yes but the law actually states that if my record is clear and ts afirst offence then i must be warned firstNot convinced that is the case...
thats what im saying
yes but the law actually states that if my record is clear and ts afirst offence then i must be warned firstIf the NIP (Notice of Intended Prosecution) is served on you, the registered owner of the vehicle within 14 days - check the pepipoo site for more exact info - then that is your 'warning', irrespective of your first or hundred and first offence...
thats what im saying
yes but the law actually states that if my record is clear and ts afirst offence then i must be warned first
thats what im saying
the law actually states that if my record is clear and ts afirst offence then i must be warned first
yes but the law actually states that if my record is clear and ts afirst offence then i must be warned first
thats what im saying
The warning the OP is looking for is probably along the lines of (in Scotland, anyway)....
"I must warn you that the circumstances surrounding your speed will be reported to the Procurator Fiscal at somewhere in Scotland for their consideration of a prosecution in terms of section 87(1) of the Road Traffic Regulation Act 1984 in that you drove xzxzx motorcar on xzxzxz at a speed of xzxz mph which is a 30 mph speed restricted road. I must caution you that you are not obliged to say anything but anything you say will be noted and may be used in evidence. Do you understand?? "
ps - we dont have PACE up here nor do we use the new fangled caution thats in Englandshire....
Chaps getting confuddled..... ;)
Being totally honest about it, how many of you would if there was a loophole try and get out of the fine and points. I for one would
Did that letter work about the disabled parking Mr Loo Knee :DQuoteBeing totally honest about it, how many of you would if there was a loophole try and get out of the fine and points. I for one would
[size=18]Cheap skate, cheap skate, cheap skate, cheap skate ;D ;D ;D[/b][/color][/size]
QuoteDid that letter work about the disabled parking Mr Loo Knee :DQuoteBeing totally honest about it, how many of you would if there was a loophole try and get out of the fine and points. I for one would
[size=18]Cheap skate, cheap skate, cheap skate, cheap skate ;D ;D ;D[/b][/color][/size]
;D ;DQuoteQuoteDid that letter work about the disabled parking Mr Loo Knee :DQuoteBeing totally honest about it, how many of you would if there was a loophole try and get out of the fine and points. I for one would
[size=18]Cheap skate, cheap skate, cheap skate, cheap skate ;D ;D ;D[/b][/color][/size]
What letter never sent a letter :P :P :P :P
Being totally honest about it, how many of you would if there was a loophole try and get out of the fine and points. I for one would
well tbh he would of got that fine anyway as he was double the speed limit and that is 6 points and in some cases a banIf the NIP wasn't posted in time to reach the owner (as known by dvla) within 14 (working?) days, then there is a loophole you may use
at end of the day i was doing 35 in a 30 that i was sure was a 40 but i was wrong and yes i will try to get out of it because i put enough money into the governments xmas party fund as it lol
and no the letter was served after 14 days
well tbh he would of got that fine anyway as he was double the speed limit and that is 6 points and in some cases a ban
at end of the day i was doing 35 in a 30 that i was sure was a 40 but i was wrong and yes i will try to get out of it because i put enough money into the governments xmas party fund as it lol
and no the letter was served after 14 days
Take it on the chin ;)
Yeah Freddie mercury did just that (often im told) and look what happened too that poor sod. ;D
Quote
Yeah Freddie mercury did just that (often im told) and look what happened too that poor sod. ;D
I give up with you Stu ;D ;D