Omega Owners Forum
Chat Area => General Discussion Area => Topic started by: Raeturbo on 15 April 2020, 15:57:09
-
Labours Lord Ahmed of Rotherham, What’s the bet he’ll get away with it.
-
No surprise considering the sex scandal in Rotherham .... >:( >:(
-
Bloody right! What the hell is going on there?
-
Cut his tackle off & make him eat it , dirty c**t.
-
Cut his tackle off & make him eat it , dirty c**t.
Nope, take him round the back and shoot him, then either cremate or dissolve him. No fuss, no attention, just done.
And for the record, that's not a question of being soft or compassionate, simply that there is absolutely nothing to be gained from doing anything else, regardless of deserving or not.
-
^^. Definitely ^^. About time this country started punishing this sort of scum, all this ‘pity for him crap’ is just encouraging the f&ckers to do these crimes. Plough them into the ground I say!
-
Imagine the uproar from the lefty guardian reading vegetable munchers if it had been a White Grooming gang, and brown girls. I bet it wouldn't have taken years to do something about it..
-
Feed him through a tree chipper.
-
These offences are from the 1970's. Two of the defendants are unfit to plead. How the f**k is anyone going to reach a verdict?
-
The more pain he goes through the better in my opinion , have had to deal with men like this and read about their crimes in detail.
-
These offences are from the 1970's. Two of the defendants are unfit to plead. How the f**k is anyone going to reach a verdict?
Soon reach a verdict if I was on the jury.
-
These offences are from the 1970's. Two of the defendants are unfit to plead. How the f**k is anyone going to reach a verdict?
Soon reach a verdict if I was on the jury.
I was on a Jury for a crime of a sexual nature, and we considered the evidence very carefully.
-
I would like to think that anyone on any jury would consider the evidence put to them very carefully ???
-
Ive been on juries for various serious offences. Of course you need to consider the evidence carefully, but use common sense to cut through the bullshit the lawyers spout to muddy the waters, cause confusion, and plead mitigation for hideous crimes.
Lawyers charge an arm and a leg for this stuff because they are usually very good at it. It makes sense to see through it and sift out the facts to reach a verdict.
My slightly glib point was made because this national scandal has been allowed to go on and been covered up, for left wing political reasons and that is utterly disgraceful, from any political leaning.
Many people - including quite a few in high places - should have spent long periods behind bars over this, but very few of them have.
Yet when Tom Watson (nonce finder General) made the most heinous and cruel allegations against public figures, who coincidentally weren't connected to the Labour party, the media hounded the people like animals, until it was found that none of them were guilty, and the accusations came from a crazy fantasist, who was actually a convicted Paedophile.
In earlier times Watson would have had to disappear from public life forever, but he has reinvented himself as a diet guru whose every word the media seem to hang on.
-
Ironic given his time at the trough...
-
I would like to think that anyone on any jury would consider the evidence put to them very carefully ???
Simples.. Muslin type peado,, Gulity as fook.. Hang him. Next case.
-
I would like to think that anyone on any jury would consider the evidence put to them very carefully ???
Simples.. Muslin type peado,, Gulity as fook.. Hang him. Next case.
You could make a veil with that material. ;)
-
I would like to think that anyone on any jury would consider the evidence put to them very carefully ???
Simples.. Muslin type peado,, Gulity as fook.. Hang him. Next case.
You could make a veil with that material. ;)
Unless you were in France, where they're banned. Muslims wearing Muslin is a no no. ;D
-
And quite rightly so
-
The Italians style it out, but the French do like to be, er, argumentative. Because they can... :D