Omega Owners Forum
Chat Area => General Car Chat => Topic started by: Viral_Jim on 24 September 2019, 23:57:59
-
It's a pretty penny. But a super cool motor. 8)
https://www.topgear.com/car-news/retro/mercedes-museum-selling-stunning-w126-s-class (https://www.topgear.com/car-news/retro/mercedes-museum-selling-stunning-w126-s-class)
-
Lovely.
-
Beautiful car
-
I thought DG had finished TAXI driving :-\
yes..... I'm not a fan of old Mercs :D ;D
-
£42k is a bit steep for a manual 280SE, even if it's effectively brand new.
Still nice though 8)
-
Call that a classic Merc?
This is one I love and would call a real "Classic":
(https://i.postimg.cc/Y0L9gKLS/Hitlers-Merc-770-Groser.jpg)
Just a shame about the owner of this 1940 Mercedes 770 Groser!! :o :o ;D ;D ;)
-
Most definitely not my cup of tea...
-
Call that a classic Merc?
This is one I love and would call a real "Classic":
(https://i.postimg.cc/Y0L9gKLS/Hitlers-Merc-770-Groser.jpg)
Just a shame about the owner of this 1940 Mercedes 770 Groser!! :o :o ;D ;D ;)
Mother Teresa?...... ::)
-
Call that a classic Merc?
This is one I love and would call a real "Classic":
(https://i.postimg.cc/Y0L9gKLS/Hitlers-Merc-770-Groser.jpg)
Just a shame about the owner of this 1940 Mercedes 770 Groser!! :o :o ;D ;D ;)
First name wasn't Adolf by any chance ::) ???
-
Call that a classic Merc?
This is one I love and would call a real "Classic":
(https://i.postimg.cc/Y0L9gKLS/Hitlers-Merc-770-Groser.jpg)
Just a shame about the owner of this 1940 Mercedes 770 Groser!! :o :o ;D ;D ;)
Mother Teresa?...... ::)
;D ;D ;D ;)
-
Call that a classic Merc?
This is one I love and would call a real "Classic":
(https://i.postimg.cc/Y0L9gKLS/Hitlers-Merc-770-Groser.jpg)
Just a shame about the owner of this 1940 Mercedes 770 Groser!! :o :o ;D ;D ;)
First name wasn't Adolf by any chance ::) ???
;D ;D ;D :y
-
In a not-too-dissimilar vein - an alternative way to spend a similar sum. Chauffeur required though...
https://www.pistonheads.com/regulars/ph-spottedykywt/maybach-62--the-brave-pill/40993 (https://www.pistonheads.com/regulars/ph-spottedykywt/maybach-62--the-brave-pill/40993)
-
In a not-too-dissimilar vein - an alternative way to spend a similar sum. Chauffeur required though...
https://www.pistonheads.com/regulars/ph-spottedykywt/maybach-62--the-brave-pill/40993 (https://www.pistonheads.com/regulars/ph-spottedykywt/maybach-62--the-brave-pill/40993)
'Fookin orrible'.... :-X
-
Looks like one of those awful Chinese copies of a luxury motor car as previously stated F***ing horrible.
-
It reminds me of a large Rover, especially looking at the lines of the back end! :D :D ;)
-
It reminds me of a large Rover, especially looking at the lines of the back end! :D :D ;)
Similar side profile to a Rover 75 although the Rover better looking :y
-
It reminds me of a large Rover, especially looking at the lines of the back end! :D :D ;)
Similar side profile to a Rover 75 although the Rover better looking :y
That's the one! :y
-
It reminds me of a large Rover, especially looking at the lines of the back end! :D :D ;)
Similar side profile to a Rover 75 although the Rover better looking :y
You know you've hit rock bottom when you find that you prefer a Rover 75. ;D
-
It reminds me of a large Rover, especially looking at the lines of the back end! :D :D ;)
Similar side profile to a Rover 75 although the Rover better looking :y
You know you've hit rock bottom when you find that you prefer a Rover 75. ;D
Indeed! ;D ;D ;D
I looked up the facts about that Rover 75, and was surprised it was only produced over just 7 years. I was also shocked to read it is considered as Rover's brands "best models"!! :o :o It has also a strong following on Rover Clubs ;)
:)
-
I rather liked them, but they were too much money for something that didn't have a BMW, Merc or Audi badge. ::)
There was also a very small number produced with the same 4.6l V8 that was in the P38 FFRR of the day. Quite an undertaking when you consider that all other variants of the car were FWD!
