Omega Owners Forum

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  

News:

Search the maintenance guides for answers to 99.999% of Omega questions

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 [9] 10 11 12 13   Go Down

Author Topic: The Omega Replacement conundrum, Part 2  (Read 28251 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

TheBoy

  • Administrator
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Brackley, Northants
  • Posts: 105932
  • I Like Lockdown
    • Whatever Starts
    • View Profile
Re: The Omega Replacement conundrum, Part 2
« Reply #120 on: 02 October 2016, 19:03:55 »

C5, certainly the 2 hire ones I've had (a 1.8 I think, and a v6 of some description - both returned similar economy of 20mpg) at just too soft in the corners for me.  And the v6 variant was a bit too lary for the chassis - you can get it well rolled over, then it just understeers like a bastid, finishing off with lift off oversteer.

Logged
Grumpy old man

tunnie

  • Get A Life!!
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Surrey
  • Posts: 37523
    • Zafira Tourer & BMW 435i
    • View Profile
Re: The Omega Replacement conundrum, Part 2
« Reply #121 on: 02 October 2016, 19:05:28 »

Not missed RWD myself, how can you realistically use it in a packed commute? Too much traffic around really, so far i've prefered the CCs handling to the Elite. Far less roll into the corners, when just doing normal speeds around a motorway slip for example.

RWD choice is limited these days, many more options if you accept FWD.
For me, the requirement for RWD is predominantly for comfort. To have any kind of useable power in a FWD car by necessity means removing the suspension.

Unfortunately, due to my over enthusiastic attitude at work in my younger days, and then due to a typical VW driver (in a poxy Passat), I have 2 separate injuries to my back that makes it problematic to drive long distances in overly stiff cars.

The VW is firmer, but I've been very surprised with the seats. Very supportive and comfy for me. Big test is week after next, 600 mile return trip up Norf.

It surely has to be a Jag XF for you, plenty of XF-R bits available to make it more you.  :)
Logged

TheBoy

  • Administrator
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Brackley, Northants
  • Posts: 105932
  • I Like Lockdown
    • Whatever Starts
    • View Profile
Re: The Omega Replacement conundrum, Part 2
« Reply #122 on: 02 October 2016, 19:09:38 »

The VW is firmer, but I've been very surprised with the seats. Very supportive and comfy for me.
Not that I'd get a VW anyway, but the Passats I've driven have caused discomfort, far too much discomfort to even entertain the idea.
Logged
Grumpy old man

citroenguy

  • Junior Member
  • **
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Sweden
  • Posts: 201
    • 2005 Citroën C5 2.0SX
    • View Profile
Re: The Omega Replacement conundrum, Part 2
« Reply #123 on: 02 October 2016, 19:10:15 »

The newr ones (2008-on) handle better due to a better chassis with double wishbone up front and multilink rear. And all of them with hydractive has the sport mode for the suspension. Whitch that V6 you owned also had. Engaging the sport mode stiffens it up a bit.
Logged
124k on the C5
I like Omegas Senators and all other big 90´s euro saloons.
Previous motors: 3x Rover 600s, Citroën ZX, Volvo 850

tunnie

  • Get A Life!!
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Surrey
  • Posts: 37523
    • Zafira Tourer & BMW 435i
    • View Profile
Re: The Omega Replacement conundrum, Part 2
« Reply #124 on: 02 October 2016, 19:18:22 »

The VW is firmer, but I've been very surprised with the seats. Very supportive and comfy for me.
Not that I'd get a VW anyway, but the Passats I've driven have caused discomfort, far too much discomfort to even entertain the idea.

Try one with GT spec Leather  :y
Logged

TheBoy

  • Administrator
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Brackley, Northants
  • Posts: 105932
  • I Like Lockdown
    • Whatever Starts
    • View Profile
Re: The Omega Replacement conundrum, Part 2
« Reply #125 on: 02 October 2016, 19:50:48 »

The VW is firmer, but I've been very surprised with the seats. Very supportive and comfy for me.
Not that I'd get a VW anyway, but the Passats I've driven have caused discomfort, far too much discomfort to even entertain the idea.

Try one with GT spec Leather  :y
I think even if I put my armchair in, it wouldn't overcome the harshness of the chassis.

I'd always prefer decent cloth, like vulgarlure :)
Logged
Grumpy old man

ronnyd

  • Omega Lord
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Bury St Edmunds Suffolk
  • Posts: 8626
    • Vectra 1.8 SRI Silver
    • View Profile
Re: The Omega Replacement conundrum, Part 2
« Reply #126 on: 02 October 2016, 22:17:45 »

I find Frog cars a bit quirky to be honest and have also vowed never to have a Renault after a traumatic car hire experience  >:(
Logged

TheBoy

  • Administrator
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Brackley, Northants
  • Posts: 105932
  • I Like Lockdown
    • Whatever Starts
    • View Profile
Re: The Omega Replacement conundrum, Part 2
« Reply #127 on: 03 October 2016, 08:14:12 »

