Omega Owners Forum

Chat Area => General Discussion Area => Topic started by: BazaJT on 28 November 2015, 20:26:12

Title: 4K
Post by: BazaJT on 28 November 2015, 20:26:12
I see a lot of adverts for tellys that state they're 4K or 4K ready.What is this 4K? What does it do?Why would I need it?
Title: Re: 4K
Post by: Andy B on 28 November 2015, 20:32:44
it's super duper HD telly
Title: Re: 4K
Post by: STEMO on 28 November 2015, 20:34:57
it's super duper HD telly
That's not really being broadcast by anybody yet.
Title: Re: 4K
Post by: tunnie on 28 November 2015, 21:14:16
it's super duper HD telly
That's not really being broadcast by anybody yet.

Apart from BT, Amazon Prime, Netflix, YouTube   ;)

It's also called Ultra HD which is how BT brand it. But basically it's 4 times better than standard full HD which could be considered 1k  :y
Title: Re: 4K
Post by: Andy B on 28 November 2015, 21:18:16
it's super duper HD telly
That's not really being broadcast by anybody yet.

Apart from BT, Amazon Prime, Netflix, YouTube   ;)

It's also called Ultra HD which is how BT brand it. But basically it's 4 times better than standard full HD which could be considered 1k  :y

so  ....... is that better than 405 lines?  ::)  ::) ::)
Title: Re: 4K
Post by: tunnie on 28 November 2015, 21:19:58
it's super duper HD telly
That's not really being broadcast by anybody yet.

Apart from BT, Amazon Prime, Netflix, YouTube   ;)

It's also called Ultra HD which is how BT brand it. But basically it's 4 times better than standard full HD which could be considered 1k  :y

so  ....... is that better than 405 lines?  ::)  ::) ::)

Could be  ;D

Thing is you need a big ass TV to get 4K benefit. Needs to be at least a 50" I'd say
Title: Re: 4K
Post by: RobG on 28 November 2015, 21:39:34
I`ve got a full HD 55" Samsung and when shown a 4k model, couldn`t really see what all the hype is about
Title: Re: 4K
Post by: Kevin Wood on 28 November 2015, 21:47:03
I`ve got a full HD 55" Samsung and when shown a 4k model, couldn`t really see what all the hype is about

Even on a 55" set, you've got to have your nose touching the screen to notice it. It's the next marketing gimmick, now that 3D and "smart" TVs have tanked. ;)
Title: Re: 4K
Post by: TheBoy on 28 November 2015, 22:59:16
full HD which could be considered 1k  :y
tut tut, YOU should know better.

Full HD is 1080p. Or roughly 1920 x 1080 pixels.

4k/UHD/Whatever is 2160p. Or roughly 3800 x 2000 pixels.

This means "4k" as 4 times the pixels, BUT its only double the resolution.  "4k" being something dreamt up by the TV manufacturers (I think Sony came up with it, along with 8k) as a marketing ploy.
Title: Re: 4K
Post by: Kevin Wood on 28 November 2015, 23:58:27
...I think Sony came up with it, along with 8k) as a marketing ploy.

Sony treating their customers with contempt? Nah. Pull the other one. ;)
Title: Re: 4K
Post by: BazaJT on 29 November 2015, 10:12:36
Ah,so no real benefit at least to me.Anything much above the 40" tv I've got would dwarf my room,so needing something over 50" would be pointless.Thanks for the info though.
Title: Re: 4K
Post by: Mr Skrunts on 30 November 2015, 09:41:55
it's basically twice the pixels wider and twice the pixels taller.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/4K_resolution
Title: Re: 4K
Post by: tigers_gonads on 30 November 2015, 10:39:56
At the end of the day it is a little like spending crazy money on hifi, if your eyes / ears ain't up to the job anymore and you don't have the sources, don't bother  ;)
Title: Re: 4K
Post by: zirk on 30 November 2015, 13:54:44
At the end of the day it is a little like spending crazy money on hifi, if your eyes / ears ain't up to the job anymore and you don't have the sources, don't bother  ;)
Who said that, where's me glasses, nothing wrong with my arms.
Title: Re: 4K
Post by: tigers_gonads on 02 December 2015, 11:30:55
At the end of the day it is a little like spending crazy money on hifi, if your eyes / ears ain't up to the job anymore and you don't have the sources, don't bother  ;)
Who said that, where's me glasses, nothing wrong with my arms.

 ;D
Title: Re: 4K
Post by: zirk on 02 December 2015, 15:49:27
Ah,so no real benefit at least to me.Anything much above the 40" tv I've got would dwarf my room,so needing something over 50" would be pointless.Thanks for the info though.
Also worth pointing out that under 40" you would really struggle to see the difference between 720p and 1080p content at a comfortable viewing distance anyway.

At 4k, apart from demo content, most new 4k media will be films in Cinema Scope, so you'd lose about 30% of your pixels anyway (upper and lower black bars, unless you want to chop the sides off), so until someone brings out a extra wide, wide TV screen to view Cinema wide content its all a bit pointless at the moment for home use.
Title: Re: 4K
Post by: BazaJT on 02 December 2015, 18:48:48
At least I don't have to bother updating to one of those then :y The 40" I've got now is 1080p,and given that my room is 14ft at it's widest/longest I've got a viewing distance of approx. 12ft.
Title: Re: 4K
Post by: zirk on 02 December 2015, 19:01:06
At least I don't have to bother updating to one of those then :y The 40" I've got now is 1080p,and given that my room is 14ft at it's widest/longest I've got a viewing distance of approx. 12ft.
12ft is a good viewing distance, especially over the Christmas period, your head is almost guaranteed to miss the telly when you fall over blind drunk. :y
Title: Re: 4K
Post by: Field Marshal Dr. Opti on 02 December 2015, 19:14:51
Whatever next?

Twenty years from now we'll all be watching televisions with flatter squarer tubes......Tosh. :)
Title: Re: 4K
Post by: STEMO on 02 December 2015, 19:17:45
My B+W 19" bush tv is just fine, cheap licence too.  ::)
Title: Re: 4K
Post by: Field Marshal Dr. Opti on 02 December 2015, 19:22:53
My B+W 19" bush tv is just fine, cheap licence too.  ::)

I'm envious. Even more envious than I am of your Astra. :)

I can still remember the first two televison sets we had 50 years ago.

A Stella followed by a Dynatron.  :y
Title: Re: 4K
Post by: Sir Tigger KC on 02 December 2015, 20:51:53
My B+W 19" bush tv is just fine, cheap licence too.  ::)

I'm envious. Even more envious than I am of your Astra. :)

I can still remember the first two televison sets we had 50 years ago.

A Stella followed by a Dynatron.  :y

They sound more like sextoys!  :-X  ;D
Title: Re: 4K
Post by: STEMO on 02 December 2015, 20:59:09
My B+W 19" bush tv is just fine, cheap licence too.  ::)

I'm envious. Even more envious than I am of your Astra. :)

I can still remember the first two televison sets we had 50 years ago.

A Stella followed by a Dynatron.  :y

They sound more like sextoys!  :-X  ;D
A drink followed by a fairground ride.
Title: Re: 4K
Post by: Field Marshal Dr. Opti on 02 December 2015, 22:35:31
My B+W 19" bush tv is just fine, cheap licence too.  ::)

I'm envious. Even more envious than I am of your Astra. :)

I can still remember the first two televison sets we had 50 years ago.

A Stella followed by a Dynatron.  :y

They sound more like sextoys!  :-X  ;D

Yes indeed. The Dynatron was the model prior to the Orgasmatron. :)