-
We has an mgzt190+ 2.5 v6. Very hard ride but it stuck like glue.
-
It reminds me of a large Rover, especially looking at the lines of the back end! :D :D ;)
Similar side profile to a Rover 75 although the Rover better looking :y
You know you've hit rock bottom when you find that you prefer a Rover 75. ;D
Indeed! ;D ;D ;D
I looked up the facts about that Rover 75, and was surprised it was only produced over just 7 years. I was also shocked to read it is considered as Rover's brands "best models"!! :o :o It has also a strong following on Rover Clubs ;)
:)
why shocked? They're just what a 90s Rover should be, and are excellent cars as a result. A manual, 1.8t 75 estate is top of my list as an Omega replacement as it ticks the same list of requirements that the Omega did 10 years ago. I don't like the MGs because of their ugly cheap interiors and uncomfortable suspensions. V6s don't add enough to the turbo 4 pot to be worth the large increase in running costs.
-
I rather liked them, but they were too much money for something that didn't have a BMW, Merc or Audi badge. ::)
There was also a very small number produced with the same 4.6l V8 that was in the P38 FFRR of the day. Quite an undertaking when you consider that all other variants of the car were FWD!
there's a lot of 3 series BMW underneath.
-
I rather liked them, but they were too much money for something that didn't have a BMW, Merc or Audi badge. ::)
There was also a very small number produced with the same 4.6l V8 that was in the P38 FFRR of the day. Quite an undertaking when you consider that all other variants of the car were FWD!
The 4.6 was out of a Ford Mustang and could be super charged to 400 + ponies if desired
-
It reminds me of a large Rover, especially looking at the lines of the back end! :D :D ;)
Similar side profile to a Rover 75 although the Rover better looking :y
You know you've hit rock bottom when you find that you prefer a Rover 75. ;D
Indeed! ;D ;D ;D
I looked up the facts about that Rover 75, and was surprised it was only produced over just 7 years. I was also shocked to read it is considered as Rover's brands "best models"!! :o :o It has also a strong following on Rover Clubs ;)
:)
why shocked? They're just what a 90s Rover should be, and are excellent cars as a result. A manual, 1.8t 75 estate is top of my list as an Omega replacement as it ticks the same list of requirements that the Omega did 10 years ago. I don't like the MGs because of their ugly cheap interiors and uncomfortable suspensions. V6s don't add enough to the turbo 4 pot to be worth the large increase in running costs.
I've had a 18T in saloon form and a 2.0 cdti Mg in estate form,I liked both of them :y,the 18T was pretty lively
-
We has an mgzt190+ 2.5 v6. Very hard ride but it stuck like glue.
I always thought the MG variants didn't really have the go to back up the big wheels and spoilers, a bit all mouth and very little trouser...
That said, i always thought the V6 to be an ok lump for what it was.
The 4.6 was out of a Ford Mustang and could be super charged to 400 + ponies if desired
I stand corrected, I'd always thought it was the same GM derived lump that went into a million other things in various capacities (inc 5.0 in TVR iirc).
-
I've had a 18T in saloon form and a 2.0 cdti Mg in estate form,I liked both of them :y,the 18T was pretty lively
Head gaskets were always a weakness on the K-series I seem to remember, or are better parts now available to cure the issue?
-
We has an mgzt190+ 2.5 v6. Very hard ride but it stuck like glue.
I always thought the MG variants didn't really have the go to back up the big wheels and spoilers, a bit all mouth and very little trouser...
That said, i always thought the V6 to be an ok lump for what it was.
The 4.6 was out of a Ford Mustang and could be super charged to 400 + ponies if desired
I stand corrected, I'd always thought it was the same GM derived lump that went into a million other things in various capacities (inc 5.0 in TVR iirc).
The 190 didnt hang around :y
-
I've had a 18T in saloon form and a 2.0 cdti Mg in estate form,I liked both of them :y,the 18T was pretty lively
Head gaskets were always a weakness on the K-series I seem to remember, or are better parts now available to cure the issue?
