Omega Owners Forum
Chat Area => General Discussion Area => Topic started by: Sir Tigger KC on 11 November 2020, 20:08:41
-
The total death toll of people who have died for any reason, within 28 days of a positive Covid test has now gone over 50,000. ::)
Think about that statement for a moment and then wonder why the hell we are all swallowing this shite without question! :-X >:(
-
The total death toll of people who have died for any reason, within 28 days of a positive Covid test has now gone over 50,000. ::)
Think about that statement for a moment and then wonder why the hell we are all swallowing this shite without question! :-X >:(
You're not swallowing it without question.
-
The total death toll of people who have died for any reason, within 28 days of a positive Covid test has now gone over 50,000. ::)
Think about that statement for a moment and then wonder why the hell we are all swallowing this shite without question! :-X >:(
You're not swallowing it without question.
No. It seems to me that most people do though. ::)
-
Suggesting otherwise is apparently conspiricist...
-
Don't forget to add the 30,000 excess deaths at home to that 50K ;)
then add on all the people who didn't get diagnosis or treatment in the last 8 months that will die
then double that number for the total before covid is possibly vaccinated against ,IF that works ;)
a great "thinning of the surplus population" :-X
-
Thinning of the surplus population? So far, in the whole of the world, there has been around 50 million cases, that's cases, not deaths. This year, so far the world population has grown by 70 million.
1.27 million deaths, 70 million additional people. Not much thinning there.
https://www.worldometers.info/coronavirus/?utm_campaign=homeAdvegas1?%22%20%5Cl%20%22countries
https://www.worldometers.info/world-population/
-
they've not released covid 20 yet ;)
-
they've not released covid 20 yet ;)
Or have they...
-
It went over 50,000 Months ago before they stopped counting Deaths that happened more than 28 Days after being Tested with in Virus, meaning if you Die on the 29th Day or over, your not an statistic.
-
Who's in charge of the counting Diane Abbot ?
-
Don't forget to add the 30,000 excess deaths at home to that 50K ;)
then add on all the people who didn't get diagnosis or treatment in the last 8 months that will die
then double that number for the total before covid is possibly vaccinated against ,IF that works ;)
a great "thinning of the surplus population" :-X
Then add the Flu deaths which are now included in the death toll :-X
-
Don't forget to add the 30,000 excess deaths at home to that 50K ;)
then add on all the people who didn't get diagnosis or treatment in the last 8 months that will die
then double that number for the total before covid is possibly vaccinated against ,IF that works ;)
a great "thinning of the surplus population" :-X
Then add the Flu deaths which are now included in the death toll :-X
That tells you everything you need to know...
It's unusual behaviour for a Conservative government, but it does seem to be a global approach, which is disconcerting as there's only one reason to make the numbers worse...
-
Ive ignored their figures in this all along, and used my own from the office of National Statistics.
They helpfully publish deaths this year every week, week by week, compared the average of that week over the last 5 years. Gives a decent insight into the real situation
https://www.ons.gov.uk/peoplepopulationandcommunity/birthsdeathsandmarriages/deaths/datasets/weeklyprovisionalfiguresondeathsregisteredinenglandandwales
In this spreadsheet just look at the weekly figures tab, rows 9 & 10
https://www.ons.gov.uk/file?uri=%2fpeoplepopulationandcommunity%2fbirthsdeathsandmarriages%2fdeaths%2fdatasets%2fweeklyprovisionalfiguresondeathsregisteredinenglandandwales%2f2020/publishedweek442020.xlsx
You can see how it ramped up from average figures to over double the weekly deaths at its maximum, then reducing once noone was going out, and now ramping up again
There is also some Covid data in there but I ignore it in favour of the above, as they are absolute figures, not depending if someone thought covid was somehow involved.
-
They also state that the figures for weeks 11-18 are lower* than the 5 year trend but for weeks 19-28 slightly higher* and go onto say that this isn't significant enough to indicate a trend as there is some variation year to year.
* these may be the other around but you get the point.