Omega Owners Forum

Chat Area => General Car Chat => Topic started by: PAULCDX on 29 December 2013, 18:30:02

Title: Thoughts on the Insignia 2.0 CDTI SRI 130 or 160
Post by: PAULCDX on 29 December 2013, 18:30:02
SWMBO keeps looking online at the Insignia SRI CDTI as a possible replacement for her 2004 Vectra DTI in the near future.

Been looking at 10 / 11 reg's which you seem to be able to get now for around £7500 +  :o  :y

Are these good cars overall ? I do like the look of them to be honest.  :y

I've told her that under no circumstances are we getting rid of the miggy tho, even with the current auto box fault  :'(
Title: Re: Thoughts on the Insignia 2.0 CDTI SRI 130 or 160
Post by: biggriffin on 29 December 2013, 18:48:32
Show her a picture of a vxr8 estate. :y
Title: Re: Thoughts on the Insignia 2.0 CDTI SRI 130 or 160
Post by: kevinp58 on 29 December 2013, 19:05:30
Show her a picture of a vxr8 estate. :y










+1  :y
Title: Re: Thoughts on the Insignia 2.0 CDTI SRI 130 or 160
Post by: PAULCDX on 29 December 2013, 19:07:36
Not sure I've got the pennies for one of those though  ;D  :o

Nice thought all the same  :y  ;)
Title: Re: Thoughts on the Insignia 2.0 CDTI SRI 130 or 160
Post by: TheBoy on 29 December 2013, 19:08:45
Dull, boring drive, but surprisingly comfortable on long runs, and just does what it claims.

Title: Re: Thoughts on the Insignia 2.0 CDTI SRI 130 or 160
Post by: MR MISTER on 29 December 2013, 20:03:26
Not sure I've got the pennies for one of those though  ;D  :o

Nice thought all the same  :y  ;)
There's one on the trader for about £20,000  :y
Title: Re: Thoughts on the Insignia 2.0 CDTI SRI 130 or 160
Post by: Squealey on 29 December 2013, 21:34:35
Having previously worked for 3 years as a driver for Enterprise Rent A Car I have a load of mileage under my belt driving pretty much every variation of the Insignia and I must admit they are really nice drives. Personally the 160 is the one I'd choose, when new there was only a couple of hundred pounds difference in the price. The extra 30bhp is great to have when you need to overtake.

Front tyre wear is ferocious though, expect 10 to 12k a pair. The newer the better when it comes to build quality, the early 09 and 59 cars creaked from the centre console like crazy but this got a lot better later on. Reliability was never an issue on the ones we had with no recurring faults becoming apparent. Try to get a DAB stereo if you can, well worth it.  Do not under any circumstances be talked into a petrol one, the 1.8 is gutless and does 25mpg and the 1.4 turbo would struggle to break into the low 20's if driven with passion.

All in all though a really good car and for the money well worth it. The mondeo is a bit softer and quieter to drive and one car thats also overlooked is the Seat Exeo, old shape Audi A4, really smart car but really badly built.

Hope this is of some help

Wayne
Title: Re: Thoughts on the Insignia 2.0 CDTI SRI 130 or 160
Post by: Field Marshal Dr. Opti on 30 December 2013, 10:47:36
SWMBO keeps looking online at the Insignia SRI CDTI as a possible replacement for her 2004 Vectra DTI in the near future.

Been looking at 10 / 11 reg's which you seem to be able to get now for around £7500 +  :o  :y

Are these good cars overall ? I do like the look of them to be honest.  :y

I've told her that under no circumstances are we getting rid of the miggy tho, even with the current auto box fault  :'(


SHGTS. ;D
Title: Re: Thoughts on the Insignia 2.0 CDTI SRI 130 or 160
Post by: Auto Addict on 31 December 2013, 06:52:24
Having previously worked for 3 years as a driver for Enterprise Rent A Car I have a load of mileage under my belt driving pretty much every variation of the Insignia and I must admit they are really nice drives. Personally the 160 is the one I'd choose, when new there was only a couple of hundred pounds difference in the price. The extra 30bhp is great to have when you need to overtake.

Front tyre wear is ferocious though, expect 10 to 12k a pair. The newer the better when it comes to build quality, the early 09 and 59 cars creaked from the centre console like crazy but this got a lot better later on. Reliability was never an issue on the ones we had with no recurring faults becoming apparent. Try to get a DAB stereo if you can, well worth it.  Do not under any circumstances be talked into a petrol one, the 1.8 is gutless and does 25mpg and the 1.4 turbo would struggle to break into the low 20's if driven with passion.

All in all though a really good car and for the money well worth it. The mondeo is a bit softer and quieter to drive and one car thats also overlooked is the Seat Exeo, old shape Audi A4, really smart car but really badly built.

Hope this is of some help

Wayne

25K and still going strong :y
Title: Re: Thoughts on the Insignia 2.0 CDTI SRI 130 or 160
Post by: plym ian on 31 December 2013, 07:41:34
I hired a 130 and felt it was rather gutless, but saying that the fuel economy was outstanding :y

I did rather fancy one but can't afford it just yet :-\
Title: Re: Thoughts on the Insignia 2.0 CDTI SRI 130 or 160
Post by: the alarming man on 31 December 2013, 07:42:06
lets be fair though....rental car driven like you would drive your own I think not....I have had many rentals from enterprise and I have to say there maintenance program leaves a lot to be desired...and if I was in the market needing to rent a car I would not touch enterprise with a barge pole due to the way the cars are looked after...which is to be fair shocking especially as they now also do non fault accident rentals when in actual fact half of theirs should not be on the road...

