76
General Car Chat / Ls1
« on: 24 June 2021, 12:50:27 »
334044548261 Ebay
- 25 April 2024, 15:09:59
- Welcome, Guest
News:
Search the maintenance guides for answers to 99.999% of Omega questions
Show Posts
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
77
General Discussion Area / M&S
« on: 24 June 2021, 10:53:07 »
Any thought on this magnificent idea,
https://twitter.com/RichardHilton1/status/1407383920946167812?s=08
What on earth are they thinking?
https://twitter.com/RichardHilton1/status/1407383920946167812?s=08
What on earth are they thinking?
78
General Discussion Area / Black and white question
« on: 15 June 2021, 22:54:15 »
Just thinking today…. How are coloureds allowed to call us white being as we can’t call them black?
79
General Discussion Area / Good enough for our army but......
« on: 04 June 2021, 10:53:16 »
Napier Barracks: Asylum seekers win legal challenge over ‘squalid’ accommodation
Six asylum seekers who brought a legal case against the Home Office for “unsafe” and “squalid” conditions at a former army barracks in Kent have won their High Court case.
The group of men, all said to be “survivors of torture and/or human trafficking”, were formerly housed at Napier Barracks, and argued that conditions at the camp posed “real and immediate risks to life and of ill-treatment”.
On Thursday Mr Justice Linden ruled in the men’s favour and found that the accommodation failed to meet a “minimum standard” and that the Home Office acted unlawfully when deciding the former military camp was appropriate.
He said: “Whether on the basis of the issues of Covid or fire safety taken in isolation, or looking at the cumulative effect of the decision making about, and the conditions in, the barracks, I do not accept that the accommodation there ensured a standard of living which was adequate for the health of the claimants.
“Insofar as the defendant considered that the accommodation was adequate for their needs, that view was irrational.”
During a two-day hearing in April, the men’s lawyers said that accommodating asylum seekers at the “squalid” barracks was a breach of their human rights and could amount to false imprisonment.
Mr Justice Linden added that while “adequacy” was a low standard, Napier Barracks had failed during the time the six asylum seekers were housed there.
The judge referenced Covid-19 spread and overcrowding, a lack of ventilation, as well as the “detention-like” setting for the men, who were not meant to be detained.
He said: “What is at issue here is accommodation in which they were supposed to live voluntarily pending a determination of their applications for asylum.
“When this is considered, a decision that accommodation in a detention-like setting - a site enclosed by a perimeter fence topped with barbed wire, access to which is through padlocked gates guarded by uniformed security personnel - will be adequate for their needs, begins to look questionable.”
More to follow...
Six asylum seekers who brought a legal case against the Home Office for “unsafe” and “squalid” conditions at a former army barracks in Kent have won their High Court case.
The group of men, all said to be “survivors of torture and/or human trafficking”, were formerly housed at Napier Barracks, and argued that conditions at the camp posed “real and immediate risks to life and of ill-treatment”.
On Thursday Mr Justice Linden ruled in the men’s favour and found that the accommodation failed to meet a “minimum standard” and that the Home Office acted unlawfully when deciding the former military camp was appropriate.
He said: “Whether on the basis of the issues of Covid or fire safety taken in isolation, or looking at the cumulative effect of the decision making about, and the conditions in, the barracks, I do not accept that the accommodation there ensured a standard of living which was adequate for the health of the claimants.
“Insofar as the defendant considered that the accommodation was adequate for their needs, that view was irrational.”
During a two-day hearing in April, the men’s lawyers said that accommodating asylum seekers at the “squalid” barracks was a breach of their human rights and could amount to false imprisonment.
Mr Justice Linden added that while “adequacy” was a low standard, Napier Barracks had failed during the time the six asylum seekers were housed there.
The judge referenced Covid-19 spread and overcrowding, a lack of ventilation, as well as the “detention-like” setting for the men, who were not meant to be detained.
He said: “What is at issue here is accommodation in which they were supposed to live voluntarily pending a determination of their applications for asylum.
“When this is considered, a decision that accommodation in a detention-like setting - a site enclosed by a perimeter fence topped with barbed wire, access to which is through padlocked gates guarded by uniformed security personnel - will be adequate for their needs, begins to look questionable.”
More to follow...
80
General Discussion Area / Abbot🤬
« on: 27 May 2021, 00:18:43 »
This stupid bloody women is at it again
https://www.google.co.uk/amp/s/www.spiked-online.com/2021/05/25/diane-abbott-is-shamelessly-exploiting-a-tragedy/amp/
https://www.google.co.uk/amp/s/www.spiked-online.com/2021/05/25/diane-abbott-is-shamelessly-exploiting-a-tragedy/amp/
82
General Discussion Area / Police vs toddler
« on: 28 March 2021, 19:29:30 »
Stumbled on to this earlier, WTF is wrong with these people good job it wasn’t one of mine they done it to.
https://apple.news/A4tXkXq6TQQCX1zXpW15R2w
https://apple.news/A4tXkXq6TQQCX1zXpW15R2w
83
General Discussion Area / Shares
« on: 11 February 2021, 14:25:55 »
Anybody into them on here at the moment.... Argo blockchain seem to be looking good.
85
General Discussion Area / More madness
« on: 10 February 2021, 12:49:20 »
Just saw this
https://mobile.twitter.com/LozzaFox/status/1359246264475545600?s=1001
What the hell next? It’s almost funny
https://mobile.twitter.com/LozzaFox/status/1359246264475545600?s=1001
What the hell next? It’s almost funny
86
General Discussion Area / London stabbings
« on: 07 February 2021, 17:40:59 »
I see mr Khan is planning to remove statues again. Isn’t there anything more important to concentrate on in that part of the country?
87
General Discussion Area / Charles Endell Esquire.
« on: 17 January 2021, 17:08:02 »
Just started watching this series again. Really enjoying it, and the adverts 
88
General Discussion Area / Will Reeve
« on: 23 November 2020, 18:59:00 »
Anyone here know Will Reeve?... how to contact him Can’t get hold of him.
89
General Discussion Area / Oops she’s done it again
« on: 16 November 2020, 10:21:35 »
Labour MP Diane Abbott apologises for appearing alongside deniers of China’s persecution of Uyghur Muslims
Must be keeping her on just for the entertainment value, what an arsehole ...,,
https://www.google.co.uk/amp/s/news.sky.com/story/amp/diane-abbott-apologises-for-appearing-alongside-chinese-human-rights-abuse-denier-12133165
Must be keeping her on just for the entertainment value, what an arsehole ...,,
https://www.google.co.uk/amp/s/news.sky.com/story/amp/diane-abbott-apologises-for-appearing-alongside-chinese-human-rights-abuse-denier-12133165
90
General Car Chat / Good brakes
« on: 01 September 2020, 23:20:48 »
Had to pull up very quick earlier on. Must say I was very impressed how quickly and safely I stopped I’m using pagid pads. These Omegas are great stoppers.