Omega Owners Forum

Chat Area => General Discussion Area => Topic started by: STMO123 on 27 January 2007, 18:16:37

Title: Volvo C70
Post by: STMO123 on 27 January 2007, 18:16:37
I really like the look of this, but was surprised to find it was overpriced according to Parkers :o

http://www.specialistcars.net/newspecialistcars/carpages/51.html
Title: Re: Volvo C70
Post by: tunnie on 27 January 2007, 18:21:29
2.3 T5 that would shift!!

Does seam high for a 1998 R, remember an Omega from that year is around 1k... and the 3.0 would be just as fast
Title: Re: Volvo C70
Post by: STMO123 on 27 January 2007, 18:24:40
Quote
2.3 T5 that would shift!!

Does seam high for a 1998 R, remember an Omega from that year is around 1k... and the 3.0 would be just as fast


No mate. 0-60 in 6.8 secs ;)
Title: Re: Volvo C70
Post by: Elite Pete on 27 January 2007, 18:27:45
That reminds me, I must bin the left over Quality Street that have been sitting around since Christmas ;)
Title: Re: Volvo C70
Post by: STMO123 on 27 January 2007, 18:29:38
Quote
That reminds me, I must bin the left over Quality Street that have been sitting around since Christmas ;)

I actually LIKE the colour, and dont bin your tin, it will do to keep my screws in ;D
Title: Re: Volvo C70
Post by: MikeDundee on 27 January 2007, 18:32:17
Quote
Quote
That reminds me, I must bin the left over Quality Street that have been sitting around since Christmas ;)

I actually LIKE the colour, and dont bin your tin, it will do to keep my screws in ;D

Probabaly a box, but don't worry I have a big tin from chrimbo, around somewhere :y
Title: Re: Volvo C70
Post by: tunnie on 27 January 2007, 18:34:49
Quote
Quote
2.3 T5 that would shift!!

Does seam high for a 1998 R, remember an Omega from that year is around 1k... and the 3.0 would be just as fast


No mate. 0-60 in 6.8 secs ;)

Blimey that is quick...
Title: Re: Volvo C70
Post by: Admin on 27 January 2007, 18:53:21
T5 is a LOT faster than a 3.0 Omega! :)

My Carlsson allegedly had the same power output (somehow I think it was more) but it was so much faster than a 3.0, even a manual one.

It's not the 0-60 that is impressive, it is the acceleration in gear that really gets you! :D

But at 5k?? No chance. I would have said 3k for the coupe and 2.5k for the saloon.
Title: Re: Volvo C70
Post by: STMO123 on 27 January 2007, 19:00:56
Quote
T5 is a LOT faster than a 3.0 Omega! :)

My Carlsson allegedly had the same power output (somehow I think it was more) but it was so much faster than a 3.0, even a manual one.

It's not the 0-60 that is impressive, it is the acceleration in gear that really gets you! :D

But at 5k?? No chance. I would have said 3k for the coupe and 2.5k for the saloon.

Yep. Just had a look in the 'trader and they start around £3k for autos. Like the big meegas, I'd prefer manual. (Head down)
Title: Re: Volvo C70
Post by: Admin on 27 January 2007, 19:05:49
Agree 100% ;)
Title: Re: Volvo C70
Post by: Paul M on 27 January 2007, 19:52:48
Agree, that would destroy even a 3.0 manual Omega. I really don't find the MV6 that fast, compared to the 1.8 Focuses and the like that clutter our road yes, but there are loads of faster motors out there. It will be easy to remap for lots more power too, being that it's turbocharged.

I also agree that it's overpriced, it does look in good condition but it's 9 years old and that colour will do nothing for resale value. Nice car but it's well over double what I paid for my dual-fuel MV6 of the same age! I also suspect it's front wheel drive (or at best a crappy Haldex wannabe AWD system), which is a BIG negative for me in a car of that size with that much power.
Title: Re: Volvo C70
Post by: STMO123 on 27 January 2007, 20:02:00
Quote
Agree, that would destroy even a 3.0 manual Omega. I really don't find the MV6 that fast, compared to the 1.8 Focuses and the like that clutter our road yes, but there are loads of faster motors out there. It will be easy to remap for lots more power too, being that it's turbocharged.

I also agree that it's overpriced, it does look in good condition but it's 9 years old and that colour will do nothing for resale value. Nice car but it's well over double what I paid for my dual-fuel MV6 of the same age! I also suspect it's front wheel drive (or at best a crappy Haldex wannabe AWD system), which is a BIG negative for me in a car of that size with that much power.

