Omega Owners Forum

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  

News:

Search the maintenance guides for answers to 99.999% of Omega questions

Pages: 1 [2]  All   Go Down

Author Topic: The 3.2's really are crap on fuel  (Read 4340 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

tigers_gonads

  • Omega Lord
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Kinston Upon Hull
  • Posts: 8592
  • Driving a Honda CR-V which doesn't smell of pee
    • Honda CR-V
    • View Profile
Re: The 3.2's really are crap on fuel
« Reply #15 on: 09 June 2015, 14:55:00 »

Tell me about it  ::)
Just been to see a mate / customer who has just traded his 911 GT3 in for a 09 plate Carrera S
Picked it up in jock land and came back at a fair old whack.
Brimmed the tank when he got back to find it had done 27.3 mpg  :o
Logged

Kevin Wood

  • Global Moderator
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Alton, Hampshire
  • Posts: 36284
    • Jaguar XE 25t, Westfield
    • View Profile
Re: The 3.2's really are crap on fuel
« Reply #16 on: 09 June 2015, 15:42:31 »

About 50 in top ::)

I rekon Tunster would get away the top gear alone. ;)

I had a ride in one of 2woody's when half the gearbox was u/s and it "didn't appear to be holding it back". :o
Almost impossible to stall, even just letting the clutch out in 5th. Imagine that and with a throttle as well. ;D

I had a ride in it when it had ALL its gears. JeeZUS! with Firm and compliant ride. Wamo brakes. Makes the omega look pathetic tbh.

But it did hatch a cunning plan. Some time ago now though. :-[

And with a big enough wallet and ls2 heads if you can find them good for any amount of tuning.


....sorry this is a Tunnie thread. Right? :-\

Yes, I had a ride in its' home turf in Northumberland. Thought we were going to get intimate with the hedge at times but no... :o Soundtrack to raise the dead too. :D
Logged
Tech2 services currently available. See TheBoy's price list: http://theboy.omegaowners.com/

zirk

  • Omega Queen
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Epping Forest
  • Posts: 11431
  • 3.2 Manual Special Saloon ReMapped and LPG'd and
    • 3.2 Manual Special Estate
    • View Profile
Re: The 3.2's really are crap on fuel
« Reply #17 on: 09 June 2015, 18:38:23 »

3.0 Manual is what you need over a 3.2, chip the 3.0, widened Throttle Bodies and a half decent SS Sports Exhaust System and you already up to or well over the 3.2 Power and a lot better MPG, used to get 28 mpg in town on average and 35 mpg on a run on my old MV6, all the 3.2 Ive had cant touch them figures, even a 2.6 Manual will struggle.
« Last Edit: 09 June 2015, 18:40:42 by zirk »
Logged

The Sheriff

  • Guest
Re: The 3.2's really are crap on fuel
« Reply #18 on: 09 June 2015, 18:55:26 »

Or....just buy a car that was built to go fast.
Logged

kev2b4

  • Junior Member
  • **
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Luton, Beds
  • Posts: 249
    • 2.5 CDX ,2.5 tourer
    • View Profile
Re: The 3.2's really are crap on fuel
« Reply #19 on: 09 June 2015, 19:13:53 »

Daowoo turboed?
Logged

chrisgixer

  • Omega Baron
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Woking ham
  • Posts: 2616
  • Banned
    • Irmscher 3.2 Elite lpg
    • View Profile
Re: The 3.2's really are crap on fuel
« Reply #20 on: 09 June 2015, 20:01:20 »

Just. The smallest word ever used to wipe out an opinion with absolutely no clue behind issue what so ever. Dismissive and shows no understanding. Must be Stmo.

[zooms out] yep, Stmo it is [zooms back in for the rest of my guess the poster game] ;D
Logged

The Sheriff

  • Guest
Re: The 3.2's really are crap on fuel
« Reply #21 on: 09 June 2015, 20:22:40 »

Just. The smallest word ever used to wipe out an opinion with absolutely no clue behind issue what so ever. Dismissive and shows no understanding. Must be Stmo.

[zooms out] yep, Stmo it is [zooms back in for the rest of my guess the poster game] ;D
Just.......fick off then. ;D
Logged

TheBoy

  • Administrator
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Brackley, Northants
  • Posts: 105981
  • I Like Lockdown
    • Whatever Starts
    • View Profile
Re: The 3.2's really are crap on fuel
« Reply #23 on: 09 June 2015, 20:57:21 »

http://www.pistonheads.com/classifieds/used-cars/vauxhall/vxr8/vauxhall-vxr8-2007/4291705



That VXR8 is not far off the average (9th pic) I get from the 3.2.

