Omega Owners Forum

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  

News:

Please play nicely.  No one wants to listen/read a keyboard warriors rants....

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.

Messages - D

Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 76
1
General Discussion Area / If you have an hour or so free...
« on: 15 February 2016, 01:50:40 »
...do try and watch this video. It is a year old and a half decent production of what is going on within the NHS/NHS England. It starts off in an odd fashion but then the quality picks up.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ultKvnw2h3Q

Then make up your own minds.

Edited to add: I am not a BMA member, never have and never will be. I also have nothing to do with the video itself, but know one or two of the people in the video as I have worked with them.

2
General Discussion Area / Re: doctors contracts
« on: 13 February 2016, 16:41:47 »
There's a table here to show things as simply as possible

We will fight contract imposition, says BMA
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-35548091

I was looking at that table earlier and found it misleading,  the synic in me thinks there may be a small amount of deliberate obfuscation of the truth in it.

table on the left presents % as a whole, the other 2 represent amount + x%.  eg 120% of basic vs basic + 30%, the second one is actually higher but looks smaller.  At least subconsciously anyhow.

This strike is about nothing but money, ok there is a little bit of politics here (oooo look at the nasty tories killing the NHS) but 95% about the money.  At every turn the BMA will make you think it is about patient safety but those arguments are simply BS and the arguements don't stand up to scruteny. 

BMA: "These plans will affect patient safety"
Interviewer: "Can you explain how? "
BMA: "No, but trust me, I'm a doctor"
 :-\

We were working long hours in Afghan at the hospital, minimum 8 but upto 14 hours a day 7 days a week.  People were working long shifts and dealing with some pretty horrific and busy work patterns, without a pay rise.  They looked at patient outcomes and Bastion Role 3 hospital was rated the best in the world for trauma.  Why?  Because the specialists and the management (leadership) weren't afraid to make some pretty ballsy decisions and changes to the fundemental doctrine we had not changed in decades.  Changes such as taking the front door of A&E to the scene of the incident, including damage control surgery in the back of a chinook (which when I saw it in action just blew me away)

If something didn't work we changed it.

Nobody cried.  Some still sadly died.

We learned, we adapted and we worked hard.  The men and women I had the honour of working alongside did some amazing things and saved many lives.

I think it is sad that what is mostly just a financial isue is being hidden by this "Patient Safety" arguement.  It has already been proven that if you have a stroke at the weekend you are more likely to die than if you have one during the week.  Where is the patient safety arguement here?  Why is nobody on the front line or the BMA suggesting or making fundemental changes to how they work in order to change that?

That is a completely wrong, biased and moronic appraisal of a very complicated and important issue. I will say no more because you cannot have a discussion with someone as mis-informed as you who likes to make blanket statements about someone/something else without understanding anything about it. Of course when it comes to something like cycling, you will spend hours spouting crap and writing up proposals to protect your backside. When it comes to your job or your health; again you spend time bleating about it and making it sound like it is the most important thing in the world. However when it comes to the issue of doctors, you always seem to have some sort of hidden agenda of making it look like they are always wrong.

I will leave you with this question. Show me one study that actually shows increased stroke mortality on a weekend is related to the care (or more specifically to the number of doctors) they receive on a weekend rather than other factors including nurses/physio/OT/speech and language therapists/imagers/interventionalists/drug availability/patient transport etc:

https://fullfact.org/health/ask-full-fact-stroke-patients-and-weekend-deaths/

Additionally in response to patient outcomes from Bastion Role 3; there was and still is a lack of information of physiological severity scoring of patients treated and admitted to the unit. And how does comparing outcomes from such a unit apply to a normal NHS hospital. Chinooks which are fully adapted vs tiny air ambulances in the NHS? Level 3 care vs smaller hospitals in the UK, some of whom do not even have level 3 beds? 34% of patients were transferred out to other units. Imagine that in the NHS. 18% were evacuated by a critical care aeromedical evacuation team. None of this happens in the NHS. Why? Because of the level of investment in the above hospital vs what a normal NHS hospital receives.

The average ITU stay in Camp Bastion was 2.5 days. Completely incomparable to a normal NHS hospital ITU stay.

So Jeremy Hunt's explanation of thinning out an already stretched workforce even thinner does not work. What you need is more doctors/nurses/HCA/physios/OT/SALT/images/porters/ phlebotomists to bolster the weekends. Not stretch the workforce and in the process make the weekday less safe.

