Omega Owners Forum

Chat Area => General Discussion Area => Topic started by: ozzycat on 07 November 2016, 21:01:30

Title: chrisigxer
Post by: ozzycat on 07 November 2016, 21:01:30
hi peeps
     could anybody tell me whats happend to chrisigxer as i havent seen him on the forum and when i try to pm him it comes back as non existant i only want to know how his sister is many thanks kev
Title: Re: chrisigxer
Post by: biggriffin on 07 November 2016, 21:05:00
A long story.
Somebody my be able to tell it better than me.
Title: Re: chrisigxer
Post by: zirk on 07 November 2016, 21:11:09
The Short version, He left.
Title: Re: chrisigxer
Post by: ozzycat on 07 November 2016, 21:38:59
The Short version, He left.
can anybody enlighten me or tell me how his sister is
Title: Re: chrisigxer
Post by: ozzycat on 07 November 2016, 21:47:44
hi mr wood could you move this in to gen diss please ive put it in the wrong place(old habits die hard) yjanks
Title: Re: chrisigxer
Post by: ozzycat on 07 November 2016, 22:09:34
thankyou :y :y :y :y :-X
Title: Re: chrisigxer
Post by: tigers_gonads on 07 November 2016, 22:20:31
Toys came out of the pram during a little spat on here Kev  ::)
He has been known to lurk in the background sometimes and I believe he has occasional use of a members PM address  :-X

Last time I heard, his sister was doing pretty well  :) :y

Shame really, he might have been a irritating bugger at times but he did put a hell of a lot into helping folks on here  :y :y
Title: Re: chrisigxer
Post by: Lazydocker on 08 November 2016, 09:34:45
Ozzy, you have PM ;)
Title: Re: chrisigxer
Post by: ozzycat on 08 November 2016, 12:15:24
Thanks for the pm LD :y :y :y
Title: Re: chrisigxer
Post by: Doctor Gollum on 08 November 2016, 17:28:43
The Short version, He was left.
Fixed for a degree of accuracy  :D
Title: Re: chrisigxer
Post by: TheBoy on 08 November 2016, 17:57:24
Indeed, he was banned.

I understand his sister, thankfully, is doing well :D
Title: Re: chrisigxer
Post by: STEMO on 08 November 2016, 18:02:18
Indeed, he was banned.

I understand his sister, thankfully, is doing well :D
Well unban him, he's done his time, guv.
Title: Re: chrisigxer
Post by: Shackeng on 08 November 2016, 18:33:50
Indeed, he was banned.

I understand his sister, thankfully, is doing well :D
Well unban him, he's done his time, guv.

 :y
Title: Re: chrisigxer
Post by: tigers_gonads on 08 November 2016, 18:40:00
Indeed, he was banned.

I understand his sister, thankfully, is doing well :D
Well unban him, he's done his time, guv.



That's the important bit  ::)

Its upto Chris if he wants to come back  ;)
Title: Re: chrisigxer
Post by: powerslinky on 08 November 2016, 20:22:13
I miss our footie banter Mr. Gixer

Waiting to give you some stick over Man U    ;D ;D
Title: Re: chrisigxer
Post by: JamesV6CDX on 08 November 2016, 20:23:02
I always got the impression Chris didn't care much for me. One one occasion I remember he was downright rude to me.

But I agree with the sentiment that he's done his time. I've learnt in recent months that differences often can be resolved, and feelings of tension disappear with time.

I personally think he should be invited back, if he chooses to decline that's his choice.

Why don't we have a poll? My vote would be a yes :y

Title: Re: chrisigxer
Post by: Entwood on 08 November 2016, 20:55:34
I always got the impression Chris didn't care much for me. One one occasion I remember he was downright rude to me.

But I agree with the sentiment that he's done his time. I've learnt in recent months that differences often can be resolved, and feelings of tension disappear with time.

I personally think he should be invited back, if he chooses to decline that's his choice.

Why don't we have a poll? My vote would be a yes :y

Sorry, disagree, this is NOT a democratically run site, it is run by TB and his hardworking moderators. It is their decision, and theirs alone, who is banned or allowed. Once we start "voting" for an individual to be allowed to join, just where do we draw the line?, do we have a vote every 3 days over who is next to be banned?, what topics should be closed? etc etc etc .. a very slippery slope we should not even start on IMHO .. :)
Title: Re: chrisigxer
Post by: Steve B on 08 November 2016, 21:03:22
I always got the impression Chris didn't care much for me. One one occasion I remember he was downright rude to me.

But I agree with the sentiment that he's done his time. I've learnt in recent months that differences often can be resolved, and feelings of tension disappear with time.

I personally think he should be invited back, if he chooses to decline that's his choice.

Why don't we have a poll? My vote would be a yes :y
I Dont blame Him  ;D ;D ;D ;D
Title: Re: chrisigxer
Post by: STEMO on 08 November 2016, 21:07:11
I always got the impression Chris didn't care much for me. One one occasion I remember he was downright rude to me.

