Omega Owners Forum

Chat Area => General Discussion Area => Topic started by: BazaJT on 25 March 2018, 13:09:39

Title: Historic?
Post by: BazaJT on 25 March 2018, 13:09:39
I see the first non-stop passenger flight from Australia to England has just been done.Apparently it landed a few minutes ahead of the estimated time and doing the journey in one go shaves something like 3hrs off the usual time taken when stopping in the middle east for fuel/change of aircraft.
Title: Re: Historic?
Post by: Lizzie Zoom on 25 March 2018, 14:05:30
Historic indeed; another great milestone in aviation! 8) 8)
Title: Re: Historic?
Post by: Varche on 25 March 2018, 19:13:19
I vowed after 5 hours transatlantic that was it. 17 hours in the air?  :o :o
Title: Re: Historic?
Post by: Mister Rog on 25 March 2018, 22:53:13
I vowed after 5 hours transatlantic that was it. 17 hours in the air?  :o :o

I avoid flying whenever possible, but I would have thought that a bit of a break would be good rather than 17 hours and DVT  ::)  And with time differences etc, do 3 hours really matter ?
Title: Re: Historic?
Post by: aaronjb on 26 March 2018, 09:01:07
For me, it's not a question of three hours - it's the hassle and stress of trying to clear immigration/security/etc in the transit airport, get from gate to gate, hope that your first flight wasn't delayed because, if it was, you've probably missed your connecting flight etc.

I'd much rather get on, go there, and get off where I intended to be. In fact, I fairly regularly travel to Seattle for work and I much, much prefer the 9-9.5hr direct flight than the hassle of transiting via anywhere - especially as, every time I've done that, there has been a lot of additional stress, lost luggage, almost missed flights, cancelled connections etc.

.. of course, the new direct route is to Perth. Who wants to go to Perth?
Title: Re: Historic?
Post by: Kevin Wood on 26 March 2018, 09:29:02
.. of course, the new direct route is to Perth. Who wants to go to Perth?

But from Perth you can get a connecting flight to.. Oh, Wait! ::)
Title: Re: Historic?
Post by: aaronjb on 26 March 2018, 09:34:11
.. of course, the new direct route is to Perth. Who wants to go to Perth?

But from Perth you can get a connecting flight to.. Oh, Wait! ::)

Exactly ;D

I suppose it's only a short 41hr drive to Sydney...
Title: Re: Historic?
Post by: deviator on 26 March 2018, 09:42:23
.. of course, the new direct route is to Perth. Who wants to go to Perth?

But from Perth you can get a connecting flight to.. Oh, Wait! ::)

Exactly ;D

I suppose it's only a short 41hr drive to Sydney...

Just take an Uber. Oh.
Title: Re: Historic?
Post by: LC0112G on 26 March 2018, 10:26:59
The first civil UK (Heathrow) to Sydney non stop was done back in 1989 and took just over 20 hours. There were only 16 passengers on board though. http://www.airwaysmuseum.com/Qantas%201st%20England-Aust%20non-stop%201989.htm. The RAF hold the record for UK->Perth at around 16 hours, but that does include two in-flight refuelings.

For me the daftest part of the traditional Kangaroo route is the insistence on departing LHR at night (typically 9PM-11PM), bouncing through some mid point for a 2 hour refuelling break (Bankok, Singapore, or the mid-east) and then arriving in SYD at 5-6AM. That may work for business and first class passengers with lay flat seats and beds, but for the cattle down the back (like me) arriving after a 22-24 hr flight at 5AM, and then facing staying awake for another 12 hours till it gets dark again to avoid near fatal jet lag is dreadful.

Much much better to get the noon flights (11AM-1PM), arrive in SYD at 6-8PM and go straight to bed. However, the number of lunchtime flights has dramatically reduced in recent times presumably because economy passengers aren't profitable, but business/first class passengers are.

