Omega Owners Forum

Chat Area => General Discussion Area => Topic started by: Rods2 on 27 June 2014, 17:05:22

Title: When the undercarriage fails when landing a Harrier...
Post by: Rods2 on 27 June 2014, 17:05:22
what do you do? Get a stool out. ??? ??? ???

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2672284/The-nerve-wracking-moment-fighter-pilot-sets-STOOL-aboard-Navy-ship-jets-landing-gear-failed.html (http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2672284/The-nerve-wracking-moment-fighter-pilot-sets-STOOL-aboard-Navy-ship-jets-landing-gear-failed.html)
Title: Re: When the undercarriage fails when landing a Harrier...
Post by: hercules on 27 June 2014, 17:51:24
if that had been a Yorkshire pilot he could of landed it on some wickets  ;)
Title: Re: When the undercarriage fails when landing a Harrier...
Post by: ffcgary1 on 27 June 2014, 18:20:55
funny thing about this is, that stool is not a stool but a nose rig built to do the job, and how the most powerful air force in the world is still using a jet that the british designed and built, then scrapped 5 years ago saying it was too old to be a viable fighter.
Well then Camaron, i think the term should be EPIC FAIL. ::)

Still....... we still dont have a carrier to put them or anything on at the moment. :-[
Title: Re: When the undercarriage fails when landing a Harrier...
Post by: Lizzie_Zoom on 27 June 2014, 20:19:41
funny thing about this is, that stool is not a stool but a nose rig built to do the job, and how the most powerful air force in the world is still using a jet that the british designed and built, then scrapped 5 years ago saying it was too old to be a viable fighter.
Well then Camaron, i think the term should be EPIC FAIL. ::)

Still....... we still dont have a carrier to put them or anything on at the moment. :-[

We do; HMS Illustrious.  Chiefly now a helicopter carrier, but  I feel sure could be used to land a Harrier or two.  Fuelling and servicing could perhaps be a problem (???) but I am sure in an emergency it could be done.

Still we will have at least one, if not two, super carriers in the not too distant future, if that is now a militarily sensible option and they haven't become as vulnerable as the battleship.
Title: Re: When the undercarriage fails when landing a Harrier...
Post by: kevinp58 on 27 June 2014, 20:42:50
Glad to see the Americans are still using the amazing and very successful Harrier  :y :y it was a huge mistake that the British government decided to get rid of a plane that still has huge benefits in modern warfare.  ::)
Title: Re: When the undercarriage fails when landing a Harrier...
Post by: tigers_gonads on 27 June 2014, 22:54:44
funny thing about this is, that stool is not a stool but a nose rig built to do the job, and how the most powerful air force in the world is still using a jet that the british designed and built, then scrapped 5 years ago saying it was too old to be a viable fighter.
Well then Camaron, i think the term should be EPIC FAIL. ::)

Still....... we still dont have a carrier to put them or anything on at the moment. :-[

We do; HMS Illustrious.  Chiefly now a helicopter carrier, but  I feel sure could be used to land a Harrier or two.  Fuelling and servicing could perhaps be a problem (???) but I am sure in an emergency it could be done.

Still we will have at least one, if not two, super carriers in the not too distant future, if that is now a militarily sensible option and they haven't become as vulnerable as the battleship.


Used in conjunction with the type 45 which is as good as you can get  ;)
Title: Re: When the undercarriage fails when landing a Harrier...
Post by: tigers_gonads on 27 June 2014, 23:01:26
Glad to see the Americans are still using the amazing and very successful Harrier  :y :y it was a huge mistake that the British government decided to get rid of a plane that still has huge benefits in modern warfare.  ::)



We could only afford to keep either the Tornado Gr4's or the Harriers  :(
Tornado could carry the Stormshadow missile and Brimstone.
Typhoon wasn't cleared to carry either and we couldn't afford to push through the package that would let them.

The Harrier could only carry Brimstone so we sold the Harriers to the yanks as spares  >:(

Sadly, the MOD is (and has been since the wall came down) run by accountants  >:(
Title: Re: When the undercarriage fails when landing a Harrier...
Post by: kevinp58 on 28 June 2014, 19:39:33
Glad to see the Americans are still using the amazing and very successful Harrier  :y :y it was a huge mistake that the British government decided to get rid of a plane that still has huge benefits in modern warfare.  ::)



We could only afford to keep either the Tornado Gr4's or the Harriers  :(
Tornado could carry the Stormshadow missile and Brimstone.
Typhoon wasn't cleared to carry either and we couldn't afford to push through the package that would let them.

The Harrier could only carry Brimstone so we sold the Harriers to the yanks as spares  >:(

Sadly, the MOD is (and has been since the wall came down) run by accountants  >:(







 we could afford both if we didn't give all that money to the Eurocrats and the Eurozone  >:( >:(