Omega Owners Forum
Chat Area => General Discussion Area => Topic started by: 4x4 on 29 June 2014, 20:46:21
-
While i was at a customers during the week,see if you can spot the mistake ;D
(http://i700.photobucket.com/albums/ww7/martinthrapston/DSC_0065_zpsyypub4na.jpg)
-
Why do you need to bother ordering if you've, well, bought your own food? Or is that just for drinks... ;D
-
While i was at a customers during the week,see if you can spot the mistake ;D
(http://i700.photobucket.com/albums/ww7/martinthrapston/DSC_0065_zpsyypub4na.jpg)
Well not we'll?
-
Who's garden? That's good service ;D
-
Possibly a missing apostrophe on the 'its number' since the its could be possessive.
What's the prize by the way-do I win the internet? :)
-
Missing apostrophe on 'well'...should be we'll :y
-
Missing apostrophe on 'well'...should be we'll :y
Obviously :y ;D ;D ;D ;D
-
I found that at a pub in loughton,milton keynes,none of the staff had noticed ....
-
It is surprising how many spelling mistakes you see when menus are hand written on a blackboard, can be quite amusing. ;) ;D ;D ;D ;D
-
It's piss poor on several levels. The printers obviously didn't notice either pre or post print, nor did anybody at Harvester..... ::)
Or maybe they all did and thought " It doughn ma' aah... " >:(
-
Possibly a missing apostrophe on the 'its number' since the its could be possessive.
What's the prize by the way-do I win the internet? :)
Apostrophes on "it's" are always an abbreviation of "it is", and are wrong for possessive cases. It should have been "we'll" rather than "well".
-
Possibly a missing apostrophe on the 'its number' since the its could be possessive.
What's the prize by the way-do I win the internet? :)
Apostrophes on "it's" are always an abbreviation of "it is", and are wrong for possessive cases. It should have been "we'll" rather than "well".
I agree. I was taught that it's considered possessive if it belongs to something or someone, not a word!
My sister in law-a teacher-argues this with me, which is why I said possibly.
She also disputed the existence of an Oxford comma, completely unaware of it until I told her what it was.
-
Possibly a missing apostrophe on the 'its number' since the its could be possessive.
What's the prize by the way-do I win the internet? :)
Apostrophes on "it's" are always an abbreviation of "it is", and are wrong for possessive cases. It should have been "we'll" rather than "well".
I agree. I was taught that it's considered possessive if it belongs to something or someone, not a word!
My sister in law-a teacher-argues this with me, which is why I said possibly.
She also disputed the existence of an Oxford comma, completely unaware of it until I told her what it was.
Something I used to use until recently
Language rules do change, they were trying to do away with apostrophe if I remember correctly but spelling mistakes are unforgiveable especially today with spell checker ETC.
The funniest bit of graffiti I saw was on a green Telecom Box in big black letters ... FUK OF. I blame education :y ;D ;D ;D ;D
-
Harvester are exactly the kind of establishment who probably have a corporate policy not to use the apostrophe at all in their communications because
it's it is "misunderstood". ::)
As such, their use of English is about as rich and wholesome as the sad, limp contents of their salad bars and other provisions "fresh" from the back of a 3663 lorry. ;D
-
Harvester are exactly the kind of establishment who probably have a corporate policy not to use the apostrophe at all in their communications because it's it is "misunderstood". ::)
As such, their use of English is about as rich and wholesome as the sad, limp contents of their salad bars and other provisions "fresh" from the back of a 3663 lorry. ;D
Hardly surprising when the suppliers use numbers instead of letters for their company name/logo ::)
3663 being FOOD on the telephone keypad ;D
-
Harvester are exactly the kind of establishment who probably have a corporate policy not to use the apostrophe at all in their communications because it's it is "misunderstood". ::)
As such, their use of English is about as rich and wholesome as the sad, limp contents of their salad bars and other provisions "fresh" from the back of a 3663 lorry. ;D
Hardly surprising when the suppliers use numbers instead of letters for their company name/logo ::)
3663 being FOOD on the telephone keypad ;D
The staff couldn't spell BOOKERS ;D ;D ;D
-
About as well produced as their microwave food and their standard's of service IME. ???