Might as well get a VXR8. Cost same in fuel  ::)
To quote yourself, £12k is a LOT of fuel ;)

Driven sedately at a constant speed, they can return 25+ mpg.  Given your commute, I think you'd struggle to get 15mpg.
Logged
Grumpy old man

tunnie

  • Get A Life!!
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Surrey
  • Posts: 37526
    • Zafira Tourer & BMW 435i
    • View Profile
Re: The 3.2's really are crap on fuel
« Reply #24 on: 09 June 2015, 21:03:25 »

Or...just buy something like this:
http://www.autotrader.co.uk/classified/advert/201505153489307/sort/atcustom/model/s-type/onesearchad/used/make/jaguar/usedcars/page/4/engine-size-cars/3l_to_3-9l/channel/cars/radius/1500/postcode/s727na?logcode=p

Under £2K and very quick.

I know you are used to 1.4, but a 3.0 V6 in S Type won't be fast ;)

The V8 maybe, but I'd rather have a supercharged XJ :)
Logged

tunnie

  • Get A Life!!
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Surrey
  • Posts: 37526
    • Zafira Tourer & BMW 435i
    • View Profile
Re: The 3.2's really are crap on fuel
« Reply #25 on: 09 June 2015, 21:05:35 »

http://www.pistonheads.com/classifieds/used-cars/vauxhall/vxr8/vauxhall-vxr8-2007/4291705



That VXR8 is not far off the average (9th pic) I get from the 3.2.

Might as well get a VXR8. Cost same in fuel  ::)
To quote yourself, £12k is a LOT of fuel ;)

Driven sedately at a constant speed, they can return 25+ mpg.  Given your commute, I think you'd struggle to get 15mpg.

I reckon low 20's could be done. :)
Logged

Steve B

  • Omega Baron
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Leicestershire
  • Posts: 3638
    • '52' MV6 3.2 Saloon
    • View Profile
Re: The 3.2's really are crap on fuel
« Reply #26 on: 09 June 2015, 21:09:52 »

What mpg do these bikes give tunnie ?  Like the one in your pic.. Just wondered  :-\
Logged

TheBoy

  • Administrator
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Brackley, Northants
  • Posts: 105981
  • I Like Lockdown
    • Whatever Starts
    • View Profile
Re: The 3.2's really are crap on fuel
« Reply #27 on: 09 June 2015, 21:11:46 »

http://www.pistonheads.com/classifieds/used-cars/vauxhall/vxr8/vauxhall-vxr8-2007/4291705



That VXR8 is not far off the average (9th pic) I get from the 3.2.

Might as well get a VXR8. Cost same in fuel  ::)
To quote yourself, £12k is a LOT of fuel ;)

Driven sedately at a constant speed, they can return 25+ mpg.  Given your commute, I think you'd struggle to get 15mpg.

I reckon low 20's could be done. :)
I'm the first to admit that the 3.2 is absolutely shocking on economy (and power delivery, but that's not relevant), but if you reckon you can get 20mpg from a 6l V8 on a journey that will never be economical, you'll easily get 25 from the 3.2

I think the official figures for the 6.2 VXR8 is high teens?
Logged
Grumpy old man

TheBoy

  • Administrator
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Brackley, Northants
  • Posts: 105981
  • I Like Lockdown
    • Whatever Starts
    • View Profile
Re: The 3.2's really are crap on fuel
« Reply #28 on: 09 June 2015, 21:12:16 »

What mpg do these bikes give tunnie ?  Like the one in your pic.. Just wondered  :-\
Should be good for mid 40s if not ragged.
Logged
Grumpy old man

tunnie

  • Get A Life!!
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Surrey
  • Posts: 37526
    • Zafira Tourer & BMW 435i
    • View Profile
Re: The 3.2's really are crap on fuel
« Reply #29 on: 09 June 2015, 21:24:07 »

What mpg do these bikes give tunnie ?  Like the one in your pic.. Just wondered  :-\
Should be good for mid 40s if not ragged.

Try mid 50's. :y :y
 
On my commute to London the bike easily averages 54+mpg

The 2.2 does about 28 on gas, 3.2 does about 25 on petrol.

Bike I leave around 9am for work, car, 7am due to traffic and parking. Its good run in the car, M3/M25/Heathrow T5 Jc/Hatton Cross.  25 miles in 45 mins.
Logged
Pages: 1 [2]  All   Go Up
 

Page created in 0.044 seconds with 22 queries.