Omega Owners Forum
Chat Area => General Discussion Area => Topic started by: Bandit127 on 03 October 2008, 19:37:36
-
It is a convenience often used.
-
It is a convenience often used.
By people who don't bother to trim the quoted article
-
It is a convenience often used.
By people who don't bother to trim the quoted article
to the important bit - the bit they are replyning to
-
It is a convenience often used.
By people who don't bother to trim the quoted article
to the important bit - the bit they are replyning to
It makes the meaning and impact of their reply diluted
-
It is a convenience often used.
By people who don't bother to trim the quoted article
to the important bit - the bit they are replyning to
It makes the meaning and impact of their reply diluted
And it's wearing my scroll wheel out, bypassing stuff I have already read twice
-
It is a convenience often used.
By people who don't bother to trim the quoted article
to the important bit - the bit they are replyning to
It makes the meaning and impact of their reply diluted
And it's wearing my scroll wheel out, bypassing stuff I have already read twice
And it's worn Skruntie's finger out. Allegedly that's what it was anyway.
-
It is a convenience often used.
By people who don't bother to trim the quoted article
to the important bit - the bit they are replyning to
It makes the meaning and impact of their reply diluted
And it's wearing my scroll wheel out, bypassing stuff I have already read twice
And it's worn Skruntie's finger out. Allegedly that's what it was anyway.
And it's bleedin' tedious.
-
It is a convenience often used.
By people who don't bother to trim the quoted article
to the important bit - the bit they are replyning to
It makes the meaning and impact of their reply diluted
And it's wearing my scroll wheel out, bypassing stuff I have already read twice
And it's worn Skruntie's finger out. Allegedly that's what it was anyway.
And it's bleedin' tedious.
True , my finger is getting worn out.
-
It is a convenience often used.
By people who don't bother to trim the quoted article
to the important bit - the bit they are replyning to
It makes the meaning and impact of their reply diluted
And it's wearing my scroll wheel out, bypassing stuff I have already read twice
And it's worn Skruntie's finger out. Allegedly that's what it was anyway.
And it's bleedin' tedious.
True , my finger is getting worn out.
But rather than getting the quote button deleted.
-
It is a convenience often used.
By people who don't bother to trim the quoted article
to the important bit - the bit they are replyning to
It makes the meaning and impact of their reply diluted
And it's wearing my scroll wheel out, bypassing stuff I have already read twice
And it's worn Skruntie's finger out. Allegedly that's what it was anyway.
And it's bleedin' tedious.
True , my finger is getting worn out.
But rather than getting the quote button deleted.
Could we not have the posts reversed.
-
It is a convenience often used.
By people who don't bother to trim the quoted article
to the important bit - the bit they are replyning to
It makes the meaning and impact of their reply diluted
And it's wearing my scroll wheel out, bypassing stuff I have already read twice
And it's worn Skruntie's finger out. Allegedly that's what it was anyway.
And it's bleedin' tedious.
True , my finger is getting worn out.
But rather than getting the quote button deleted.
Could we not have the posts reversed.
For example, could we have the last post at the top of the thread instead.
-
It is a convenience often used.
By people who don't bother to trim the quoted article
to the important bit - the bit they are replyning to
It makes the meaning and impact of their reply diluted
And it's wearing my scroll wheel out, bypassing stuff I have already read twice
And it's worn Skruntie's finger out. Allegedly that's what it was anyway.
And it's bleedin' tedious.
True , my finger is getting worn out.
But rather than getting the quote button deleted.
Could we not have the posts reversed.
For example, could we have the last post at the top of the thread instead.
Thankyou for listening. :y :y :y
-
Good suggestion Skruntie :y :y :y :y
It is a convenience often used.
By people who don't bother to trim the quoted article
to the important bit - the bit they are replyning to
It makes the meaning and impact of their reply diluted
And it's wearing my scroll wheel out, bypassing stuff I have already read twice
And it's worn Skruntie's finger out. Allegedly that's what it was anyway.
And it's bleedin' tedious.
True , my finger is getting worn out.
But rather than getting the quote button deleted.
Could we not have the posts reversed.
For example, could we have the last post at the top of the thread instead.
Thankyou for listening. :y :y :y
-
Good suggestion Skruntie :y :y :y :y
It is a convenience often used.
By people who don't bother to trim the quoted article
to the important bit - the bit they are replyning to
It makes the meaning and impact of their reply diluted
And it's wearing my scroll wheel out, bypassing stuff I have already read twice
And it's worn Skruntie's finger out. Allegedly that's what it was anyway.
And it's bleedin' tedious.
True , my finger is getting worn out.
But rather than getting the quote button deleted.
Could we not have the posts reversed.
For example, could we have the last post at the top of the thread instead.
Thankyou for listening. :y :y :y
jesus chaps just knackered me mouse :D :D
-
Good suggestion Skruntie :y :y :y :y
It is a convenience often used.
By people who don't bother to trim the quoted article
to the important bit - the bit they are replyning to
It makes the meaning and impact of their reply diluted
And it's wearing my scroll wheel out, bypassing stuff I have already read twice
And it's worn Skruntie's finger out. Allegedly that's what it was anyway.
And it's bleedin' tedious.
True , my finger is getting worn out.
But rather than getting the quote button deleted.
Could we not have the posts reversed.
For example, could we have the last post at the top of the thread instead.
Thankyou for listening. :y :y :y
jesus chaps just knackered me mouse :D :D
Much easier if you use a nipple instead of a mouse :y
-
Good suggestion Skruntie :y :y :y :y
It is a convenience often used.
