Omega Owners Forum

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  

News:

Search the maintenance guides for answers to 99.999% of Omega questions

Pages: 1 [2]  All   Go Down

Author Topic: 2.2 sport ?  (Read 4272 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Doctor Gollum

  • Get A Life!!
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • In a colds and darks puddleses
  • Posts: 28237
  • If you can't eat them, join them...
    • Feetses.
    • View Profile
Re: 2.2 sport ?
« Reply #15 on: 01 March 2017, 01:29:27 »

Nothing wrong with any of that ;)
Logged
Onanists always think outside the box.

the alarming man

  • Omega Baron
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • medway kent
  • Posts: 3641
    • disco V8
    • View Profile
Re: 2.2 sport ?
« Reply #16 on: 01 March 2017, 19:51:27 »

no it was no rocket but it was no slouch either the 2.2 is underated imho no not as quick as a 3.2 but then that would be due to the fact it is a 2.2  :y
Logged
'the more people i meet...the more i like the dog'

The whole problem with the world is that fools and fanatics are always so certain of themselves, but wiser people so full of doubts.

Doctor Gollum

  • Get A Life!!
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • In a colds and darks puddleses
  • Posts: 28237
  • If you can't eat them, join them...
    • Feetses.
    • View Profile
Re: 2.2 sport ?
« Reply #17 on: 01 March 2017, 19:58:03 »

no it was no rocket but it was no slouch either the 2.2 is underated imho no not as quick as a 3.2 but then that would be due to the fact it is a 2.2  :y
It's actually quite a rev happy engine... trouble is because most are autos no one actually thinks it's any good because they've not driven a manual one ::)

Add in the LSC and it's a capable car 8)
Logged
Onanists always think outside the box.

citroenguy

  • Junior Member
  • **
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Sweden
  • Posts: 201
    • 2005 Citroën C5 2.0SX
    • View Profile
Re: 2.2 sport ?
« Reply #18 on: 01 March 2017, 20:11:21 »

On cheap tyres a manual 2.2 can do skids in roundabouts  :y :D
Logged
124k on the C5
I like Omegas Senators and all other big 90´s euro saloons.
Previous motors: 3x Rover 600s, Citroën ZX, Volvo 850

STEMO

  • Guest
Re: 2.2 sport ?
« Reply #19 on: 01 March 2017, 20:36:58 »

On cheap tyres a manual 2.2 can do skids in roundabouts  :y :D
In Sweden anything can do skids on roundabouts  ;D
Logged

citroenguy

  • Junior Member
  • **
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Sweden
  • Posts: 201
    • 2005 Citroën C5 2.0SX
    • View Profile
Re: 2.2 sport ?
« Reply #20 on: 02 March 2017, 05:58:35 »

On cheap tyres a manual 2.2 can do skids in roundabouts  :y :D
In Sweden anything can do skids on roundabouts  ;D

That was in the summer, dry road :D
Logged
124k on the C5
I like Omegas Senators and all other big 90´s euro saloons.
Previous motors: 3x Rover 600s, Citroën ZX, Volvo 850

TheBoy

  • Administrator
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Brackley, Northants
  • Posts: 105959
  • I Like Lockdown
    • Whatever Starts
    • View Profile
Re: 2.2 sport ?
« Reply #21 on: 02 March 2017, 18:32:36 »

no it was no rocket but it was no slouch either the 2.2 is underated imho no not as quick as a 3.2 but then that would be due to the fact it is a 2.2  :y
It's actually quite a rev happy engine... trouble is because most are autos no one actually thinks it's any good because they've not driven a manual one ::)

Add in the LSC and it's a capable car 8)
Actually one of the quickest, and definitely the best, 2.2's I've driven was an Auto, and belonged to our resident Pikey Pensioner, AA.
Logged
Grumpy old man

the alarming man

  • Omega Baron
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • medway kent
  • Posts: 3641
    • disco V8
    • View Profile
Re: 2.2 sport ?
« Reply #22 on: 02 March 2017, 22:23:50 »

i had two and tbh they were not too bad.....but after a drive with Essex Big Al and his 3.2 I could be persuaded ;D :y
Logged
'the more people i meet...the more i like the dog'

The whole problem with the world is that fools and fanatics are always so certain of themselves, but wiser people so full of doubts.

Pmacca2000

  • Intermediate Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Midlands
  • Posts: 341
    • Omega CD
    • View Profile
Re: 2.2 sport ?
« Reply #23 on: 03 March 2017, 04:50:48 »

The sport was basically a budget MV6 to shift the last of the line cars, I've never driven a 2.2 or sport but guess the handling makes up for any lack in power ?
Logged
Pmacca, living the dream since 1995

Doctor Gollum

  • Get A Life!!
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • In a colds and darks puddleses
  • Posts: 28237
  • If you can't eat them, join them...
    • Feetses.
    • View Profile
Re: 2.2 sport ?
« Reply #24 on: 03 March 2017, 06:46:21 »

The sport was basically a budget MV6 to shift the last of the line cars, I've never driven a 2.2 or sport but guess the handling makes up for any lack in power ?
All tosh...

It was sold as an established part of the range... suspension, whilst LSC, has different front spring weights to both the MV6 and the other 2.2 models... hardly a parts bin special. The 2.2 isn't lacking in power, it simply requires a bit more winding up. As for handling, cars with either LSC or Plod heavy duty are far better to drive hard than the Elite... that said, a sorted and well set up Omega is a rewarding car to drive regardless of spec/engine.
« Last Edit: 03 March 2017, 06:54:00 by Doctor Gollum »
Logged
Onanists always think outside the box.

TheBoy

  • Administrator
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Brackley, Northants
  • Posts: 105959
  • I Like Lockdown
    • Whatever Starts
    • View Profile
Re: 2.2 sport ?
« Reply #25 on: 03 March 2017, 08:17:47 »

The 2.2 isn't lacking in power
Whilst it can be made to get going - I tried reasonably successfully for about 6 miles to keep a Tuscan honest when I was driving tunnie's old shed, though he was being unlucky with traffic, and was being a pussy in the roundabouts - 140bhp in a 1.7t tank really is a bit under powered for enthusiastic driving, even if you are always wringing its neck.  Thats most certainly not saying it can't be fun though.
Logged
Grumpy old man

tunnie

  • Get A Life!!
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Surrey
  • Posts: 37526
    • Zafira Tourer & BMW 435i
    • View Profile
Re: 2.2 sport ?
« Reply #26 on: 03 March 2017, 09:42:53 »

I ran my 2.2 for 11 years, mine was in manual form so bit more fun than Auto's. My replacement VW has a lot to live up to!

2.2 is more than enough go for the average driver, but the 3.2 is just effortless. My 2.2 always would idle far better than 3.2, the DBW V6's are a bit lumpy at idle.  :(

I've still got my 2.2, but it's SORN and been unused for over 6 months, I think I'm going to have to donate it to the fire station in very near future.  :'(
Logged

TheBoy

  • Administrator
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Brackley, Northants
  • Posts: 105959
  • I Like Lockdown
    • Whatever Starts
    • View Profile
Re: 2.2 sport ?
« Reply #27 on: 03 March 2017, 12:28:35 »

but it's SORN and been unused for over 6 months, I think I'm going to have to donate it to the fire station in very near future.  :'(
Yes, they don't like being left unused outside.
Logged
Grumpy old man
Pages: 1 [2]  All   Go Up
 

Page created in 0.039 seconds with 22 queries.