In one week I had 3 cars all from enterprise first had 2 bald tyres that did not leave the branch :o ,second front pads were grinding after 200 miles and the third would not start from cold which was understandable as car had not been service in 50,000 miles all of which were car under a year old...absolute terrible company :-X
Title: Re: Thoughts on the Insignia 2.0 CDTI SRI 130 or 160
Post by: Proz on 04 January 2014, 21:27:56
Im not going to get into a slagging match here  :y.......
But after 12 years of Omega ownerships last year almost a year to the day i got my 2011 SRi 160 CDTI.
I will admit i was not to sure i had done the right thing in the first few hours/days but now i love it.
Fuel consumption is 45mpg at least and even seen 54mpg on a longish journey... so much better than the mid 20's if very lucky with the petrol Omega.
It is so much more faster in accelaration than my old Omega... I couldnt believe how slow and gutless / sluggish the Omega had been.
I will say that i do sometimes find the SRi suspension a bit hard on our dreadfull roads but maybe thats because the old Omega used to wallow all over the place when not tramlining  ;)
It doesnt have heated seats though which i do miss :(

In short i wouldnt even consider another Omega even if given one free... its not that i dont like them....I loved the 2 Omega's i had but newer more moderen cars are so much better looking inside and out ...3 year warranty and not the constant worry of things going wrong.. If anything happens a phone call is all it takes.... or the upcoming MOT praying it would pass etc.
I'll never had an "old" car again.

Just my point of view mind ... having experienced both cars.
Other points of view are available  ;D ;D
Title: Re: Thoughts on the Insignia 2.0 CDTI SRI 130 or 160
Post by: chrisgixer on 05 January 2014, 01:15:18
Im not going to get into a slagging match here  :y.......
But after 12 years of Omega ownerships last year almost a year to the day i got my 2011 SRi 160 CDTI.
I will admit i was not to sure i had done the right thing in the first few hours/days but now i love it.
Fuel consumption is 45mpg at least and even seen 54mpg on a longish journey... so much better than the mid 20's if very lucky with the petrol Omega.
It is so much more faster in accelaration than my old Omega... I couldnt believe how slow and gutless / sluggish the Omega had been.
I will say that i do sometimes find the SRi suspension a bit hard on our dreadfull roads but maybe thats because the old Omega used to wallow all over the place when not tramlining  ;)
It doesnt have heated seats though which i do miss :(

In short i wouldnt even consider another Omega even if given one free... its not that i dont like them....I loved the 2 Omega's i had but newer more moderen cars are so much better looking inside and out ...3 year warranty and not the constant worry of things going wrong.. If anything happens a phone call is all it takes.... or the upcoming MOT praying it would pass etc.
I'll never had an "old" car again.

Just my point of view mind ... having experienced both cars.
Other points of view are available  ;D ;D
I thought your omega was a 4pot though Proz?

Front wheel drive suspension is firmer than omega though, but I do like the insignia interior. Very nice.

I'll keep comments on the exterior appearance to myself though. :(
Title: Re: Thoughts on the Insignia 2.0 CDTI SRI 130 or 160
Post by: Field Marshal Dr. Opti on 05 January 2014, 10:36:37
Im not going to get into a slagging match here  :y.......
But after 12 years of Omega ownerships last year almost a year to the day i got my 2011 SRi 160 CDTI.
I will admit i was not to sure i had done the right thing in the first few hours/days but now i love it.
Fuel consumption is 45mpg at least and even seen 54mpg on a longish journey... so much better than the mid 20's if very lucky with the petrol Omega.
It is so much more faster in accelaration than my old Omega... I couldnt believe how slow and gutless / sluggish the Omega had been.
I will say that i do sometimes find the SRi suspension a bit hard on our dreadfull roads but maybe thats because the old Omega used to wallow all over the place when not tramlining  ;)
It doesnt have heated seats though which i do miss :(

In short i wouldnt even consider another Omega even if given one free... its not that i dont like them....I loved the 2 Omega's i had but newer more moderen cars are so much better looking inside and out ...3 year warranty and not the constant worry of things going wrong.. If anything happens a phone call is all it takes.... or the upcoming MOT praying it would pass etc.
I'll never had an "old" car again.

Just my point of view mind ... having experienced both cars.
Other points of view are available  ;D ;D
I thought your omega was a 4pot though Proz?

Front wheel drive suspension is firmer than omega though, but I do like the insignia interior. Very nice.

I'll keep comments on the exterior appearance to myself though. :(

He shudders..... ;D ;D ;)
Title: Re: Thoughts on the Insignia 2.0 CDTI SRI 130 or 160
Post by: pscocoa on 05 January 2014, 10:53:05
The 160 has to be the way forward. No complaints with our Insignia Elite Tourer Auto but noticed my wife is front wheel spinning on wet surfaces so will do a thorough check of tyres later today.

Went down to Portsmouth to pick up a couple of radiators yesterday which I thought were 1600 mm in length but were in fact 1800mm. They fitted in back without having to take front passenger seat out of use - much larger car than I thought it was fortunately
Title: Re: Thoughts on the Insignia 2.0 CDTI SRI 130 or 160
Post by: Auto Addict on 05 January 2014, 11:01:52
Owned mine for just over 12 months now, no regrets, still loving it.

What's a matter with the shape?
Title: Re: Thoughts on the Insignia 2.0 CDTI SRI 130 or 160
Post by: ted_one on 05 January 2014, 11:20:00
On a personal basis I don't give to much thought about other cars,I'm totally in love with my Omegas and will carry on taking care of and driving them until they take my licence away, of course other peoples needs and opinions will obviously differ,although having said that there is still an empty spot on my drive for something with a VXR badge on it,but the Omegas are staying :y