Omega Owners Forum
Chat Area => General Car Chat => Topic started by: Rods2 on 19 June 2015, 10:58:34
-
An impressive 3.24 seconds quicker than their old car so far, but they expect a bit more when they go for the official record soon. :) :) :)
http://www.gizmag.com/koenigsegg-one-1-0-300-0-kmh-record/38078/ (http://www.gizmag.com/koenigsegg-one-1-0-300-0-kmh-record/38078/)
Lord Opti needs to visit his dovecot and place an order sooner rather than later if he doesn't want to be at the back of the queue. The 0-300 km/h in 11.922 seconds performance he should find adequate and it will save on the cost of a remap for the fugly asthmatic wheeze box. :y :y :y
-
That is far swifter than the Veyron Supersport.
I'll take two. :y
-
Never beat my corsa cdti ::) :D :D
-
Never beat my corsa cdti ::) :D :D
You'll need a remap to beat the Koooneennnssssigggseeeggg, Sir Tig. ;D
-
If only there were a point to it all. It's hardly performance that you can use on the road, and, on a track, it'll be hampered by its' lardy 1400kg weight. You'd be much better off with something a third of the weight, with a modest engine, that doesn't cost Greece's defecit whenever you make contact with something. ::)
.. not that cost, or any kind of reasoning, comes into it, of course.
-
If only there were a point to it all. It's hardly performance that you can use on the road, and, on a track, it'll be hampered by its' lardy 1400kg weight. You'd be much better off with something a third of the weight, with a modest engine, that doesn't cost Greece's defecit whenever you make contact with something. ::)
.. not that cost, or any kind of reasoning, comes into it, of course.
..............something like a Westfield perhaps.... ::) ::) ::) ;)
-
If only there were a point to it all. It's hardly performance that you can use on the road, and, on a track, it'll be hampered by its' lardy 1400kg weight. You'd be much better off with something a third of the weight, with a modest engine, that doesn't cost Greece's defecit whenever you make contact with something. ::)
.. not that cost, or any kind of reasoning, comes into it, of course.
..............something like a Westfield perhaps.... ::) ::) ::) ;)
Well, naturally. :-[
Although, with that budget, you could do better, of course.
-
Bloody thing tram lines all over the place. ::)
:D ;D
Enjoyable post though. Thank you. :y
-
Now imagine if it was in black :o :o :o
;D ;D ;D
-
Yeah, be twice as fast ;) ;D
-
If only there were a point to it all. It's hardly performance that you can use on the road, and, on a track, it'll be hampered by its' lardy 1400kg weight. You'd be much better off with something a third of the weight, with a modest engine, that doesn't cost Greece's defecit whenever you make contact with something. ::)
.. not that cost, or any kind of reasoning, comes into it, of course.
Which would be the bigger pussy magnet in Sloane Square? ::) ::) ::)
I'm sure our worldly learned Lord can answer that, which is why he wants two. :) :) :)
-
An impressive 3.24 seconds quicker than their old car so far, but they expect a bit more when they go for the official record soon. :) :) :)
http://www.gizmag.com/koenigsegg-one-1-0-300-0-kmh-record/38078/ (http://www.gizmag.com/koenigsegg-one-1-0-300-0-kmh-record/38078/)
Lord Opti needs to visit his dovecot and place an order sooner rather than later if he doesn't want to be at the back of the queue. The 0-300 km/h in 11.922 seconds performance he should find adequate and it will save on the cost of a remap for the fugly asthmatic wheeze box. :y :y :y
What's most impressive, the time taken to get to 300kmh or the time taken to get back to zero ?