The way home is more difficult. You can get back in the same day, but only from Darwin leaving at about 6AM, and arriving at LHR around 6PM. Virtually everything else arrives LHR at 5-9AM which leaves you with similar jetlag issues. Much better to get a daytime flight SYD->SIN, overnight in Singapore, then a daytime SIN->LHR. Plus it allows you to read off the mil ramps at Changi from the cactus garden near the Burger King (or is that just me  ;D).

And I'd rather walk than use BA or Qantas.
Title: Re: Historic?
Post by: Varche on 26 March 2018, 11:53:36
For me, it's not a question of three hours - it's the hassle and stress of trying to clear immigration/security/etc in the transit airport, get from gate to gate, hope that your first flight wasn't delayed because, if it was, you've probably missed your connecting flight etc.

I'd much rather get on, go there, and get off where I intended to be. In fact, I fairly regularly travel to Seattle for work and I much, much prefer the 9-9.5hr direct flight than the hassle of transiting via anywhere - especially as, every time I've done that, there has been a lot of additional stress, lost luggage, almost missed flights, cancelled connections etc.

.. of course, the new direct route is to Perth. Who wants to go to Perth?

Lot of UK expats live in Perth including my brother in law and family. They cannot wait to use the service rather than the old style stopover with all the hassle as described. Not for me. I would consider driving though............  They wouldn't put the service on if it wasn't going to make money.
Title: Re: Historic?
Post by: redelitev6 on 26 March 2018, 18:31:12
17 hours in the air ? ye gods , i can just about cope with the flight to Turkey  :o
Title: Re: Historic?
Post by: Entwood on 26 March 2018, 19:04:47
17 hours ... ?? Just over 1/2 my longest flight (30 hours 35 minutes) .. although that did include 3 air-to-air refuels ...... :)
Title: Re: Historic?
Post by: Bigron on 26 March 2018, 19:08:02
What did you do Nige - tie a knot in it?  ::)

Ron.
Title: Re: Historic?
Post by: TheBoy on 26 March 2018, 19:21:52
I have to tolerate going to America this year, and that's only 7hrs.  That's about double my flying limit.
Title: Re: Historic?
Post by: Gaffers on 26 March 2018, 19:34:24
Range of a normally-laiden 787-9 = 14,260km
LON > Perth = 14,468km

They must be limiting capacity in order to make it which means they will up the fares to compensate.
Title: Re: Historic?
Post by: Entwood on 26 March 2018, 19:42:26
What did you do Nige - tie a knot in it?  ::)

Ron.

No need .. the facilities on the C130 Hercules were 2nd to none ..... (believe that and you'll believe anything!! .. but we did have proper urinals and a "bucket-and-chuckit" chemical toilet ...  :)  )
Title: Re: Historic?
Post by: Doctor Gollum on 26 March 2018, 19:52:14
What did you do Nige - tie a knot in it?  ::)

Ron.

No need .. the facilities on the C130 Hercules were 2nd to none ..... (believe that and you'll believe anything!! .. but we did have proper urinals and a "bucket-and-chuckit" chemical toilet ...  :)  )
Not to mention the sodding great big self flushing hole at the back :D
Title: Re: Historic?
Post by: Entwood on 26 March 2018, 19:56:38
What did you do Nige - tie a knot in it?  ::)

Ron.

No need .. the facilities on the C130 Hercules were 2nd to none ..... (believe that and you'll believe anything!! .. but we did have proper urinals and a "bucket-and-chuckit" chemical toilet ...  :)  )
Not to mention the sodding great big self flushing hole at the back :D

Not a lot of use at 28,000 ft ... depressurising to open that would be a tad painful and "might" just lead to a "slight" shortage of breath as well as rather cold "bits" ...  :)  :)  :)
Title: Re: Historic?
Post by: Gaffers on 26 March 2018, 20:05:37
What did you do Nige - tie a knot in it?  ::)

Ron.

