Omega Owners Forum

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  

News:

Welcome to OOF

Pages: [1]   Go Down

Author Topic: farage v barroso  (Read 640 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Richie London

  • Omega Queen
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • heathrow
  • Posts: 10932
    • View Profile
farage v barroso
« on: 16 December 2010, 17:26:15 »

so who made you president mr baroso??  ;D ;D


[media]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7jHaLUZP4eQ[/media]
Logged

millwall

  • Omega Baron
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • se london
  • Posts: 3138
  • no muff too tuff
    • accord type s
    • View Profile
Re: farage v barroso
« Reply #1 on: 16 December 2010, 17:27:33 »

!!!FIGHT!!! :y
Logged

Richie London

  • Omega Queen
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • heathrow
  • Posts: 10932
    • View Profile
Re: farage v barroso
« Reply #2 on: 16 December 2010, 17:30:22 »

Quote
!!!FIGHT!!! :y


nigel farage is brilliant, blunt and to the point.  :y

this eux.tv is excellent viewing sometimes
Logged

millwall

  • Omega Baron
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • se london
  • Posts: 3138
  • no muff too tuff
    • accord type s
    • View Profile
Re: farage v barroso
« Reply #3 on: 16 December 2010, 17:33:07 »

Quote
Quote
!!!FIGHT!!! :y


nigel farage is brilliant, blunt and to the point.  :y

this eux.tv is excellent viewing sometimes
agreed richie :y
Logged

Nickbat

  • Guest
Re: farage v barroso
« Reply #4 on: 16 December 2010, 17:34:23 »

Quote
Quote
!!!FIGHT!!! :y


nigel farage is brilliant, blunt and to the point:y

this eux.tv is excellent viewing sometimes

Quite so, Richie.  :y

Not a characteristic shared by many MPs or MEPs, sadly. :(
Logged

Banjax

  • Omega Lord
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Perth
  • Posts: 5510
  • We're just a virus with shoes
    • View Profile
Re: farage v barroso
« Reply #5 on: 16 December 2010, 17:35:41 »

he is annoyingly funny i admit  ;D ;D :y
Logged
50 bucks!?! For 50 bucks I'd put my face in their soup and blow!!

Richie London

  • Omega Queen
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • heathrow
  • Posts: 10932
    • View Profile
Re: farage v barroso
« Reply #6 on: 16 December 2010, 17:36:44 »

Quote
Quote
Quote
!!!FIGHT!!! :y


nigel farage is brilliant, blunt and to the point:y

this eux.tv is excellent viewing sometimes

Quite so, Richie.  :y

Not a characteristic shared by many MPs or MEPs, sadly. :(


spineless lying cowards this govt is now.
Logged

V6 CDX-er

  • Intermediate Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Sheffield
  • Posts: 452
    • View Profile
Re: farage v barroso
« Reply #7 on: 17 December 2010, 02:05:14 »

Quote
Quote
Quote
Quote
!!!FIGHT!!! :y


nigel farage is brilliant, blunt and to the point:y

this eux.tv is excellent viewing sometimes

Quite so, Richie.  :y

Not a characteristic shared by many MPs or MEPs, sadly. :(


spineless lying cowards this govt is now.


Almost as bad as the last lot.

How any true conservative libertarian can vote for anyone else besides UKIP is beyond me. With that in mind it is interesting to note that in the last GE, if every UKIP vote had gone to the Conservatives, then there now wouldn't be the need for the Con-Lib alliance.
Logged

Banjax

  • Omega Lord
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Gender: Male
  • Perth
  • Posts: 5510
  • We're just a virus with shoes
    • View Profile
Re: farage v barroso
« Reply #8 on: 17 December 2010, 08:34:37 »

Quote
Quote
Quote
Quote
Quote
!!!FIGHT!!! :y


nigel farage is brilliant, blunt and to the point:y

this eux.tv is excellent viewing sometimes

Quite so, Richie.  :y

Not a characteristic shared by many MPs or MEPs, sadly. :(


spineless lying cowards this govt is now.


Almost as bad as the last lot.

How any true conservative libertarian can vote for anyone else besides UKIP is beyond me. With that in mind it is interesting to note that in the last GE, if every UKIP vote had gone to the Conservatives, then there now wouldn't be the need for the Con-Lib alliance.

not true, you'd have to discount all the UKIP votes made in constituencies where the Tories won....which is probably most of them to be honest, so there would actually be little difference in the outcome  :y
Logged
50 bucks!?! For 50 bucks I'd put my face in their soup and blow!!
Pages: [1]   Go Up
 

Page created in 0.033 seconds with 21 queries.