Omega Owners Forum
Chat Area => General Discussion Area => Topic started by: Darryl Flynn on 13 November 2006, 19:24:49
-
Hi,
i currently have a 99 2.5 V6 auto Estate but have been looking at a 2.2 petrol auto facelift which is in
good nick, locally.
Performance is not an issue but is the 2.2 4 pot much better if at all , on fuel than my current car.
Seeing as i do my own maintenance i would think it would be a load easier to work on seeing as it a simple in line four.
Cheers Darryl
-
The 2.2 isn't always anymore economical, as you tend to strain the engine a little more getting it up to speed. On long cruises, it is better by around 5mpg though. It is noticible less refined/smooth than v6 as expected...
-
I had a 98 2.0 estate before my V6. Fuel difference was not that great. Performance difference is huge ;)
-
For a big car 2.2 suits me fine although there are others on here that drive nicer and eek out excellent MPG. For a 4 pot I find it smooth and reliable and have no intentions of changing.
If it's advertised on the net, post some details and you'll get lots of opinions to help you decide.
Don't forget insurance will be cheaper on 2.2 than V6.
-
For a big car 2.2 suits me fine although there are others on here that drive nicer and eek out excellent MPG. For a 4 pot I find it smooth and reliable and have no intentions of changing.
If it's advertised on the net, post some details and you'll get lots of opinions to help you decide.
Don't forget insurance will be cheaper on 2.2 than V6.
Oppps, my previous post made it sound like I was criticising the 2.2, that wasn't my intention.
The 2.2 is still a good car, though for someone used to 2.5 v6, as original poster is, it will feel underpowered, and less smooth. Economy won't be much better around town...
-
No offence taken Jaime. I meant that Tunnie's 2.2 gets 40 MPG+ and don't get me started on his dad's tyres...... ;)
I pull a 850KG caravan on occassion and wish I had a 3.0 to ease the hills - but compared to the 306D I used to have it's fab.
-
I actually find my 2.2 quite powerfull...and im used to the best engine Opel every produced!! ;D Straight 6 CIH..now thats the Daddy!!
The only downside i find with my 2.2 is the standing start....0-60 aint great...but accelerating from say 40/50mph up to 120-ish mph is more than adequate... i agree its a bit 'soft' feeling but overall its powerfull enough!
If its pure performance your after then buy a Ferrari!! ;D
-
I actually find my 2.2 quite powerfull...and im used to the best engine Opel every produced!! ;D Straight 6 CIH..now thats the Daddy!!
The only downside i find with my 2.2 is the standing start....0-60 aint great...but accelerating from say 40/50mph up to 120-ish mph is more than adequate... i agree its a bit 'soft' feeling but overall its powerfull enough!
If its pure performance your after then buy a Ferrari!! ;D
The biggest issue with the 2.2 is not the engine, but the car - its rather heavy for the poor little engine to drag up to speed. Though, it is obviously ideal for some people for various reasons (eg insurance, economy, cost etc).
-
I actually find my 2.2 quite powerfull...and im used to the best engine Opel every produced!! ;D Straight 6 CIH..now thats the Daddy!!
The only downside i find with my 2.2 is the standing start....0-60 aint great...but accelerating from say 40/50mph up to 120-ish mph is more than adequate... i agree its a bit 'soft' feeling but overall its powerfull enough!
If its pure performance your after then buy a Ferrari!! ;D
The biggest issue with the 2.2 is not the engine, but the car - its rather heavy for the poor little engine to drag up to speed. Though, it is obviously ideal for some people for various reasons (eg insurance, economy, cost etc).
I've driven a 2.2 its quite smooth and not underpowered but as TB said u won't get much differencr in MPG and you will get quite a bit of differenct in power
-
The biggest issue with the 2.2 is not the engine, but the car - its rather heavy for the poor little engine to drag up to speed. Though, it is obviously ideal for some people for various reasons (eg insurance, economy, cost etc).
Mine's much faster now I've stripped out the unneccessary extra weight - wife, kids, car seats, pram, pushchair, handbag etc.... put them all in special Vx mod designed just for the job.. it's called a Meriva.
Against driving this a 2.2 feels soooooo much better [smiley=wink.gif]
-
i find the 2.2 quite quick in manual form, in auto it is a bit dull....
I had a 2.5 V6 Auto for a while, and have to say the enging was much smoother and made a nicer sound.
It just does things easier than the 2.2, however i did not find it noticably slower.
I drove the 2.5 Auto for about a week, driving it every day, and ragging it a bit as it was a project car and i was not intending on keeping it. When i jumped back into my 2.2 i thought... humm here we go its gunna be slow and i am gunna want a V6.
I was very suprised, the 2.2 still felt liveley and quick. Ever since i cleaned the breathers, and put a new exhaust one it really has made things better.
Make sure the breather pipes are clean, espcially that tiny little one on the drivers side, clean that and boy does it make a differnce!
-
I was very suprised, the 2.2 still felt liveley and quick. Ever since i cleaned the breathers, and put a new exhaust one it really has made things better.
It even wheelspins, and gets tail happy :-[
Oh no, hang on a minute, that was just the shit tyres... ;D
-
I was very suprised, the 2.2 still felt liveley and quick. Ever since i cleaned the breathers, and put a new exhaust one it really has made things better.
It even wheelspins, and gets tail happy :-[
Oh no, hang on a minute, that was just the shit tyres... ;D
Only joking Mark - there's nothing wrong with your 2.2, and its ideal for your current needs :y
-
No offence taken Jaime. I meant that Tunnie's 2.2 gets 40 MPG+ and don't get me started on his dad's tyres...... ;)
I pull a 850KG caravan on occassion and wish I had a 3.0 to ease the hills - but compared to the 306D I used to have it's fab.
V6 is MUCH better for towing and mine is cheaper to run than a 2.2
-
I was very suprised, the 2.2 still felt liveley and quick. Ever since i cleaned the breathers, and put a new exhaust one it really has made things better.
It even wheelspins, and gets tail happy :-[
Oh no, hang on a minute, that was just the shit tyres... ;D
Only joking Mark - there's nothing wrong with your 2.2, and its ideal for your current needs :y
sure is at the moment i am only using it about once a month! :-[
Do a big shopping do at tesco once a month, stock up on all that beer ;) then thats it, unless i go home then it gets used.
Took it to uni once, never again!!! parking is impossible and we are expected to pay £60 for the privilage to "hunt" for a space, a gaurenteed space costs £130!!!
So i bike in, much healthier, but can be deadly.
Must admit i would like a V6 next, the 2.2 does the job fine....
-
Oppps, my previous post made it sound like I was criticising the 2.2, that wasn't my intention.
...
You better not criticise a 2.2........... :o
-
Oppps, my previous post made it sound like I was criticising the 2.2, that wasn't my intention.
...
You better not criticise a 2.2........... :o
I can see I'm going to be the subject of your first ban :-[
-
Oppps, my previous post made it sound like I was criticising the 2.2, that wasn't my intention.
...
You better not criticise a 2.2........... :o
I can see I'm going to be the subject of your first ban :-[
Could always reduce your post count.... ::)
-
Could always reduce your post count.... ::)
:-[
-
Could always reduce your post count.... ::)
:-[
Good job power hasn't gone to my head......or I could repost the caravan pictures....;)
-
Could always reduce your post count.... ::)
:-[
Good job power hasn't gone to my head......or I could repost the caravan pictures....;)
:-[