Omega Owners Forum

Chat Area => General Discussion Area => Topic started by: Debs. on 03 April 2009, 11:34:38

Title: BBC: Brand/Ross fine
Post by: Debs. on 03 April 2009, 11:34:38

The BBC have been fined £150,000 for the Brand/Ross debacle.

.......what`s the use of that, eh?....for, it`s "OUR" money being paid out! >:(

Title: Re: BBC: Brand/Ross fine
Post by: AndyVXR300 on 03 April 2009, 11:39:40

Quote

The BBC have been fined £150,000 for the Brand/Ross debacle.

.......what`s the use of that, eh?....for, it`s "OUR" money being paid out! >:(

Your so right too  >:(

Title: Re: BBC: Brand/Ross fine
Post by: Martin_1962 on 03 April 2009, 12:23:42

Quote

The BBC have been fined £150,000 for the Brand/Ross debacle.

.......what`s the use of that, eh?....for, it`s "OUR" money being paid out! >:(

Totally and utterly pointless

I want my money back >:( >:(

I really gave the water OF thingy some stick when they fined Severn Trent - I asked them for my share - I actually worked out how much ofthingy owed me - they really hated that.

1) How many licence payers are there?

2) Who has received OUR money?

Title: Re: BBC: Brand/Ross fine
Post by: Martin_1962 on 03 April 2009, 12:26:54

Roughly 20million licences

About 1p per viewer >:(

Title: Re: BBC: Brand/Ross fine
Post by: Debs. on 03 April 2009, 12:31:57

.......why can`t the persons that actually caused the offense be the ones whom have to pay the fine from their own vastly inflated generous personal remunerations.

Oh!.....then again, that`s our money too! >:(

Title: Re: BBC: Brand/Ross fine
Post by: Martin_1962 on 03 April 2009, 12:35:18

I just emailed graham.howell@ofcom.org.uk to ask how we get our money back!

Title: Re: BBC: Brand/Ross fine
Post by: Richie London on 03 April 2009, 13:03:27

Quote

.......why can`t the persons that actually caused the offense be the ones whom have to pay the fine from their own vastly inflated generous personal remunerations.

Oh!.....then again, that`s our money too! >:(

exactly. the fine should be passed down to them to pay. bet there both having a good laugh about it. tossers

Title: Re: BBC: Brand/Ross fine
Post by: dbug on 03 April 2009, 16:18:09

Quote

Quote

.......why can`t the persons that actually caused the offense be the ones whom have to pay the fine from their own vastly inflated generous personal remunerations.

Oh!.....then again, that`s our money too! >:(

exactly. the fine should be passed down to them to pay. bet there both having a good laugh about it. tossers

BBC should sue both the b*ggers to get it back (providing there are no costs involved or we'll be paying them as well!!) :y

Title: Re: BBC: Brand/Ross fine
Post by: Lizzie_Zoom on 03 April 2009, 16:22:38

Quote

.......why can`t the persons that actually caused the offense be the ones whom have to pay the fine from their own vastly inflated generous personal remunerations.

Oh!.....then again, that`s our money too! >:(

Yes Debs, which ever way you cut it we, the public, end up paying for originally being thrown rubbish television that upset the public..... :-? :-? :-? :-? :-? :-?

There is no justice in this crazy world. >:(

Title: Re: BBC: Brand/Ross fine
Post by: miggcddave on 03 April 2009, 16:56:33

i hate brand and woss they should pay the fine  >:( they have enough of our money any way . insulting pair of tossers :y

Title: Re: BBC: Brand/Ross fine
Post by: SJKOO01 on 03 April 2009, 18:04:21

Come on guys (and girls), you should of guessed that we were the ones going to pay for it one way or another !.

BBC = Bunch of Bl**dy Criminals !!!!!!!!!.

Not unlike the medical profession, or politicians, for when it goes fine they want the glory, but when it doesn't they pass if off as if its something trivial that we shouldn't worry about.

What's the betting what with the Credit crunch, and such other fines that the license goes up again soon !!!!.

Nuff said !.

M