I am not a junior doctor, but I see the degree of altruism in my junior doctors. Most, if not all of them give up their free time for the patients that they really care about. And you cheapen and insult that dedication by calling it "about the money". Shame on you!

3
General Discussion Area / Tax question
« on: 02 January 2016, 15:11:29 »
Friend of mine asked me today and I have no idea. She/husband are long term UK residents but not citizens as such. She/her husband are in the process of buying a house in the UK and her parents have agreed to help with part of the deposit. Said parents are non UK citizens and live outside the UK. I understand that the amount that the parents are helping with is between 20-40k. A long term loan from parents with no interest and payments as and when possible.

So question is: Is this amount taxable if sent as a gift to the above couple? I wouldn't have thought so as it has been earned by a foreign citizen in a foreign country. Any ideas or websites I could direct him to?

4
General Discussion Area / Re: Virus from hell
« on: 23 December 2015, 00:44:55 »
Sounds horrible. What was the actual diagnosis? Something doesnt add up and the eyes and muscle weakness are very odd. Have you had tests for the reason behind the weakness? Depending on your age and risk factors you may need further tests, preferably with a physician.

5
General Car Chat / Re: Omega tyres: what's the cheapest?
« on: 25 November 2015, 20:52:34 »
Speaking of tyres, the 2.2 needs a set of boots soon. I really like the Kumho KU31's on there now, but I know some here are not keen  ::)

Found some online, £59 a corner delivered.

Anyone had experience of these people?

http://www.oponeo.co.uk

They are fine. Slow to ship, but otherwise ok.

6
General Car Chat / Re: Popped in Vx Dealer on the way home...
« on: 16 November 2015, 20:54:48 »
Popped back again today to pick up some cam cover o-rings, for when the lifters are changed.

Overheard another service bill.....

1 x oil filter
5L of semi-synth oil
1 x oil filter gasket
1 x fuel filter

1.5 Hours labour charge for the above.

1 x batetery for key fob

Total: £283  :o

Really puts me off new cars, That would be what on the 3.2 if I did it all myself. £25?   ;D

£8 oil, £4 filter. Not sure what fuel filers are these days on TC.

You are not comparing like for like are you? You are comparing dealer rates with TC prices and free labour(ie you). Start paying non TC prices for oil etc and the difference will reduce. Then work out what your time costs are and the gap decreases. Then make an attempt to shop around and find a dealership that offers reasonable service packages and the difference then becomes negligible.

My local dealership did a basic oil/filter change with a general check over for £69 all inclusive, which was very reasonable.

Still at least 3 times what I would have paid. :y

Depends on what you value your time at. If your time spent = £0, then maybe you are correct.

Not so in my case. So £69 was a bargain for me!

7
General Car Chat / Re: Popped in Vx Dealer on the way home...
« on: 13 November 2015, 23:43:52 »
Popped back again today to pick up some cam cover o-rings, for when the lifters are changed.

Overheard another service bill.....

1 x oil filter
5L of semi-synth oil
1 x oil filter gasket
1 x fuel filter

1.5 Hours labour charge for the above.

1 x batetery for key fob

Total: £283  :o

Really puts me off new cars, That would be what on the 3.2 if I did it all myself. £25?   ;D

£8 oil, £4 filter. Not sure what fuel filers are these days on TC.

You are not comparing like for like are you? You are comparing dealer rates with TC prices and free labour(ie you). Start paying non TC prices for oil etc and the difference will reduce. Then work out what your time costs are and the gap decreases. Then make an attempt to shop around and find a dealership that offers reasonable service packages and the difference then becomes negligible.

My local dealership did a basic oil/filter change with a general check over for £69 all inclusive, which was very reasonable.

8
Now sold. Please lock.

9
...
If only patients were reasonable and listened then your point would be very valid. Unfortunately they don't.

So doctors have to write a prescription? What total carp!

As a nation we pander far too much to the stupid. Creating super bugs by handing out antibiotics like smarties, giving 2nd liver transplants to alcoholics who destroyed the first one (George best) instead of someone who might actually look after it. Operating on lung cancer patients who don't stop smoking (my mother in law).

We have enough on as a nation paying for the NHS without pandering to those that won't meet them half way.  >:(

And don't get me started on homeopathy, Reikhi healers and all the other snake oil the nhs splashes our tax cash on  :(

Just think, if we cut out all the sh!t, maybe we could pay our junior doctors half as much as our tube drivers  ::)

Oh, I dont disagree at all.

