another way, what would your opinion be if he were to concede only for it to subsequently be proven that Biden was elected fraudulently?

It would be akin to resigning ahead of a disciplinary process knowing that you are morally in the right. Once you quit, you cannot come back.

So you really do think that is possible after NO EVIDENCE WHATSOEVER has been found to support Trump's ludicrous claims?

All he is doing is holding up and hindering the democratic process of his Country and creating dangerous tensions amoungst his supporters.

To your last point, it's a process. He IS following the democratic process. The link I posted earlier this afternoon clearly explains the timeline and procedure of the process. It doesn't end until January 6th, regardless the concensus.

To your first point? Who says no evidence has been found? The media?

Starter for ten...

https://www.sos.texas.gov/elections/laws/dominion.shtml

And every court decision can be appealled to a higher court. And each occasion that happens, buys time.

I am not going to waste my time typing anymore on all this apart from reminding you of King Canute who proved to those around him that even as King he could not turn the tide.  Nor can Trump!

[STEMO]

We'd better hope he doesn't stay in somehow. He sulked on screen at the G20 for five minutes or so then went to play golf. That's because they've mostly congratulated Joe on his win. I believe Donald wet his nappy when Boris spoke to Biden so, if he hung on, there'd be no trade deal for us...or anyone else.....except his good friend and election fixer Vladimir. He hasn't spoken to Joe yet cause him and Donald are trying to work out how the f**k they can make things right.