Print

Please login or register.
1 Hour 1 Day 1 Week 1 Month Forever
Login with username, password and session length

[Doctor Gollum]

The picture is purely a visual confirmation of a person inside the property not a proof of identity.

You get photographed or filmed every single place you go outside of the house, whether you want or agree to be or not

It might be argued that someone so paranoid, shouldn't be anywhere near the internet.

[TheBoy]

It might be argued that someone so paranoid, shouldn't be anywhere near the internet.

Fixed!

I bet all your neighbours Ring doorbells (illegally) record you as you walk out, then everybody's dashcams (illegally) record you as you walk/drive down the road. Then you are picked up (legally) on council CCTV or (legal) shop CCTV....

[Rangie]

As long as we get what we ordered I couldn't give a flying f**k if they take a photograph.

[Doctor Gollum]

It might be argued that someone so paranoid, shouldn't be anywhere near the internet.

Fixed!

I bet all your neighbours Ring doorbells (illegally) record you as you walk out, then everybody's dashcams (illegally) record you as you walk/drive down the road. Then you are picked up (legally) on council CCTV or (legal) shop CCTV....

We live on a private road, so it could reasonably be argued that any CCTV that films the road in front of the house (that we are legally responsible for) is legally recording

[STEMO]

It might be argued that someone so paranoid, shouldn't be anywhere near the internet.

Fixed!

I bet all your neighbours Ring doorbells (illegally) record you as you walk out, then everybody's dashcams (illegally) record you as you walk/drive down the road. Then you are picked up (legally) on council CCTV or (legal) shop CCTV....

We live on a private road, so it could reasonably be argued that any CCTV that films the road in front of the house (that we are legally responsible for) is legally recording

Only if your neighbours, any visitors/delivery drivers sign a GDPR form saying they agree 

[Doctor Gollum]

It might be argued that someone so paranoid, shouldn't be anywhere near the internet.

Fixed!

I bet all your neighbours Ring doorbells (illegally) record you as you walk out, then everybody's dashcams (illegally) record you as you walk/drive down the road. Then you are picked up (legally) on council CCTV or (legal) shop CCTV....

We live on a private road, so it could reasonably be argued that any CCTV that films the road in front of the house (that we are legally responsible for) is legally recording

Only if your neighbours, any visitors/delivery drivers sign a GDPR form saying they agree 

The road immediately infront of the house does not a whole street make

[STEMO]

It might be argued that someone so paranoid, shouldn't be anywhere near the internet.

Fixed!

I bet all your neighbours Ring doorbells (illegally) record you as you walk out, then everybody's dashcams (illegally) record you as you walk/drive down the road. Then you are picked up (legally) on council CCTV or (legal) shop CCTV....

We live on a private road, so it could reasonably be argued that any CCTV that films the road in front of the house (that we are legally responsible for) is legally recording

Only if your neighbours, any visitors/delivery drivers sign a GDPR form saying they agree 

The road immediately infront of the house does not a whole street make

Yes, but the folk I mentioned earlier have every right to enter that space, and not to be filmed doing so.
This is all moot, of course, because people use them anyway, and the first thing the police ask for after a crime has been committed is the illegal footage from Ring doorbells 

[Doctor Gollum]

As it goes, we don't have a camera, but many do.

[TheBoy]

It might be argued that someone so paranoid, shouldn't be anywhere near the internet.

Fixed!

I bet all your neighbours Ring doorbells (illegally) record you as you walk out, then everybody's dashcams (illegally) record you as you walk/drive down the road. Then you are picked up (legally) on council CCTV or (legal) shop CCTV....

We live on a private road, so it could reasonably be argued that any CCTV that films the road in front of the house (that we are legally responsible for) is legally recording

It's a grey area dependent in part in who owns the land.  Most private or unadopted roads belong to the landlord (for leaseholds) or the developer for currently unadopted roads.

[Doctor Gollum]

Deeds include responsibility up to the centre of the road Infront of the property. Technically the developer owns the common areas, but residents association have acquired tenancy of them by virtue of having maintained the estate for several decades.. early 60s development of a former sand quarry.

[TheBoy]

Deeds include responsibility up to the centre of the road Infront of the property. Technically the developer owns the common areas, but residents association have acquired tenancy of them by virtue of having maintained the estate for several decades.. early 60s development of a former sand quarry.

It'll be a combination of who legally owns the land (from land registry point of view) and if it can be expected for members of the public not visiting the landowner...    ....it's all a complete fuster cluck of a law.  But I'm sure you know this, being a model aircraft flyer

[Doctor Gollum]

That reminds me, I really must finish that

Technically it isn't a through road so the general public have no business using it. I say technically, because when the developer that built the estate to the north and east of us in the 70's they took out the boundary hedge to ease their access essentially linking a cul de sac to our road. That road is adopted, ours is not. Go figure.

[Mr Skrunts]

Thumbs up to Ebay  today.

On the the 23rd of Nov I bought an item for £23. I have had a few of these over the years but this was approx half price (2 in stock) so I bought one. A monday to friday for the next week was given for delivery. So the latest should have been 1st Dec.

As there was no delivery with in the time specified I emailed the seller friday night, with no responce by tuesday morning I emailed them again.  In the meantime I looked up the refund proceedure,

Gaining the info I needed there was a tick box indicating that If I need thier help then they could get involved from the 8th Dec.

Woke up this morning to an email stating they have procesed the refund allready

[TheBoy]

Thumbs up to Ebay  today.

On the the 23rd of Nov I bought an item for £23. I have had a few of these over the years but this was approx half price (2 in stock) so I bought one. A monday to friday for the next week was given for delivery. So the latest should have been 1st Dec.

As there was no delivery with in the time specified I emailed the seller friday night, with no responce by tuesday morning I emailed them again.  In the meantime I looked up the refund proceedure,

Gaining the info I needed there was a tick box indicating that If I need thier help then they could get involved from the 8th Dec.

Woke up this morning to an email stating they have procesed the refund allready

That will have been the seller.  Ebay aren't allowed to until the seller doesnt respond for several days.

[Mr Skrunts]

Looking at the sellers feed back (Should have looked at that 1st) I doubt it was them, Ebay did say they would get involved on the 8th, looks like thay did.  Either way I got the result I required.

Feedback ratings
Last 12 months
Positive
32- positive Feedback in last 12 months
Neutral
5- neutral Feedback in last 12 months
Negative
45