Omega Owners Forum

Chat Area => General Discussion Area => Topic started by: Richie London on 05 April 2009, 19:47:31

Title: ross and brand dont have to pay the fine
Post by: Richie London on 05 April 2009, 19:47:31
looks like they have got away with it and we have to foot there bill

http://uk.news.yahoo.com/4/20090405/tuk-ofcom-unable-to-fine-ross-and-brand-dba1618.html

Title: Re: ross and brand dont have to pay the fine
Post by: Turk on 06 April 2009, 00:03:00
I wonder if the audience will still laugh and applaud Wossy's desperate attempts to be witty and clever, seeing as they are tax payers and are paying for his lack of talent.  
Title: Re: ross and brand dont have to pay the fine
Post by: Allenm on 06 April 2009, 09:13:09
Of course the BBC could always pay the fine out of the estimated £1.5M Ross wasn't paid while he was suspended.

Don't think he exactly got away with it!
Title: Re: ross and brand dont have to pay the fine
Post by: Richie London on 06 April 2009, 09:25:49
they got suspended because of there actions. but did the bbc know they was going to be fined as well, otherwise they could of said were also fining you an extra 75k each to cover the fine that will be imposed on us in april. so they havent paid for it have they really.
same as george michael found slumped over his wheel out of his head how many times on drugs, he hasnt been forced to go to rehab or lost his licence for being in charge of a vehicle while on drugs.

celebrities seem to do and say as they please and a front page story is usually forgotten by the end of the week. they dont give a toss
Title: Re: ross and brand dont have to pay the fine
Post by: TheBoy on 06 April 2009, 09:25:55
To be honest, who cares?
Title: Re: ross and brand dont have to pay the fine
Post by: Allenm on 06 April 2009, 12:33:24
Quote
they got suspended because of there actions. but did the bbc know they was going to be fined as well, otherwise they could of said were also fining you an extra 75k each to cover the fine that will be imposed on us in april. so they havent paid for it have they really.
same as george michael found slumped over his wheel out of his head how many times on drugs, he hasnt been forced to go to rehab or lost his licence for being in charge of a vehicle while on drugs.

celebrities seem to do and say as they please and a front page story is usually forgotten by the end of the week. they dont give a toss

But they didn't broadcast it - the BBC did!  They got suspended for acting inappropriately, but it was the BBC who took the editorial decision to go on a broadcast it and therefore the BBC who should take the rap for it going out to the public.  It was not live remember, someone edited it and deemed it fit for broadcast - and it was not JR / RB.
Title: Re: ross and brand dont have to pay the fine
Post by: dbug on 06 April 2009, 17:23:34
Quote
To be honest, who cares?

No one they're t*ssers