Omega Owners Forum
Chat Area => General Discussion Area => Topic started by: cam2502 on 31 May 2009, 21:57:28
-
Saw one of these today,1st time in ages. Was a 3.5 in really good condition. Deep red colour. I know its a rover but i really liked these cars.
-
Yep me too.
Great Buick engine, great bodyshell shape (for the time), dire brakes and terminal rust though.
Still think they are a great looking car.
-
I had 2, both were good a 2.5 and a 3.5 god did that fly loved the pair of em'.
Crap handling though.
-
I had many many SD1's. Very under rated cars. Yes i know, prone to rust, but what from the 70's & eighties wasn't :-/ :-?
I'd love another, but it would have to be a V8s 8-) 8-) 8-) 8-) 8-) :)
-
I had 2, both were good a 2.5 and a 3.5 god did that fly loved the pair of em'.
Crap handling though.
2.3/2.6 ;)
-
Always wanted a twin plenum Vitesse. closest I got was a 3500SE
-
I had 2, both were good a 2.5 and a 3.5 god did that fly loved the pair of em'.
Crap handling though.
2.3/2.6 ;)
2.6 thats the one.
-
Always wanted a twin plenum Vitesse. closest I got was a 3500SE
I had an SE Auto. Moonraker Blue with grey leather.
-
just checked ebay to see how many were for sale. theres only 2, one is from a garage,selling at ......£1995!!!!!! and the other is a private sale,10 bids at the moment and its at £809!!!
-
Always wanted a twin plenum Vitesse. closest I got was a 3500SE
I had an SE Auto. Moonraker Blue with grey leather.
The best colour! :y
-
Saw one of these today,1st time in ages. Was a 3.5 in really good condition. Deep red colour. I know its a rover but i really liked these cars.
There were a few at Tatton today. There was even a drop head 2 door :o It had some kind of tubular T bar roof and looked to have had the wheel base shortened somewhere behind the doors. :-? :-?
-
I had many many SD1's. Very under rated cars. Yes i know, prone to rust, but what from the 70's & eighties wasn't :-/ :-?
I'd love another, but it would have to be a V8s 8-) 8-) 8-) 8-) 8-) :)
They were indeed Pete, they were much loved in the Met. I always fancied the Vanden Plas in that lovely dark red colour - and that engine - MMmmmmmm :y :y
-
Yep me too.
Great Buick engine, great bodyshell shape (for the time), dire brakes and terminal rust though.
Still think they are a great looking car.
Loosely based on the Ferrari Daytona ;)
-
.....
Loosely based on the Ferrari Daytona ;)
The front indicators were .... can't say for the rest! ;) ;) ;D
-
Yep me too.
Great Buick engine, great bodyshell shape (for the time), dire brakes and terminal rust though.
Still think they are a great looking car.
Loosely based on the Ferrari Daytona ;)
Yep you're right enough there Pete and with the hatchback, a practical design.
Come to think of it, a lot of British engineered cars of that general era were well conceived, generally. Had the build quality been better and the manufacturing ethic more realistically applied, then perhaps some of those great names would have survived. :y
-
2.4 was the best
-
Yep me too.
Great Buick engine, great bodyshell shape (for the time), dire brakes and terminal rust though.
Still think they are a great looking car.
:o Well I did not know that !
-
The V8 was better suited to the P6B though, and a couple of those.................. :y :y :y
-
Yep me too.
Great Buick engine, great bodyshell shape (for the time), dire brakes and terminal rust though.
Still think they are a great looking car.
:o Well I did not know that !
I thought everyone knew why there was a B in a P5B (coupe) ;) ;) :y :y :y
-
I had an S reg 3500 manual in gold. It was ok but nowhere near as fast as a P6 3500S that I had before it. With hindsight I should have kept them both-especilly the P6.
Steve
-
....
With hindsight I should have kept .....
my Senator! ::) ::) :y :y
-
Yep me too.
Great Buick engine, great bodyshell shape (for the time), dire brakes and terminal rust though.
Still think they are a great looking car.
A buick engine which Rover screwed the head design up on (poorer flow and never fixed), weakened the block (addressed on the SD1 variants), and designed in a fundamental weakness to ensure the headgaskets fails (extra row of bolts, fixed in 1990!)
Shame....its a very over rated lump which could have been so much better.