No need .. the facilities on the C130 Hercules were 2nd to none ..... (believe that and you'll believe anything!! .. but we did have proper urinals and a "bucket-and-chuckit" chemical toilet ...  :)  )
Not to mention the sodding great big self flushing hole at the back :D

Not a lot of use at 28,000 ft ... depressurising to open that would be a tad painful and "might" just lead to a "slight" shortage of breath as well as rather cold "bits" ...  :)  :)  :)

Not to mention disposing of the 'privacy shower curtain' in a rather dramatic fashion ::)
Title: Re: Historic?
Post by: Doctor Gollum on 26 March 2018, 20:22:31
Range of a normally-laiden 787-9 = 14,260km
LON > Perth = 14,468km

They must be limiting capacity in order to make it which means they will up the fares to compensate.
The 789 is a deceptively large aircraft... Possible that they aren't planning on carrying freight on that route :-\
Title: Re: Historic?
Post by: Doctor Gollum on 26 March 2018, 20:23:01
What did you do Nige - tie a knot in it?  ::)

Ron.

No need .. the facilities on the C130 Hercules were 2nd to none ..... (believe that and you'll believe anything!! .. but we did have proper urinals and a "bucket-and-chuckit" chemical toilet ...  :)  )
Not to mention the sodding great big self flushing hole at the back :D

Not a lot of use at 28,000 ft ... depressurising to open that would be a tad painful and "might" just lead to a "slight" shortage of breath as well as rather cold "bits" ...  :)  :)  :)

Not to mention disposing of the 'privacy shower curtain' in a rather dramatic fashion ::)
Well, there is that :D
Title: Re: Historic?
Post by: Gaffers on 26 March 2018, 20:55:32
Range of a normally-laiden 787-9 = 14,260km
LON > Perth = 14,468km

They must be limiting capacity in order to make it which means they will up the fares to compensate.
The 789 is a deceptively large aircraft... Possible that they aren't planning on carrying freight on that route :-\

Just wait until the A350-1000 comes in to service in Europe. :y
Title: Re: Historic?
Post by: Doctor Gollum on 26 March 2018, 22:32:53
787-10 shouldn't be too far behind it 8)

The standard A350 is another aircraft that is bigger than it looks... Prettier than the A380, but the Dreamliner is a more elegant design... Something about the shape of the nose reminds me of the Comet...

Title: Re: Historic?
Post by: Entwood on 26 March 2018, 22:55:50
What did you do Nige - tie a knot in it?  ::)

Ron.

No need .. the facilities on the C130 Hercules were 2nd to none ..... (believe that and you'll believe anything!! .. but we did have proper urinals and a "bucket-and-chuckit" chemical toilet ...  :)  )
Not to mention the sodding great big self flushing hole at the back :D

Not a lot of use at 28,000 ft ... depressurising to open that would be a tad painful and "might" just lead to a "slight" shortage of breath as well as rather cold "bits" ...  :)  :)  :)

Not to mention disposing of the 'privacy shower curtain' in a rather dramatic fashion ::)

Curtain only of use if you actually lower the bucket into position before use ..... and yes .. I've seen a passenger climb up and try to use it in the stowed position ........  :)  :)
Title: Re: Historic?
Post by: Gaffers on 26 March 2018, 22:58:43
787-10 shouldn't be too far behind it 8)

The standard A350 is another aircraft that is bigger than it looks... Prettier than the A380, but the Dreamliner is a more elegant design... Something about the shape of the nose reminds me of the Comet...



3x3 in the back. Can do 3-4-3 but it's very cramped. The amount of IT on board these things now is incredible. Will keep me in a job for a while :D
Title: Re: Historic?
Post by: Lazydocker on 27 March 2018, 09:05:37
I’m certainly looking forward to using the Direct flight in the future... Dubai to Melbourne is 16 hours so the extra hour makes it worth it (if flying Direct with no stopover). I’d then seriously consider driving from Perth to Melbourne when doing it.

As for flight times... We had a midday(ish) departure from LHR and arrived into Melbourne late evening... Virtually no jet lag at all going out there but it hit me like a ton of bricks about 5 days after getting back to the UK - just as I was getting back into work ::)

What people forget is that long haul flights are not in the same league as short haul when it comes to comfort and facilities, especially if you have a young child and get the bulkhead seats 😉
Title: Re: Historic?
Post by: Sir Tigger KC on 27 March 2018, 09:33:06
I’d then seriously re consider driving from Perth to Melbourne when doing it.


