Omega Owners Forum

Chat Area => General Discussion Area => Topic started by: Mr Skrunts on 01 July 2025, 11:43:15

Title: The Royal Train
Post by: Mr Skrunts on 01 July 2025, 11:43:15
So it's been on the news today that King Charles will be scrapping the Royal Train with in a couple of years.

£80k for the 2 trips made the last financial year and £400K in storage costs P.A. so yes I agree it certainly makes sense.

Google - The royal train will be taken around the UK before it is removed from service, after which it could be put on public display

But why not consider turning it into a new service equivalent to maybe the orient express. :y
Title: Re: The Royal Train
Post by: Field Marshal Dr. Opti on 01 July 2025, 12:09:28
There has been a royal train dating back to queen Vicky.
Title: Re: The Royal Train
Post by: Lizzie Zoom on 01 July 2025, 15:50:39
There has been a royal train dating back to queen Vicky.

Indeed, since the 13th June 1842 when Queen Victoria first travelled by train from Slough Railway Station to Paddington Terminus on the Great Western Railway.  As a railway historian, I have been fascinated by this story, as we know the Queen was suspicious, if not frightened, of this new mode of travel, but the lovely, very up to date, Prince Albert persuaded her to try it.  Once she had, she never stopped! ;D ;D ;D ;)

Anyone interested may be interested in reading this good resume:

https://the-history-girls.blogspot.com/2017/06/queen-victorias-first-railway-journey.html

and................

https://queenvictoriaroses.co.uk/2023/06/13/queen-victorias-first-train-ride-13th-june-1842/

 :y
Title: Re: The Royal Train
Post by: Doctor Gollum on 01 July 2025, 19:19:15
Prince Albert is known for being, er, open minded :D
Title: Re: The Royal Train
Post by: YZ250 on 01 July 2025, 20:44:20
Prince Albert is known for being, er, open minded :D

I’m rubbish at history, I’d always thought that a Prince Albert was a genital piercing. Every days a school day.   :o  :)
Title: Re: The Royal Train
Post by: Doctor Gollum on 02 July 2025, 00:03:09
Prince Albert is known for being, er, open minded :D

I’m rubbish at history, I’d always thought that a Prince Albert was a genital piercing. Every days a school day.   :o  :)
I was being witty... Prince Albert was husband to Queen Victoria before he became a fetish. ;)
Title: Re: The Royal Train
Post by: Field Marshal Dr. Opti on 02 July 2025, 11:19:18
Prince Albert is known for being, er, open minded :D

I’m rubbish at history, I’d always thought that a Prince Albert was a genital piercing. Every days a school day.   :o  :)

Rumour has it Albert the German sausage man was hung like a horse......which is why Victoria said "we are not amused" whenever he came near her. :)
Title: Re: The Royal Train
Post by: ronnyd on 02 July 2025, 11:50:03
She must have been quite amused, with all the sprogs they churned out.  :)
Title: Re: The Royal Train
Post by: Doctor Gollum on 02 July 2025, 12:10:37
She must have been quite amused, with all the sprogs they churned out.  :)
They were all Mr Browns'...
Title: Re: The Royal Train
Post by: TheBoy on 02 July 2025, 20:07:53
Even Charlie realises that trains are stupid Victorian technology, and should be resigned to history...
Title: Re: The Royal Train
Post by: Nick W on 02 July 2025, 22:14:07
Even Charlie realises that trains are stupid Victorian technology, and should be resigned to history...


Trains are still highly efficient ways of quickly moving lots of people in/out/between cities. They're nearly as good for moving heavy, bulky loads between fixed points - like fuel for power stations.


They're now utterly hopeless for the needs that private carriages used to serve well. The costs and use mentioned here make a good case for owning a luxury minibus, or the use of a first class compartment on a scheduled train.
Title: Re: The Royal Train
Post by: Marks DTM Calib on 03 July 2025, 07:56:55
Even the queen rarely used the royal train as she often travelled on standard services with a full carriage being booked out.

The royal train is of little use for anything other than what it was adapted to as it can accommodate very people.

I suspect one or two coaches may end up at the National Railway Museum (probably the two state coaches) and the rest will be scrapped......unless Jeremy Hoskins (owns LSL and has a hell of a heritage fleet) fancies a loco hauled private train to go with his converted 121 (55022) bubble car gin palace chairman's train

(https://live.staticflickr.com/65535/53480753279_ccc04e2530_b.jpg)
Title: Re: The Royal Train
Post by: Marks DTM Calib on 03 July 2025, 08:16:20
Here is the details of what actually makes up the royal train:

The Royal train coaches

HM The Queen's Saloon 2903 ex 11001 built as prototype HST First Open Rebuilt as 2903 for the Queens Silver jubilee in 1977

HRH The Duke Of Edinburgh's Saloon 2904 ex 12001 built as prototype HST Tourist Second Open Rebuilt as 2904 for the Queens Silver jubilee in 1977

Royal Household Sleeping Car 2915 MK 3A built to similar specification as sleeping cars 10647 -- 10729 in 1985

HRH The Prince Of Wales's Dining Car 2916 ex 40512 converted from HST TRUK in 1988

Royal Kitchen / Household Dining Car 2917 ex 40514 converted from HST TRUK in 1990

Royal Household Cars 2918 ex 40515 converted from HST TRUK in 1989

Royal Household Cars 2919 ex 40518 converted from HST TRUK in 1989

Royal Household Couchettes 2920 ex 14109 ex 17109 converted in 1989

Royal Household Couchettes 2921 ex 14107 ex 17107 converted in 1990

HRH The Prince of Wales's Sleeping Car 2922 built in 1987

Royal Saloon 2923 built 1987
Title: Re: The Royal Train
Post by: TheBoy on 03 July 2025, 08:57:23
Trains are still highly efficient ways of quickly moving lots of people in/out/between cities. They're nearly as good for moving heavy, bulky loads between fixed points - like fuel for power stations.
Which is why trains sort of almost work for the South East, assuming you want to go to London.