But I agree with the sentiment that he's done his time. I've learnt in recent months that differences often can be resolved, and feelings of tension disappear with time.

I personally think he should be invited back, if he chooses to decline that's his choice.

Why don't we have a poll? My vote would be a yes :y
I Dont blame Him  ;D ;D ;D ;D

 ;D ;D Attaboy, Steve, you're learning.
Title: Re: chrisigxer
Post by: henryd on 08 November 2016, 21:39:46
I always got the impression Chris didn't care much for me. One one occasion I remember he was downright rude to me.

But I agree with the sentiment that he's done his time. I've learnt in recent months that differences often can be resolved, and feelings of tension disappear with time.

I personally think he should be invited back, if he chooses to decline that's his choice.

Why don't we have a poll? My vote would be a yes :y

Sorry, disagree, this is NOT a democratically run site, it is run by TB and his hardworking moderators. It is their decision, and theirs alone, who is banned or allowed. Once we start "voting" for an individual to be allowed to join, just where do we draw the line?, do we have a vote every 3 days over who is next to be banned?, what topics should be closed? etc etc etc .. a very slippery slope we should not even start on IMHO .. :)

Anyone with a VW............Oh shit,thats me gone too ::) ;D ;D
Title: Re: chrisigxer
Post by: Shackeng on 08 November 2016, 22:25:59
I always got the impression Chris didn't care much for me. One one occasion I remember he was downright rude to me.

But I agree with the sentiment that he's done his time. I've learnt in recent months that differences often can be resolved, and feelings of tension disappear with time.

I personally think he should be invited back, if he chooses to decline that's his choice.

Why don't we have a poll? My vote would be a yes :y

Sorry, disagree, this is NOT a democratically run site, it is run by TB and his hardworking moderators. It is their decision, and theirs alone, who is banned or allowed. Once we start "voting" for an individual to be allowed to join, just where do we draw the line?, do we have a vote every 3 days over who is next to be banned?, what topics should be closed? etc etc etc .. a very slippery slope we should not even start on IMHO .. :)

What are you after Nige, a nice Christmas prezzie? 8) :y
Title: Re: chrisigxer
Post by: Entwood on 08 November 2016, 22:27:13
I always got the impression Chris didn't care much for me. One one occasion I remember he was downright rude to me.

But I agree with the sentiment that he's done his time. I've learnt in recent months that differences often can be resolved, and feelings of tension disappear with time.

I personally think he should be invited back, if he chooses to decline that's his choice.

Why don't we have a poll? My vote would be a yes :y

Sorry, disagree, this is NOT a democratically run site, it is run by TB and his hardworking moderators. It is their decision, and theirs alone, who is banned or allowed. Once we start "voting" for an individual to be allowed to join, just where do we draw the line?, do we have a vote every 3 days over who is next to be banned?, what topics should be closed? etc etc etc .. a very slippery slope we should not even start on IMHO .. :)

What are you after Nige, a nice Christmas prezzie? 8) :y

Nah .. an invite to the OOF Xmas party ..  :)
Title: Re: chrisigxer
Post by: Terbs on 08 November 2016, 22:27:55
Irrespective of the why's and wherefore's, etc, of bans or whatever the circumstances of leaving....I personally got on well with Chris and H. He helped me and gave me advice, and was a workhorse at the Wycombe meetings, always helping someone. I only speak as I find :y
Title: Re: chrisigxer
Post by: zirk on 08 November 2016, 22:34:22
I think he was just felt embarrassed,                         .............having to live in Reading.
Title: Re: chrisigxer
Post by: ozzycat on 09 November 2016, 00:48:47
I allways got on well with Chris he helped me a lot and supported me when I was starting to get realy bad it's a shame realy he a very good chap I hope he dose come back :y :y
Title: Re: chrisigxer
Post by: biggriffin on 09 November 2016, 06:53:05
I always got the impression Chris didn't care much for me. One one occasion I remember he was downright rude to me.

But I agree with the sentiment that he's done his time. I've learnt in recent months that differences often can be resolved, and feelings of tension disappear with time.

I personally think he should be invited back, if he chooses to decline that's his choice.

Why don't we have a poll? My vote would be a yes :y

Sorry, disagree, this is NOT a democratically run site, it is run by TB and his hardworking moderators. It is their decision, and theirs alone, who is banned or allowed. Once we start "voting" for an individual to be allowed to join, just where do we draw the line?, do we have a vote every 3 days over who is next to be banned?, what topics should be closed? etc etc etc .. a very slippery slope we should not even start on IMHO .. :)

What are you after Nige, a nice Christmas prezzie? 8) :y

Nah .. an invite to the Hoof' land Xmas party ..  :)

Fixed. Still places.
Title: Re: chrisigxer
Post by: Shackeng on 09 November 2016, 11:38:05
I allways got on well with Chris he helped me a lot and supported me when I was starting to get realy bad it's a shame realy he a very good chap I hope he dose come back :y :y
[/highlight]