I find Frog cars a bit quirky to be honest and have also vowed never to have a Renault after a traumatic car hire experience  >:(
I grew up with big Citroens, as Dad liked them, so their weirdness was all normal to me.  Also taught me a lot about electrics, as being French, the little electric pixies were always on strike ;D
Logged
Grumpy old man

Lazydocker

  • Omega Queen
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Woodbridge, Suffolk
  • Posts: 18848
  • Constantly Bullied by a certain Admin
    • View Profile
Re: The Omega Replacement conundrum, Part 2
« Reply #128 on: 03 October 2016, 18:36:05 »

I suspect I will have little say in my next car... but it might be new ::)
Logged
Whatever it is... I didn't do it

tunnie

  • Get A Life!!
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Surrey
  • Posts: 37523
    • Zafira Tourer & BMW 435i
    • View Profile
Re: The Omega Replacement conundrum, Part 2
« Reply #129 on: 04 October 2016, 21:18:53 »

Plenty out there, just on your ban list:

Merc E350 CDI/CLS. (Driven these, CLS was very smooth)
Merc S320 CDI
BMW 535d
BMW 730d
Audi A8 4.0 TD
Porker Turbo (911's)
Jag XF's 3.0d
Jag XJ 2.7d


But all on your banned lised  :D

Logged

Entwood

  • Omega Queen
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • North Wiltshire
  • Posts: 19566
  • My Old 3.2 V6 Elite (LPG)
    • Audi A6 Allroad 3.0 DTI
    • View Profile
Re: The Omega Replacement conundrum, Part 2
« Reply #130 on: 04 October 2016, 21:28:37 »

Plenty out there, just on your ban list:

Merc E350 CDI/CLS. (Driven these, CLS was very smooth)
Merc S320 CDI
BMW 535d
BMW 730d
Audi A8 4.0 TD
Porker Turbo (911's)
Jag XF's 3.0d
Jag XJ 2.7d


But all on your banned lised  :D

Should be on everyone's banned list ... only things should burn fuel oil are boats and trucks ....dirty, smelly, polluting POS .... :(
Logged

tunnie

  • Get A Life!!
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Surrey
  • Posts: 37523
    • Zafira Tourer & BMW 435i
    • View Profile
Re: The Omega Replacement conundrum, Part 2
« Reply #131 on: 04 October 2016, 22:33:22 »

You can't paint diesel with a brush like that, try driving a recent shape Jag XJ V6 Diesel.

Very happy with my Derv  :y

Over 600 on current tank of juice, range says over 100 left,  suits my driving style of low down torque. Mid range it's not bad, no slouch. Motorway at 70 in 6th just 1,200 rpm. So great cruiser :)

Father Ts XF diesel is very nice too.

What is a POS, is the 3.2 engine.  :P

It's not that fast, it's terrible on fuel, DBW V6 idle is rubbish. 3.0 V6 was always far better engine, least that was economical given its power. 3.2 is so much worse, but for what? No gains.
Logged

Entwood

  • Omega Queen
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • North Wiltshire
  • Posts: 19566
  • My Old 3.2 V6 Elite (LPG)
    • Audi A6 Allroad 3.0 DTI
    • View Profile
Re: The Omega Replacement conundrum, Part 2
« Reply #132 on: 04 October 2016, 22:57:24 »

You can't paint diesel with a brush like that, try driving a recent shape Jag XJ V6 Diesel.

Very happy with my Derv  :y

Over 600 on current tank of juice, range says over 100 left,  suits my driving style of low down torque. Mid range it's not bad, no slouch. Motorway at 70 in 6th just 1,200 rpm. So great cruiser :)

Father Ts XF diesel is very nice too.

What is a POS, is the 3.2 engine.  :P

It's not that fast, it's terrible on fuel, DBW V6 idle is rubbish. 3.0 V6 was always far better engine, least that was economical given its power. 3.2 is so much worse, but for what? No gains.

Oh I can ..

Dirty - requires a bloody great DPF to trap the contamination .. which then burns itself clean so releasing all the contamination on to the poor unsuspecting public, and only if you drive it in a very certain way, otherwise it doesn't work and the system fails .. at great expense

Smelly - No explanation needed .. fuel oil stinks

Polluting - not withstanding the DPF matter .. the NOx levels are so high that the modern engine has to have piss added to it to make it legal ....and if you run out of piss it won't start !!

and even then VW had to lie, lie, and lie again to pass the emissions tests .. so millions of vehicles just like yours are pumping out pollution ...had your recall yet ??  :)

and you say fuel oil is good ????

:)
Logged

Mr.OmegaMan

  • Omega Baron
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Middle of nowhere
  • Posts: 4176
    • 3.2 Elite , CLS500
    • View Profile
Re: The Omega Replacement conundrum, Part 2
« Reply #133 on: 04 October 2016, 23:07:11 »

It's a bit unfair to compare the Omega with anything other than what was available at the same time as the Omega....
Logged

Doctor Gollum

  • Get A Life!!
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • In a colds and darks puddleses
  • Posts: 28203
  • If you can't eat them, join them...
    • Feetses.
    • View Profile
Logged
Onanists always think outside the box.
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 [9] 10 11 12 13   Go Up
 

Page created in 0.039 seconds with 21 queries.