Omega Owners Forum

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  

News:

Search the maintenance guides for answers to 99.999% of Omega questions

Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 ... 12   Go Down

Author Topic: Omega remapping  (Read 25426 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Anthony in Madrid

  • Intermediate Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Valencia, Spain
  • Posts: 262
  • It's there...Go get it!
    • 1994 2.5 V6 170 BHP
    • View Profile
Re: Omega remapping
« Reply #15 on: 03 November 2014, 15:45:12 »

FORGET IT!

Not worth messing around with.  If you want a faster Omega, buy a faster Omega.

They come no quicker than 3.2 V6, in Black obviously.  :-X

Is the 3.2 Faster than an MV6???
Logged
Still learning...Be nice!

TheBoy

  • Administrator
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Brackley, Northants
  • Posts: 105932
  • I Like Lockdown
    • Whatever Starts
    • View Profile
Re: Omega remapping
« Reply #16 on: 03 November 2014, 18:00:36 »

FORGET IT!

Not worth messing around with.  If you want a faster Omega, buy a faster Omega.

They come no quicker than 3.2 V6, in Black obviously.  :-X

Is the 3.2 Faster than an MV6???
Its faster than the 2.6 MV6, but slower than the 3.0 MV6. Its exactly the same speed as the 3.2 MV6, obviously.
Logged
Grumpy old man

TheBoy

  • Administrator
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Brackley, Northants
  • Posts: 105932
  • I Like Lockdown
    • Whatever Starts
    • View Profile
Re: Omega remapping
« Reply #17 on: 03 November 2014, 18:03:29 »

Webby, I've owned a 3.0l and a 2.5 with G cams and a Superchip performance chip at the same time.  I don't give a rats arse what the claims are, the 2.5 is absolutely nowhere near the 3.0l in performance and drivability stakes. And because I had to rag the nads off it everywhere, no more economical. Well, until I killed it  :-[
Logged
Grumpy old man

serek

  • Omega Knight
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • huntingdon
  • Posts: 1992
    • 3.2 mv6
    • View Profile
Re: Omega remapping
« Reply #18 on: 03 November 2014, 18:23:43 »

i would say before you start wasting money on chip or remap , get 4.22 diff that will make more difference and only cost about 50 notes

Anthony in Madrid

  • Intermediate Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Valencia, Spain
  • Posts: 262
  • It's there...Go get it!
    • 1994 2.5 V6 170 BHP
    • View Profile
Re: Omega remapping
« Reply #19 on: 03 November 2014, 19:06:09 »

i would say before you start wasting money on chip or remap , get 4.22 diff that will make more difference and only cost about 50 notes

What do you mean by that?
Cheers
Ant
Logged
Still learning...Be nice!

TheBoy

  • Administrator
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Brackley, Northants
  • Posts: 105932
  • I Like Lockdown
    • Whatever Starts
    • View Profile
Re: Omega remapping
« Reply #20 on: 03 November 2014, 19:14:15 »

i would say before you start wasting money on chip or remap , get 4.22 diff that will make more difference and only cost about 50 notes

What do you mean by that?
Cheers
Ant
Lowers the gearing to increase acceleration. There are different Omega differentials available
Logged
Grumpy old man

chrisgixer

  • Guest
Re: Omega remapping
« Reply #21 on: 03 November 2014, 20:36:00 »

4.22 diff from a 2.6.

Lowers the gearing for acceleration and reaches top speed quicker. However it also raises the engine speed at cruising speed by about 400rpm.... Which doesn't sound much but could grate the nerves a little for some on a long journey.
Logged

pauls

  • Omega Baron
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • By the sea minehead
  • Posts: 2091
    • Bmw x3
    • View Profile
Re: Omega remapping
« Reply #22 on: 03 November 2014, 21:45:38 »

My 2.6 which is Black by the way does seem to getup and go quick enough :y
Logged
..

Phil

  • Senior Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • 0
  • Posts: 799
    • View Profile
Re: Omega remapping
« Reply #23 on: 04 November 2014, 08:28:10 »

Not wanting to get into a big row about the subject,but I have a 3.2 with a remap showing as some would question an optimistic rolling road read out at 241 BHP......BUT!! having it done with a reputable company and certainly not the cheapo Egay diy crap from Eastern Europe :-\

And yet my old 3ltr MV6 with its £40 ebay chip produced 247bhp on a rolling road. It was in Total Vauxhall at the time, however I don't think it was right

It did have improved fuel economy and did approx 50k with no issues, so i would say, in this case with the n/a V6, you are better off saving money and buying a cheap ebay chip

*edited to add*

It was Polar Sea Blue metalic so nearly black, hence why it was so powerful
« Last Edit: 04 November 2014, 08:32:01 by Phil »
Logged

Webby the Bear

  • Omega Queen
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Northampton
  • Posts: 12722
    • 2000 (W Reg.) 2.5 V6 CD
    • View Profile
Re: Omega remapping
« Reply #24 on: 04 November 2014, 09:40:46 »

Awesome input guys. Thanks.

