Omega Owners Forum

Chat Area => General Discussion Area => Topic started by: unlucky mark mv6 on 27 May 2009, 14:33:50

Title: swap.
Post by: unlucky mark mv6 on 27 May 2009, 14:33:50
Anyone interested in a possible swap with mine,need a manual to lower fuel consumption,either 3.0 or 3.2.Mine is mv6 auto on an o2 plate in silver. :y
Title: Re: swap.
Post by: unlucky mark mv6 on 27 May 2009, 14:37:56
Must be facelift though.
Title: Re: swap.
Post by: webby23 on 27 May 2009, 14:38:02
Dont think that theres much of a difference really between manual and auto, maybe 8% at best........

If you want to save fuel costs, get a 4 pot or a Prius mate

 :y
Title: Re: swap.
Post by: unlucky mark mv6 on 27 May 2009, 14:39:28
Been told i will probably save upto 20% on fuel. :y
Title: Re: swap.
Post by: webby23 on 27 May 2009, 14:52:11
Sounds a bit optimistic.

Have the later Omega sales brochure at home so can post up official figures when I get back from work tonight if you like

 :y :y
Title: Re: swap.
Post by: cem_devecioglu on 27 May 2009, 14:59:12
in a crowded start stop traffic manuals not easy but will differ more than 8 %..

today in lunch time go for shopping with a friends  1.6 toyota (auto) ..consumption was nearly same my omega  :-?  ;D

really surprised..and the autobox was very late to change gears..think have problem with software or gear ratios.. :-/
Title: Re: swap.
Post by: Lazydocker on 27 May 2009, 15:25:18
Quote
Anyone interested in a possible swap with mine,need a manual to lower fuel consumption,either 3.0 or 3.2.Mine is mv6 auto on an o2 plate in silver. :y

I've got an LPG converted mini-facelift... Fuel economy is great when compared pricewise ::) ::) ::)
Title: Re: swap.
Post by: nick v6 on 27 May 2009, 15:28:27
what about swopping it with ann's honda civic 1.6
 ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D
Title: Re: swap.
Post by: ScottieMV6 on 27 May 2009, 15:35:39
Can't be as bad as my partners 1.6 auto mazda 3. She get 25 mpg avg. out of it. My 3.0 MV6 does better than that.!!  :o :o
Title: Re: swap.
Post by: webby23 on 27 May 2009, 20:04:12
Just for reference, I have checked the 2001 Omega sales brochure I have here and 3.2s are only listed in Auto.......

But as an indicator the 2.6 manuals are only around 2-4mpg better than the 2.6 autos........

 :y
Title: Re: swap.
Post by: cem_devecioglu on 27 May 2009, 20:11:20
Quote
Can't be as bad as my partners 1.6 auto mazda 3. She get 25 mpg avg. out of it. My 3.0 MV6 does better than that.!!  :o :o

yep.. from comparing consumption figures with friends cars the main factors are car weight, gear ratios and driving style.. otherwise roughly a 3 liter engine must consume twice the 1.6 litre engine.. but thats very far from truth.. ( although they have this capability when hammered ;D)