Omega Owners Forum

Chat Area => General Discussion Area => Topic started by: ronnyd on 29 January 2020, 21:06:08

Title: Norton
Post by: ronnyd on 29 January 2020, 21:06:08
Just reading on BBC news website that Norton Motorcycles have fallen into administration. Hope it can be saved. Seems they owed a 300k tax bill.
Title: Re: Norton
Post by: Bigron on 29 January 2020, 21:25:19
£300k is peanuts to the government, so they could easily bale Norton out; or simply waive the tax bill.

Ron.
Title: Re: Norton
Post by: Migv6 le Frog Fan on 29 January 2020, 21:41:38
Norton has had more comebacks than Sinatra. Imo those who keep trying to revive it are flogging a dead horse.
Title: Re: Norton
Post by: Viral_Jim on 29 January 2020, 21:51:50
Norton has had more comebacks than Sinatra. Imo those who keep trying to revive it are flogging a dead horse.
This. We're now well past the time when 'handmade in britain' was a passable excuse for shoddy build quality at a high price.

Just ask Nikolay Smolensky  ;)
Title: Re: Norton
Post by: Migv6 le Frog Fan on 30 January 2020, 06:45:07
If it was done properly, as Triumph was, then it could be a success, but it has always been a case of a bit of venture capitalist funding, couple with some wide boy management and a few well meaning enthusiasts trying to punch way above their weight.
They had some success with the rotary,s in the 80,s / 90,s but apart from that its been big press announcements with very little to back it up.
Title: Re: Norton
Post by: Field Marshal Dr. Opti on 30 January 2020, 11:20:20
If it was done properly, as Triumph was, then it could be a success, but it has always been a case of a bit of venture capitalist funding, couple with some wide boy management and a few well meaning enthusiasts trying to punch way above their weight.
They had some success with the rotary,s in the 80,s / 90,s but apart from that its been big press announcements with very little to back it up.


A 2500 cc triple holds a certain appeal
Title: Re: Norton
Post by: STEMO on 30 January 2020, 11:21:26
If it was done properly, as Triumph was, then it could be a success, but it has always been a case of a bit of venture capitalist funding, couple with some wide boy management and a few well meaning enthusiasts trying to punch way above their weight.
They had some success with the rotary,s in the 80,s / 90,s but apart from that its been big press announcements with very little to back it up.


A 2500 cc triple holds a certain appeal
What? As a means of committing suicide?
Title: Re: Norton
Post by: Field Marshal Dr. Opti on 30 January 2020, 13:31:37
If it was done properly, as Triumph was, then it could be a success, but it has always been a case of a bit of venture capitalist funding, couple with some wide boy management and a few well meaning enthusiasts trying to punch way above their weight.
They had some success with the rotary,s in the 80,s / 90,s but apart from that its been big press announcements with very little to back it up.


A 2500 cc triple holds a certain appeal
What? As a means of committing suicide?

Just imagine the admiring glances from the 'senior ladies' when you turn up for your OAP lunch on one.
Title: Re: Norton
Post by: STEMO on 30 January 2020, 13:35:05
If it was done properly, as Triumph was, then it could be a success, but it has always been a case of a bit of venture capitalist funding, couple with some wide boy management and a few well meaning enthusiasts trying to punch way above their weight.
They had some success with the rotary,s in the 80,s / 90,s but apart from that its been big press announcements with very little to back it up.


A 2500 cc triple holds a certain appeal
What? As a means of committing suicide?

Just imagine the admiring glances from the 'senior ladies' when you turn up for your OAP lunch on one.
I would just collapse in a heap at the first set of lights. My feeble frame wouldn't be able to hold it up.  ;D
Title: Re: Norton
Post by: BazaJT on 31 January 2020, 08:27:46
Yes a pity they didn't/couldn't/wouldn't follow more the business model of Triumph who are now a highly respected brand doing well with their road bikes and in racing.I think their Rocket 3 is a 2300cc or started out as such?
Title: Re: Norton
Post by: Field Marshal Dr. Opti on 31 January 2020, 14:47:50
Yes a pity they didn't/couldn't/wouldn't follow more the business model of Triumph who are now a highly respected brand doing well with their road bikes and in racing.I think their Rocket 3 is a 2300cc or started out as such?

Yep....correct.

But later models now 2500cc. :y
Title: Re: Norton
Post by: Field Marshal Dr. Opti on 31 January 2020, 14:49:55
https://youtu.be/WOCBhjebuaY (https://youtu.be/WOCBhjebuaY)
Title: Re: Norton
Post by: Field Marshal Dr. Opti on 01 February 2020, 17:15:16
If it was done properly, as Triumph was, then it could be a success, but it has always been a case of a bit of venture capitalist funding, couple with some wide boy management and a few well meaning enthusiasts trying to punch way above their weight.
They had some success with the rotary,s in the 80,s / 90,s but apart from that its been big press announcements with very little to back it up.


A 2500 cc triple holds a certain appeal
What? As a means of committing suicide?

Just imagine the admiring glances from the 'senior ladies' when you turn up for your OAP lunch on one.
I would just collapse in a heap at the first set of lights. My feeble frame wouldn't be able to hold it up.  ;D

Just make a will before you ride/crash it. Leaving everything to your good friend Opti..... :y