Latest gaskets have all but finished those issues :y
-
We has an mgzt190+ 2.5 v6. Very hard ride but it stuck like glue.
I always thought the MG variants didn't really have the go to back up the big wheels and spoilers, a bit all mouth and very little trouser...
That said, i always thought the V6 to be an ok lump for what it was.
The 4.6 was out of a Ford Mustang and could be super charged to 400 + ponies if desired
I stand corrected, I'd always thought it was the same GM derived lump that went into a million other things in various capacities (inc 5.0 in TVR iirc).
Yes, the one we had was shod with 18" very low profiles, £180 a corner even back then. And it ate the front ones in 10,000 miles. It was quite quick, but not as quick as the rover 623Sli we had with the 2.3 Honda engine. That was really torquey.
-
I rather liked them, but they were too much money for something that didn't have a BMW, Merc or Audi badge. ::)
There was also a very small number produced with the same 4.6l V8 that was in the P38 FFRR of the day. Quite an undertaking when you consider that all other variants of the car were FWD!
Ford lump from the Mustang ;) bit newer than the P38...
-
I rather liked them, but they were too much money for something that didn't have a BMW, Merc or Audi badge. ::)
There was also a very small number produced with the same 4.6l V8 that was in the P38 FFRR of the day. Quite an undertaking when you consider that all other variants of the car were FWD!
Ford lump from the Mustang ;) bit newer than the P38...
Cough,there's an echo here ;D
-
I rather liked them, but they were too much money for something that didn't have a BMW, Merc or Audi badge. ::)
There was also a very small number produced with the same 4.6l V8 that was in the P38 FFRR of the day. Quite an undertaking when you consider that all other variants of the car were FWD!
Ford lump from the Mustang ;) bit newer than the P38...
Cough,there's an echo here ;D
Isn't there a Ford Mustang Pony on the plenum to remind us where the engine is from? :y
-
I rather liked them, but they were too much money for something that didn't have a BMW, Merc or Audi badge. ::)
There was also a very small number produced with the same 4.6l V8 that was in the P38 FFRR of the day. Quite an undertaking when you consider that all other variants of the car were FWD!
Ford lump from the Mustang ;) bit newer than the P38...
Cough,there's an echo here ;D
Isn't there a Ford Mustang Pony on the plenum to remind us where the engine is from? :y
I'd sooner have the emblem on the top of a P51 Mustang engine! ::) ::) :P ;D ;)
-
We has an mgzt190+ 2.5 v6. Very hard ride but it stuck like glue.
I always thought the MG variants didn't really have the go to back up the big wheels and spoilers, a bit all mouth and very little trouser...
Exactly my experience. A mate of mine had one. Sounded fantastic. Couldn't pull the skin off a wet rice pudding*. ;D
* - not strictly true, but if I was going for V8 running costs I'd want a lot more go in return.
-
I rather liked them, but they were too much money for something that didn't have a BMW, Merc or Audi badge. ::)
There was also a very small number produced with the same 4.6l V8 that was in the P38 FFRR of the day. Quite an undertaking when you consider that all other variants of the car were FWD!
Ford lump from the Mustang ;) bit newer than the P38...
Cough,there's an echo here ;D
Isn't there a Ford Mustang Pony on the plenum to remind us where the engine is from? :y
I'd sooner have the emblem on the top of a P51 Mustang engine! ::) ::) :P ;D ;)
me too,Rolls finest :y
-
I rather liked them, but they were too much money for something that didn't have a BMW, Merc or Audi badge. ::)
There was also a very small number produced with the same 4.6l V8 that was in the P38 FFRR of the day. Quite an undertaking when you consider that all other variants of the car were FWD!
Ford lump from the Mustang ;) bit newer than the P38...
it's just the base spec 260hp 4.6 Ford used in everything. After measuring the output on the same dyno that rated a 3.0l Essex at 138hp ;D . It sounds better than it is. Although the Rover has got to weigh less than a Mustang....
-
Isn't there a Ford Mustang Pony on the plenum to remind us where the engine is from? :y
I'd sooner have the emblem on the top of a P51 Mustang engine! ::) ::) :P ;D ;)
me too,Rolls finest :y
comprehensively re-engineered by Packard to make more power, last longer and be mass produced in enough numbers to make a long term difference.