Except if I were to even think of voicing an opinion like that, I would have a flood of complaint letters on my desk the very next day. From the very same smoking homeopaths that wont stop drinking.

10
Just capitalising on the fact that, when you have much more grave things on your mind, you'll just pay it. :(

I think that is an unfair assumption in most cases.

Yes, you're probably correct, on reflection. My comment probably is more relevant to the cost of parking than the fact that there is a charge for it, which is not unreasonable in itself. I don't see how it need cost any more to run a hospital car park than any other, yet the charges are typically much higher.

It also means that residents in nearby areas get their roads littered with cars which should be in the hospital car park.

Depends really. For eg: St Thomas's in Westminster charge £3 per hour, whilst the nearby private ones charge around £7ph. As a result the car park is always full. It is a pain for staff as the parking is shared. Staff pay around £350 per year to park.

But a relatively isolated hospital with no close by town centre/shopping areas should charge the minimum possible.

Most trusts will cancel charges or fines levied if you are visiting an ill relative. Obviously if you take the p*** and park in a disabled spot, then you deserve the fine.

11
Just capitalising on the fact that, when you have much more grave things on your mind, you'll just pay it. :(

Now where would you like your local hospital to find money to do maintenance from?

Possibly from the £5m or so the NHS has spent on art since 2010, or by closing the three NHS Homoeopathic Hospitals we have in the uk, or by not prescribing expensive antibiotics to idiots with viral infections just because they ask for them?

Perhaps if the NHS just stuck to meeting a clinical need, with treatments that we know to work, there would be a bit more money in the system for things patients actually need?  :y

If only patients were reasonable and listened then your point would be very valid. Unfortunately they don't.

12
"D", you make a good case for parking charges, but I have several issues with what you say.
"Varche" hit it right when he said "OUR" hospital; yesm WE own them, including the car parks, so why should we pay for using what we own? I feel that this should apply to all Municipal car parks - they should be a facility provided free at the point of consumption, as with other services.
Funding is always going to be an issue, especially when all governments try to conceal true costs in stealth taxes; we as motorists know all about those!
Speaking of which, we motorists contribute c.£50,000 Million to the exchequer in taxes and receive approx. 10% of those monies back in facilities (look at the state of the roads), the balance being hived off to fund the NHS, education and pointless wars overseas.

Ron.

Your sense of entitlement is what is wrong with the system today. I had someone tell me that they deserve to be treated "extra special" due to the amount of NI they pay. I suspect if you were to look at the costs of an ITU bed per day, most people wouldnt have paid anywhere near the cost of a routine ITU stay.

By the way, the biggest expense for the treasury is social care, then the NHS. Defence spending is actually tiny compared to social care. Of the top of my head, 18 billion on social care in 2013/14.

Having worked in a developing country NHS, the US and here. I can safely say that I prefer the NHS in the UK. You only realise what you have after it goes missing.

13
Just capitalising on the fact that, when you have much more grave things on your mind, you'll just pay it. :(

I think that is an unfair assumption in most cases.

To park, you need land, and a decent surface to park on. This surface requires maintenance. There is no money in any NHS budget for this sort of cost. If the car park was pot hole ridden or a swamp, then the same visitors would be complaining about that.

You also need some sort of enforcement on the land. If not you will get cars being dumped, illegal activities including prostitution (which I have seen myself regularly in a hospital car park in Yorkshire).

Our car park for eg: became water logged and had to have repairs done overnight/over a weekend. The cost of those repairs were eye watering. Would you prefer money from the cancer/children's/elderly budgets being diverted to repair the car park?

There is a significant, unrelenting and unrealistic drive to cut spending on healthcare budgets (not managerial, but actual healthcare) that comes from the govt. Then a drive to cut junior doctors pay and make them work longer hours.

Now where would you like your local hospital to find money to do maintenance from? And remember most trusts will cancel parking tickets/charges if you are visiting a very ill relative/a relative in ITU etc.

14




White bit is the remnant of tape that used to hold the front mud guard in place. front mud guards were removed due to the being old and tatty.


















Lacquer peel on rear spoiler


15
Where is the car located  :y

PM sent.

Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 76

Page created in 0.018 seconds with 19 queries.