Says in the parkers review that the engine is too powerful for the car.......but still fun :y
Title: Re: Volvo C70
Post by: Chopsdad on 27 January 2007, 20:44:55
For an R reg motor it's in great shape - future classic status must be pushing up the asking price  ;)
Title: Re: Volvo C70
Post by: STMO123 on 27 January 2007, 20:51:42
Quote
For an R reg motor it's in great shape - future classic status must be pushing up the asking price  ;)

I really do like that model. I also like omegas, obviously, saab 9000/9-5, honda legend and not much else

MUST be getting on :(
Title: Re: Volvo C70
Post by: tunnie on 27 January 2007, 21:36:58
Quote
Agree, that would destroy even a 3.0 manual Omega. I really don't find the MV6 that fast, compared to the 1.8 Focuses and the like that clutter our road yes, but there are loads of faster motors out there. It will be easy to remap for lots more power too, being that it's turbocharged.

I also agree that it's overpriced, it does look in good condition but it's 9 years old and that colour will do nothing for resale value. Nice car but it's well over double what I paid for my dual-fuel MV6 of the same age! I also suspect it's front wheel drive (or at best a crappy Haldex wannabe AWD system), which is a BIG negative for me in a car of that size with that much power.

2.5k for your MV6? Impressive!

One thing which is a big plus with big Vauxhall's = RWD!  :D
Title: Re: Volvo C70
Post by: Paul M on 28 January 2007, 15:13:45
Quote
2.5k for your MV6? Impressive!

One thing which is a big plus with big Vauxhall's = RWD!  :D

It was less than that, I can't remember how much exactly as it was over a year ago now (around 2k, possibly slightly less), but yeah I think it was a very good price considering it ticked all the boxes I was looking for -- 3.0 manual retail version MV6 with a proper SGI dual-fuel conversion. The car was damn near immaculate when I bought it, minor exceptions being the broken glovebox handle (fixed myself for free), some minor rust on the bottom of the doors and tatty wheels, both of which are common on Omegas and I will sort eventually. Considering the dual-fuel installation was £1800 and it just had £8-900 worth of servicing and repairs done in the year prior to me buying it, I think I got a good deal :y.

When you consider a car like this costs around 15p/mile in petrol at 27 MPG and having a dual-fuel car roughly halves that if you run on propane all the time, it can potentially save you £2000 -- the cost of the car disregarding servicing/repairs --in under 27,000 miles. Makes it easy to understand why I have the Omega as a second car even though it's not exactly economical per-se :)
Title: Re: Volvo C70
Post by: Markie on 28 January 2007, 15:38:20
'tis a nice car, and yes quick but as said overpriced and i wonder what mileage it has  :'(
Title: Re: Volvo C70
Post by: Markie on 28 January 2007, 15:40:28
oh and for an accurate price check this out.....same model year and colour....

http://cgi.ebay.co.uk/VOLVO-C70-T5-GT_W0QQitemZ270080738444QQihZ017QQcategoryZ9872QQrdZ1QQcmdZViewItem
Title: Re: Volvo C70
Post by: Del Boy on 28 January 2007, 18:22:20
Nice car used to have a 2.3 T-5 V70 on a W plate did shift but meega is just as fast if not faster
Title: Re: Volvo C70
Post by: STMO123 on 28 January 2007, 18:34:27
Quote
Nice car used to have a 2.3 T-5 V70 on a W plate did shift but meega is just as fast if not faster

2.3 T5 5d  2319cc / 5cyl   250bhp 155mph   0-60 6.9s   mpg30   ins grp16 ;D

Nope!  
 
  
Title: Re: Volvo C70
Post by: Del Boy on 28 January 2007, 18:48:35
Quote
Quote
Nice car used to have a 2.3 T-5 V70 on a W plate did shift but meega is just as fast if not faster

2.3 T5 5d  2319cc / 5cyl   250bhp 155mph   0-60 6.9s   mpg30   ins grp16 ;D

Nope!  
 
  

Ok then no all  ;)
Title: Re: Volvo C70
Post by: STMO123 on 28 January 2007, 18:51:37
Quote
Quote
Quote
Nice car used to have a 2.3 T-5 V70 on a W plate did shift but meega is just as fast if not faster

2.3 T5 5d  2319cc / 5cyl   250bhp 155mph   0-60 6.9s   mpg30   ins grp16 ;D

Nope!  
 
  

Ok then no all  ;)

Omegas are not fast Liam. Unless in police guise :y
Title: Re: Volvo C70
Post by: Del Boy on 28 January 2007, 18:54:16
Quote
Quote
Quote
Quote
Nice car used to have a 2.3 T-5 V70 on a W plate did shift but meega is just as fast if not faster

2.3 T5 5d  2319cc / 5cyl   250bhp 155mph   0-60 6.9s   mpg30   ins grp16 ;D

Nope!  
 
  

Ok then no all  ;)

Omegas are not fast Liam. Unless in police guise :y

I'm ok then ;) volvo was police as well just had to get rid of it had 180,000 on the clock