All valid points, but I'd like to remind everyone of the absolute basic level from which I intended this to start from. Stability. Anything above that level qualifies as being fit for purpose. In that the base level qualification is being met.
Once that is established THEN we can go on to describe a tyre as, for example, shit! Or understeers, or bloody noisy. Up to sticks like super model to a white line.
We can have the subjective discussions later, but I defy anyone to agree that, for example, sc5 are not suitable once they have driven them. These are not to be fitted. And come under horrific.
which is a shame, given previous conti models.
Anyway p6000 are suitable for omega. Weather or not they are the best or worst of the "suitable" category... Well that's a whole differant story altogether.
Is that fair?