By people who don't bother to trim the quoted article
to the important bit - the bit they are replyning to
It makes the meaning and impact of their reply diluted
And it's wearing my scroll wheel out, bypassing stuff I have already read twice
And it's worn Skruntie's finger out. Allegedly that's what it was anyway.
And it's bleedin' tedious.
True , my finger is getting worn out.
But rather than getting the quote button deleted.
Could we not have the posts reversed.
For example, could we have the last post at the top of the thread instead.
Thankyou for listening. :y :y :y
jesus chaps just knackered me mouse :D :D
Much easier if you use a nipple instead of a mouse :y
Good idea Jimbob. Do you recommend soft touch nipples or the hard ones. ::) :-X :y
-
Good suggestion Skruntie :y :y :y :y
It is a convenience often used.
By people who don't bother to trim the quoted article
to the important bit - the bit they are replyning to
It makes the meaning and impact of their reply diluted
And it's wearing my scroll wheel out, bypassing stuff I have already read twice
And it's worn Skruntie's finger out. Allegedly that's what it was anyway.
And it's bleedin' tedious.
True , my finger is getting worn out.
But rather than getting the quote button deleted.
Could we not have the posts reversed.
For example, could we have the last post at the top of the thread instead.
Thankyou for listening. :y :y :y
jesus chaps just knackered me mouse :D :D
Much easier if you use a nipple instead of a mouse :y
Good idea Jimbob. Do you recommend soft touch nipples or the hard ones. ::) :-X :y
hard ones every time ! :D
-
Good suggestion Skruntie :y :y :y :y
It is a convenience often used.
By people who don't bother to trim the quoted article
to the important bit - the bit they are replyning to
It makes the meaning and impact of their reply diluted
And it's wearing my scroll wheel out, bypassing stuff I have already read twice
And it's worn Skruntie's finger out. Allegedly that's what it was anyway.
And it's bleedin' tedious.
True , my finger is getting worn out.
But rather than getting the quote button deleted.
Could we not have the posts reversed.
For example, could we have the last post at the top of the thread instead.
Thankyou for listening. :y :y :y
jesus chaps just knackered me mouse :D :D
Much easier if you use a nipple instead of a mouse :y
Good idea Jimbob. Do you recommend soft touch nipples or the hard ones. ::) :-X :y
hard ones every time ! :D
Keep a fresh rubber on em to keep em nice and hard.
-
Good suggestion Skruntie :y :y :y :y
It is a convenience often used.
By people who don't bother to trim the quoted article
to the important bit - the bit they are replyning to
It makes the meaning and impact of their reply diluted
And it's wearing my scroll wheel out, bypassing stuff I have already read twice
And it's worn Skruntie's finger out. Allegedly that's what it was anyway.
And it's bleedin' tedious.
True , my finger is getting worn out.
But rather than getting the quote button deleted.
Could we not have the posts reversed.
For example, could we have the last post at the top of the thread instead.
Thankyou for listening. :y :y :y
jesus chaps just knackered me mouse :D :D
Much easier if you use a nipple instead of a mouse :y
Good idea Jimbob. Do you recommend soft touch nipples or the hard ones. ::) :-X :y
hard ones every time ! :D
Keep a fresh rubber on em to keep em nice and hard.
;D ;D ;D ;)
-
It is a convenience often used.
By people who don't bother to trim the quoted article
to the important bit - the bit they are replyning to
It makes the meaning and impact of their reply diluted
And it's wearing my scroll wheel out, bypassing stuff I have already read twice
And it's worn Skruntie's finger out. Allegedly that's what it was anyway.
And it's bleedin' tedious.
True , my finger is getting worn out.
But rather than getting the quote button deleted.
Could we not have the posts reversed.
For example, could we have the last post at the top of the thread instead.
programmatically not easy :-/
-
It is a convenience often used.
By people who don't bother to trim the quoted article
to the important bit - the bit they are replyning to
It makes the meaning and impact of their reply diluted
And it's wearing my scroll wheel out, bypassing stuff I have already read twice
And it's worn Skruntie's finger out. Allegedly that's what it was anyway.
And it's bleedin' tedious.
True , my finger is getting worn out.
But rather than getting the quote button deleted.
Could we not have the posts reversed.
For example, could we have the last post at the top of the thread instead.
programmatically not easy :-/
why not simply copy paste the last line ;D
-
It is a convenience often used.
By people who don't bother to trim the quoted article
to the important bit - the bit they are replyning to
It makes the meaning and impact of their reply diluted
And it's wearing my scroll wheel out, bypassing stuff I have already read twice
And it's worn Skruntie's finger out. Allegedly that's what it was anyway.
And it's bleedin' tedious.
True , my finger is getting worn out.
But rather than getting the quote button deleted.
Could we not have the posts reversed.
For example, could we have the last post at the top of the thread instead.
programmatically not easy :-/
why not simply copy paste the last line ;D
Whats the record amount of quotes on one post?
-
It is a convenience often used.
By people who don't bother to trim the quoted article
to the important bit - the bit they are replyning to
It makes the meaning and impact of their reply diluted
And it's wearing my scroll wheel out, bypassing stuff I have already read twice
And it's worn Skruntie's finger out. Allegedly that's what it was anyway.
And it's bleedin' tedious.
True , my finger is getting worn out.
But rather than getting the quote button deleted.
Could we not have the posts reversed.
For example, could we have the last post at the top of the thread instead.
programmatically not easy :-/
why not simply copy paste the last line ;D
Whats the record amount of quotes on one post?
many but actually not all the lines required I think..