They really don't work anywhere else, and outside of London's Tube system, are not financially viable to users or the taxpayer.


The train companies often don't help, as parking at Chiltern stations is now a tenner a day, and Banbury station has closed it's drop off point to private vehicles, so anyone wanting to use the train from there now has to use a taxi if not in walking distance.  Fine for drop off is now £40.  So everyone drives to London now.
Title: Re: The Royal Train
Post by: Migv6 le Frog Fan on 03 July 2025, 09:54:43
In a perfect world, freight would travel by rail and trucks banished from the roads, other than smaller trucks to do local runs from train stations to delivery depots.
People who cant pass a test to prove they are capable of driving to a reasonably high standard forced to take trains and taxis because they are banned from the roads.
Then, nice clear roads with high standards of driving, and no motorway speed limits for the rest of us.
We can but dream.  :D
Title: Re: The Royal Train
Post by: Kevin Wood on 03 July 2025, 14:21:21
In a perfect world, freight would travel by rail and trucks banished from the roads, other than smaller trucks to do local runs from train stations to delivery depots.
People who cant pass a test to prove they are capable of driving to a reasonably high standard forced to take trains and taxis because they are banned from the roads.
Then, nice clear roads with high standards of driving, and no motorway speed limits for the rest of us.
We can but dream.  :D

Exactly what I experienced driving through Germany on Sunday, in fact.
Title: Re: The Royal Train
Post by: Varche on 03 July 2025, 14:55:38
Trains are still highly efficient ways of quickly moving lots of people in/out/between cities. They're nearly as good for moving heavy, bulky loads between fixed points - like fuel for power stations.
Which is why trains sort of almost work for the South East, assuming you want to go to London.

They really don't work anywhere else, and outside of London's Tube system, are not financially viable to users or the taxpayer.

That is madness. Society should be pushing for it to be easier to travel by train or indeed be easier to travel.

Drop off charges boil my P1ss. Years ago, my brother had to pay a couple of quid to pick me up at Leeds airport or £5 if he came in his van. He revolted and made me walk out of the airport. Of course now red lines everywhere. Contrast with Spain. Free to drop off at Malaga airport in short  stay if you take less than ten minutes. You can use the same to pick up if you wait off site and the person messages you.


The train companies often don't help, as parking at Chiltern stations is now a tenner a day, and Banbury station has closed it's drop off point to private vehicles, so anyone wanting to use the train from there now has to use a taxi if not in walking distance.  Fine for drop off is now £40.  So everyone drives to London now.
Title: Re: The Royal Train
Post by: Doctor Gollum on 04 July 2025, 12:30:01
Waiting off site simply moves the problem elsewhere. And if there's any housing in the vague vicinity that then gets lumped with parking restrictions at best and double red lines at worst.

The drop off/pick up charges are greedy, but by the same token the world is also full of selfish, entitled arseholes so the any free DOPU areas get abused by people too retarded to use the car parks.

It's unfortunately a world that we've created for ourselves.
Title: Re: The Royal Train
Post by: Sir Tigger KC on 04 July 2025, 18:08:30
The train companies often don't help, as parking at Chiltern stations is now a tenner a day, and Banbury station has closed it's drop off point to private vehicles, so anyone wanting to use the train from there now has to use a taxi if not in walking distance.  Fine for drop off is now £40.  So everyone drives to London now.

That's no way to run a railway!  ::)

Do the buses go to the station?  ???
Title: Re: The Royal Train
Post by: Migv6 le Frog Fan on 04 July 2025, 18:15:09
In a perfect world, freight would travel by rail and trucks banished from the roads, other than smaller trucks to do local runs from train stations to delivery depots.
People who cant pass a test to prove they are capable of driving to a reasonably high standard forced to take trains and taxis because they are banned from the roads.
Then, nice clear roads with high standards of driving, and no motorway speed limits for the rest of us.
We can but dream.  :D

Exactly what I experienced driving through Germany on Sunday, in fact.

And people tell us, we won the war.  ::) ;D
Title: Re: The Royal Train
Post by: TheBoy on 05 July 2025, 09:46:55
Do the buses go to the station?  ???
Nope.

Its pay a tenner to park, get a taxi, or shank's pony....
Title: Re: The Royal Train
Post by: Rangie on 05 July 2025, 16:45:53
In a perfect world, freight would travel by rail and trucks banished from the roads, other than smaller trucks to do local runs from train stations to delivery depots.
People who cant pass a test to prove they are capable of driving to a reasonably high standard forced to take trains and taxis because they are banned from the roads.
Then, nice clear roads with high standards of driving, and no motorway speed limits for the rest of us.
We can but dream.  :D

Exactly what I experienced driving through Germany on Sunday, in fact.

And people tell us, we won the war.  ::) ;D
.

Import the 3rd world & become the third world.
Title: Re: The Royal Train
Post by: Field Marshal Dr. Opti on 08 July 2025, 12:23:06
In a perfect world, freight would travel by rail and trucks banished from the roads, other than smaller trucks to do local runs from train stations to delivery depots.
People who cant pass a test to prove they are capable of driving to a reasonably high standard forced to take trains and taxis because they are banned from the roads.
Then, nice clear roads with high standards of driving, and no motorway speed limits for the rest of us.
We can but dream.  :D

Exactly what I experienced driving through Germany on Sunday, in fact.

And people tell us, we won the war.  ::) ;D
.

Import the 3rd world & become the third world.

We are constantly told by leftie lawyer types that diversity is our strength......although it is never explained how. :-\