FTFY LD  :)

That's a great drive to do once for the adventure.  :y

The reality is that much of it is a very long boring drive through flat scrubby desert.  One well known stretch the '90 mile straight' is notable, but there are lots of 89,88,87 etc etc straights as well!  ::)

It took me 3 days in an elderly Ford Cortina which I rarely took over 70mph and it's not advisable to drive across the Nullabor Desert or the vast farmlands at night as feral camels tend to settle down on the warm tarmac at night and Kangaroos have a habit of jumping out!  :o

You regularly see massive bloodstains on the road where a Kangaroo has jumped out in front of a roadtrain!  ::)

Believe it or not the Western Australia Police patrol with planes to catch people speeding!  ::)  It really is the absolute middle of butt opps nowhere!  ::)  ;D
Title: Re: Historic?
Post by: Lazydocker on 27 March 2018, 11:26:21
I’d then seriously re consider driving from Perth to Melbourne when doing it.


FTFY LD  :)

That's a great drive to do once for the adventure.  :y

The reality is that much of it is a very long boring drive through flat scrubby desert.  One well known stretch the '90 mile straight' is notable, but there are lots of 89,88,87 etc etc straights as well!  ::)

It took me 3 days in an elderly Ford Cortina which I rarely took over 70mph and it's not advisable to drive across the Nullabor Desert or the vast farmlands at night as feral camels tend to settle down on the warm tarmac at night and Kangaroos have a habit of jumping out!  :o

You regularly see massive bloodstains on the road where a Kangaroo has jumped out in front of a roadtrain!  ::)

Believe it or not the Western Australia Police patrol with planes to catch people speeding!  ::)  It really is the absolute middle of butt opps nowhere!  ::)  ;D

Yep. Seriously looked at it last time we are there ;)

Looking at the prices I’ve just been emailed they have loaded the economy price for LHR - Perth... It’s cheaper to fly to Melbourne. Premium Economy is, however, slightly cheaper than the Melbourne flights.

I think we will actually have a couple of days layover in Bubai next time though
Title: Re: Historic?
Post by: Sir Tigger KC on 27 March 2018, 15:08:43
I’d then seriously re consider driving from Perth to Melbourne when doing it.


FTFY LD  :)

That's a great drive to do once for the adventure.  :y

The reality is that much of it is a very long boring drive through flat scrubby desert.  One well known stretch the '90 mile straight' is notable, but there are lots of 89,88,87 etc etc straights as well!  ::)

It took me 3 days in an elderly Ford Cortina which I rarely took over 70mph and it's not advisable to drive across the Nullabor Desert or the vast farmlands at night as feral camels tend to settle down on the warm tarmac at night and Kangaroos have a habit of jumping out!  :o

You regularly see massive bloodstains on the road where a Kangaroo has jumped out in front of a roadtrain!  ::)

Believe it or not the Western Australia Police patrol with planes to catch people speeding!  ::)  It really is the absolute middle of butt opps nowhere!  ::)  ;D

Yep. Seriously looked at it last time we are there ;)

Looking at the prices I’ve just been emailed they have loaded the economy price for LHR - Perth... It’s cheaper to fly to Melbourne. Premium Economy is, however, slightly cheaper than the Melbourne flights.

I think we will actually have a couple of days layover in Bubai next time though

I got that wrong.  ::)

It was 3 days from Adelaide to Perth!  ;)  Melbourne to Adelaide was another 2 days IIRC.  :)

We took 3 weeks to drive from Sydney to Perth.  Although that allowed for a fair few drinking days!  ;D


We may have got entangled with members of the fairer sex as well, which held us up a bit here and there!  8)
Title: Re: Historic?
Post by: Lagondanet on 27 March 2018, 19:35:20
Great! When will they do Adelaide direct? I can go and see my mum.