Apologies i've not added to this recently but been more concerned with the coolant leak i created lol touch wood thats sorted now and if it is then i think ill speak to superchips.

phil, i've watched a ''mythbuster'' video on those cheap egay ones and it showed the one they brought for testing did nothing. not saying thats the case for all obviously. but certainly some out there are dodgy and, having brought some rubbish from egay of late, i think id rather spend the extra and know its a good un from reputable comp.

not arguing, just my opinion :)
Logged
RIP Paul Lovejoy

Webby the Bear

  • Omega Queen
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Northampton
  • Posts: 12722
    • 2000 (W Reg.) 2.5 V6 CD
    • View Profile
Re: Omega remapping
« Reply #25 on: 04 November 2014, 09:45:50 »

Webby, I've owned a 3.0l and a 2.5 with G cams and a Superchip performance chip at the same time.  I don't give a rats arse what the claims are, the 2.5 is absolutely nowhere near the 3.0l in performance and drivability stakes. And because I had to rag the nads off it everywhere, no more economical. Well, until I killed it  :-[

Fair play mate. but i'm just looking to get the best out of the 2.5 with no flat spots. if that was the case id be really pleased with it
Logged
RIP Paul Lovejoy

Anthony in Madrid

  • Intermediate Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Valencia, Spain
  • Posts: 262
  • It's there...Go get it!
    • 1994 2.5 V6 170 BHP
    • View Profile
Re: Omega remapping
« Reply #26 on: 04 November 2014, 09:55:21 »

i would say before you start wasting money on chip or remap , get 4.22 diff that will make more difference and only cost about 50 notes

What do you mean by that?
Cheers
Ant
Lowers the gearing to increase acceleration. There are different Omega differentials available

And is that an easy job to do?
Logged
Still learning...Be nice!

Anthony in Madrid

  • Intermediate Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Valencia, Spain
  • Posts: 262
  • It's there...Go get it!
    • 1994 2.5 V6 170 BHP
    • View Profile
Re: Omega remapping
« Reply #27 on: 04 November 2014, 09:56:39 »

4.22 diff from a 2.6.

Lowers the gearing for acceleration and reaches top speed quicker. However it also raises the engine speed at cruising speed by about 400rpm.... Which doesn't sound much but could grate the nerves a little for some on a long journey.

Is that an easy job to do?
Logged
Still learning...Be nice!

zirk

  • Omega Queen
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Epping Forest
  • Posts: 11431
  • 3.2 Manual Special Saloon ReMapped and LPG'd and
    • 3.2 Manual Special Estate
    • View Profile
Re: Omega remapping
« Reply #28 on: 04 November 2014, 11:31:02 »

4.22 diff from a 2.6.

Lowers the gearing for acceleration and reaches top speed quicker. However it also raises the engine speed at cruising speed by about 400rpm.... Which doesn't sound much but could grate the nerves a little for some on a long journey.

Is that an easy job to do?
Wouldn't say easy, but well do-able with the rear of the car lifted.

Check your ratio first though, yours being a 1994 2.5 will probably follow the 3.0 ratios, 3.7 for Manual and 3.9 for Auto, they changed the 2.5 around 1998 from memory.

if Manual with 3.7 I personally wouldn't recommend fitting a 4.22 to it.
Logged

Anthony in Madrid

  • Intermediate Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Valencia, Spain
  • Posts: 262
  • It's there...Go get it!
    • 1994 2.5 V6 170 BHP
    • View Profile
Re: Omega remapping
« Reply #29 on: 04 November 2014, 15:24:53 »

4.22 diff from a 2.6.

Lowers the gearing for acceleration and reaches top speed quicker. However it also raises the engine speed at cruising speed by about 400rpm.... Which doesn't sound much but could grate the nerves a little for some on a long journey.

Is that an easy job to do?
Wouldn't say easy, but well do-able with the rear of the car lifted.

Check your ratio first though, yours being a 1994 2.5 will probably follow the 3.0 ratios, 3.7 for Manual and 3.9 for Auto, they changed the 2.5 around 1998 from memory.

if Manual with 3.7 I personally wouldn't recommend fitting a 4.22 to it.

Why be that sir?
Logged
Still learning...Be nice!
Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 ... 12   Go Up
 

Page created in 0.026 seconds with 18 queries.