Omega Owners Forum

Chat Area => General Car Chat => Topic started by: Lagondanet on 10 May 2017, 11:03:41

Title: Jaguar S-type V8 4.2 R
Post by: Lagondanet on 10 May 2017, 11:03:41
Anyone care to share their views on this model. 1997-2008? Supercharged?
I seem to have a hankering.
Title: Re: Jaguar S-type V8 4.2 R
Post by: Viral_Jim on 10 May 2017, 11:20:23
Engine is generally robust, has been in plenty of things and uses established (read ancient) technology. The 4.0 v8s had an issue with losing the Nikasil lining off the bores, and with timing chain tensioners. However this didn't affect 4.2's and iirc all R's are 4.2. Also, it's generally accepted that the ones that are still running will either have recon'd engines (usually under warranty) or the liners were good from the factory.

As for the car, papa '944 ran a 3.0v6 for years, (from 25k to around 140k) generally reliable thing, facelift cars (around 2002 and denoted by an electronic handbrake) are a significant improvement. Changes to electronics improved reliability and pre facelifts go through suspension components as consumables. Early ones did suffer rusty sills (under plastic covers), but not as badly as x-types. If I were buying one, I'd have the sill covers off first. As with a lot of Jags (past and present) random electrical problems are often caused by a battery that's still functioning but past its prime. Oh and check the battery, it's in the boot iirc and can rot out the floor if it leaks ::)

Generally they have a reputation for being a handful in the wet and fuel consumption is around 14-27 for the v8 depending on the weight of your right foot.
Title: Re: Jaguar S-type V8 4.2 R
Post by: tunnie on 10 May 2017, 11:21:07
Ford era, not a true Jag I don't think. All other versions I would not be interested in one bit, but the supercharged lump could make it interesting.

However, I'd much prefer an XF-R  :)
Title: Re: Jaguar S-type V8 4.2 R
Post by: Viral_Jim on 10 May 2017, 11:22:57
Ford era, not a true Jag I don't think.

True, it's why most of them...um... worked ;D
Title: Re: Jaguar S-type V8 4.2 R
Post by: Marks DTM Calib on 10 May 2017, 11:39:55
Ford era, not a true Jag I don't think. All other versions I would not be interested in one bit, but the supercharged lump could make it interesting.

However, I'd much prefer an XF-R  :)

Full Ford ownership was 1999 onwards, unlikely to be a lot of Ford influence on the designs at that stage (given car design is around a 5-7 year process), may well be some Ford parts.
Title: Re: Jaguar S-type V8 4.2 R
Post by: tunnie on 10 May 2017, 11:58:47
Ford era, not a true Jag I don't think. All other versions I would not be interested in one bit, but the supercharged lump could make it interesting.

However, I'd much prefer an XF-R  :)

Full Ford ownership was 1999 onwards, unlikely to be a lot of Ford influence on the designs at that stage (given car design is around a 5-7 year process), may well be some Ford parts.

Stand corrected... I thought it was some American/Ford hybrid.  :-\
Title: Re: Jaguar S-type V8 4.2 R
Post by: henryd on 10 May 2017, 12:06:50
Ford era, not a true Jag I don't think. All other versions I would not be interested in one bit, but the supercharged lump could make it interesting.

However, I'd much prefer an XF-R  :)

Full Ford ownership was 1999 onwards, unlikely to be a lot of Ford influence on the designs at that stage (given car design is around a 5-7 year process), may well be some Ford parts.

Stand corrected... I thought it was some American/Ford hybrid.  :-\

I thought the S type ran a Lincoln/Ford thunderbird running gear albeit modified

edit, yes it did  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jaguar_S-Type
Title: Re: Jaguar S-type V8 4.2 R
Post by: omegod on 10 May 2017, 12:31:52
Wasn't Elite Pete running a V8 S type?
Title: Re: Jaguar S-type V8 4.2 R
Post by: henryd on 10 May 2017, 14:56:58
Wasn't Elite Pete running a V8 S type?

I think he still is :y
Title: Re: Jaguar S-type V8 4.2 R
Post by: Doctor Gollum on 10 May 2017, 15:03:55
Wasn't Elite Pete running a V8 S type?

I think he still is :y
That's a good sign :y he was never one to keep an Omega intact for any length of time ::)
Title: Re: Jaguar S-type V8 4.2 R
Post by: henryd on 10 May 2017, 15:43:40
I had a 3.0 V6 S type in for the day a few weeks back and was quite impressed with it,250 bhp so no slouch either :y
Title: Re: Jaguar S-type V8 4.2 R
Post by: btc on 10 May 2017, 17:46:28
I ran one for almost a year without any issues did around 9000 miles averaged 22 mpg comfy and quick but can have a wayward back end in the wet only sold as my back is getting bad and I had trouble getting in and out  :y
Title: Re: Jaguar S-type V8 4.2 R
Post by: TheBoy on 10 May 2017, 18:47:03
The ZF sourced 6 speed auto from around that era can be unreliable. Other than that, corrosion and niggly electrical faults are the biggest issues normally.
Title: Re: Jaguar S-type V8 4.2 R
Post by: Elite Pete on 10 May 2017, 20:28:43
Wasn't Elite Pete running a V8 S type?

I think he still is :y

Yep :y
Title: Re: Jaguar S-type V8 4.2 R
Post by: Lagondanet on 19 May 2017, 18:59:35
Wasn't Elite Pete running a V8 S type?

I think he still is :y

Yep :y



And...your views?

or maybe similar era XJR V8 supercharged?  Compare?

Thanks for your opinions/advice.

Title: Re: Jaguar S-type V8 4.2 R
Post by: Field Marshal Dr. Opti on 19 May 2017, 19:14:27
XF SV8 built from 2008 onward?

Same 4.2 supercharged lump. Pretty rare these cars. :y
Title: Re: Jaguar S-type V8 4.2 R
Post by: Viral_Jim on 19 May 2017, 22:06:20
Is that like an R but with softer suspension then?
Title: Re: Jaguar S-type V8 4.2 R
Post by: Field Marshal Dr. Opti on 20 May 2017, 12:31:43
Is that like an R but with softer suspension then?

The SV8 was the interim 'hot XF' model only built 2008/9........so pretty rare.

It was no slouch though with a 416 BHP 4.2 litre supercharged V8. :y

It was replaced by the frugal, nippy, and environmentally friendly XFR in 2009 :)  with a 5.0 supercharged V8.