Agreed, he drove down to mine and fitted two lots of rear suspension bushes, in exchange for a pub lunch, which he didn't get as they had stopped serving! If you read this Chris the offer still stands. :y
Title: Re: chrisigxer
Post by: tigers_gonads on 10 November 2016, 12:42:15
What the opps is wrong with Gixer anyway  :-\

Alright, he pissed me off with that "hen pecking" comment so I offered him some cream for his itchy fanny  :D :D

I remember the innuendo's about TuBy and Oilman too  ::) :(

Did I miss something else or is it a secret  :-X :-X :-X

Title: Re: chrisigxer
Post by: Doctor Gollum on 10 November 2016, 16:36:47
As I understand it, it wasn't TB that banned him :-X
Title: Re: chrisigxer
Post by: TheBoy on 11 November 2016, 17:57:21
I always got the impression Chris didn't care much for me. One one occasion I remember he was downright rude to me.
Don't feel left out, he's rude to everyone ;D
Title: Re: chrisigxer
Post by: TheBoy on 11 November 2016, 17:59:11
Once we start "voting" for an individual to be allowed to join, just where do we draw the line?, do we have a vote every 3 days over who is next to be banned?
Mr gixer would vote everyone would be banned ;D

I shall ask him next time I see him who he wouldn't ban...  ...I'm not expecting any names to be forthcoming ;D
Title: Re: chrisigxer
Post by: STEMO on 11 November 2016, 19:32:27
Once we start "voting" for an individual to be allowed to join, just where do we draw the line?, do we have a vote every 3 days over who is next to be banned?
Mr gixer would vote everyone would be banned ;D

I shall ask him next time I see him who he wouldn't ban...  ...I'm not expecting any names to be forthcoming ;D
Me...he wouldn't ban little old me  :)
Title: Re: chrisigxer
Post by: TheBoy on 11 November 2016, 19:45:03
Once we start "voting" for an individual to be allowed to join, just where do we draw the line?, do we have a vote every 3 days over who is next to be banned?
Mr gixer would vote everyone would be banned ;D

I shall ask him next time I see him who he wouldn't ban...  ...I'm not expecting any names to be forthcoming ;D
Me...he wouldn't ban little old me  :)
Not before he's used and abused you, obviously :P
Title: Re: chrisigxer
Post by: STEMO on 11 November 2016, 20:21:11
Once we start "voting" for an individual to be allowed to join, just where do we draw the line?, do we have a vote every 3 days over who is next to be banned?
Mr gixer would vote everyone would be banned ;D

I shall ask him next time I see him who he wouldn't ban...  ...I'm not expecting any names to be forthcoming ;D
Me...he wouldn't ban little old me  :)
Not before he's used and abused you, obviously :P
Nothing wrong with that  ;D
Title: Re: chrisigxer
Post by: ozzycat on 12 November 2016, 02:43:59
Once we start "voting" for an individual to be allowed to join, just where do we draw the line?, do we have a vote every 3 days over who is next to be banned?
Mr gixer would vote everyone would be banned ;D

I shall ask him next time I see him who he wouldn't ban...  ...I'm not expecting any names to be forthcoming ;D
Me...he wouldn't ban little old me  :)
Not before he's used and abused you, obviously :P
Nothing wrong with that  ;D
its the mess that's got to be cleaned up after you've finished steve
Title: Re: chrisigxer
Post by: tigers_gonads on 12 November 2016, 19:36:17
As I understand it, it wasn't TB that banned him :-X




Oh dear   :o

Well if Chris isn't the messiah  ::)
Then he must be a very naughty boy then  :D :D
Title: Re: chrisigxer
Post by: ozzycat on 13 November 2016, 00:39:03
As I understand it, it wasn't TB that banned him :-X




Oh dear   :o

Well if Chris isn't the messiah  ::)
Then he must be a very naughty boy then  :D :D
hehehehe
Title: Re: chrisigxer
Post by: TheBoy on 13 November 2016, 16:37:18
I shall ask him next time I see him who he wouldn't ban...
The conclusion he came to was that he'd ban everyone, just not all at the same time ;D
Title: Re: chrisigxer
Post by: ozzycat on 13 November 2016, 17:19:55
I shall ask him next time I see him who he wouldn't ban...
The conclusion he came to was that he'd ban everyone, just not all at the same time ;D
the best way realy that way there's somebody here to answer the phone
Title: Re: chrisigxer
Post by: STEMO on 13 November 2016, 17:48:33
I shall ask him next time I see him who he wouldn't ban...
The conclusion he came to was that he'd ban everyone, just not all at the same time ;D
He'd never be wrong about anything ever again. Good plan  :y
Title: Re: chrisigxer
Post by: Nick W on 13 November 2016, 18:24:00
I shall ask him next time I see him who he wouldn't ban...
The conclusion he came to was that he'd ban everyone, just not all at the same time ;D
He'd never be wrong about anything ever again. Good plan  :y


Exactly. Hate everybody you meet, the moment you meet them. Weed out the ones that are worth knowing***

*** This rarely takes any effort or time.
Title: Re: chrisigxer
Post by: ozzycat on 14 November 2016, 11:31:19
I've opened a can of worms with this one