Omega Owners Forum

Chat Area => General Discussion Area => Topic started by: Nickbat on 02 November 2009, 00:47:29

Title: Is Cameron's guarantee worthless?
Post by: Nickbat on 02 November 2009, 00:47:29
September 2007:
Today, I will give this cast-iron guarantee: If I become PM a Conservative government will hold a referendum on any EU treaty that emerges from these negotiations.  No treaty should be ratified without consulting the British people in a referendum.

The word on the streets is that he will not now propose to hold a referendum. If he doesn't, he can say goodbye to my vote.  >:(

What happened to that old maxim:"My word is my bond"?

On the same subject, this is an interesting clip with Farage and Hannan:

[media]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P7-SituQpV0&feature=player_embedded[/media]

Title: Re: Is Cameron's guarantee worthless?
Post by: mantahatch on 02 November 2009, 08:06:51
I would imagine the treaty will be ratified before the election. This will leave him with no point in holding a referendum.
The present government is doing it's best to wreck everything for the next government.

We are facing massive tax rises from next summer from whoever gets in power.
Cameron can say he will give us a referendum but I think it will be to late.

Title: Re: Is Cameron's guarantee worthless?
Post by: Kevin Wood on 02 November 2009, 09:43:22
Promising one thing to get a headline and then backtracking when he thinks the public have forgotten?

That's exactly what we've got with the current government! I don't think the electorate will stand for another 4+ years of that.

What we desperately need is a leader who knows what he can reasonably achieve, makes attainable promises and stands by them.

So, he won't be getting my vote either - not that he had come close to earning it.

Kevin
Title: Re: Is Cameron's guarantee worthless?
Post by: mantahatch on 02 November 2009, 09:50:54
Quote
Promising one thing to get a headline and then backtracking when he thinks the public have forgotten?

That's exactly what we've got with the current government! I don't think the electorate will stand for another 4+ years of that.

What we desperately need is a leader who knows what he can reasonably achieve, makes attainable promises and stands by them.

So, he won't be getting my vote either - not that he had come close to earning it.



Kevin


Tsk tsk Kevin, how can you live in such a nice area in the Hampshire countryside and not be a tory  ;D ;D ;D
Title: Re: Is Cameron's guarantee worthless?
Post by: Dishevelled Den on 02 November 2009, 10:14:53
I'm concerned that many on the Tory front bench are beginning to show the early signs of impotence over this Treaty ratification.

Whilst the Lisbon Accord will be slavishly agreed to by the cowardly and incompetent government we now have in power, before any general election here, it seems that the Tories will submit to the inevitable.

The damage will then be done and short of a fundamental disconnect with Brussels, the done deal will remain unchallenged.

David Cameron may well have committed the cardinal error of having talked the talk he will be unable to walk the walk.

WHERE HAVE ALL THE POLITICIANS WITH BALLS, CONVICTION AND CONCERN FOR THIS NATION GONE?

THERE'S TOO MANY GUTLESS BASTARDS IN PUBLIC OFFICE FOR MY LIKING!
Title: Re: Is Cameron's guarantee worthless?
Post by: Varche on 02 November 2009, 13:15:27
Q. How can you tell if a politician is lying?

A. Their lips are moving.
Title: Re: Is Cameron's guarantee worthless?
Post by: Field Marshal Dr. Opti on 02 November 2009, 14:58:28
Quote
September 2007:
Today, I will give this cast-iron guarantee: If I become PM a Conservative government will hold a referendum on any EU treaty that emerges from these negotiations.  No treaty should be ratified without consulting the British people in a referendum.

The word on the streets is that he will not now propose to hold a referendum. If he doesn't, he can say goodbye to my vote.  >:(

What happened to that old maxim:"My word is my bond"?

On the same subject, this is an interesting clip with Farage and Hannan:

[media]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P7-SituQpV0&feature=player_embedded[/media]



I thought that you had already decided to vote for "The Little Englander Party"....Nickbat. ::) ::) ::) :D ;)
I might vote for David Cameron though.... ::) ::) ;)
Title: Re: Is Cameron's guarantee worthless?
Post by: albitz on 02 November 2009, 23:09:48
A boy doing a mans job. :(
Title: Re: Is Cameron's guarantee worthless?
Post by: albitz on 03 November 2009, 19:51:26
Quote
September 2007:
]Today,will give this cast-iron guarantee: If I become PM a Conservative government will hold ]a referendum on any EU treaty that emerges from these negotiations.  No treaty should be ratified without consulting the British people in a referendum.The word on the [/highlight][/highlight]streets is that he will not now propose to hold a referendum. If he doesn't, he can say goodbye to my vote.  >:(

What happened to that old maxim:"My word is my bond"?

On the same subject, this is an interesting clip with Farage and Hannan:

[media]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P7-SituQpV0&feature=player_embedded[/media]

He said today that he wont be holding a refurendum on it.Apparently there are more important things to worry about.Short of an imminent nuclear attack,I cant imagine what they might be.
Like I said,a boy doing a mans job.Hope his testicles drop soon and he ceases to defy medical science by walking upright without a spine. >:( >:( >:( >:( >:(
Title: Re: Is Cameron's guarantee worthless?
Post by: HolyCount on 03 November 2009, 20:12:18
In answer to the original question .....

Yes! His word, along with every other politician, it seems, IS worthless !  >:(
Title: Re: Is Cameron's guarantee worthless?
Post by: Dishevelled Den on 03 November 2009, 20:19:35
On the point of having conviction over one's statements I can see and sympathise with your point A.

There is a basic difficulty however in that when the treaty is ratified in its entirety the conditions are subsumed into European law.

Any one wishing to do something about it - including the Tories under DC - would find it all but impossible to achieve any satisfactory result short of withdrawing from the main framework of the EU.

This would prove very difficult and may result in a legal, practical and political problem of such proportion and complexity that the interests of this country could be placed in jeopardy for some time from that point.

It seems that we have been 'done up like a kipper' by the Brown regime and Brussels.

I would have thought however that DC should have considered the possibility of this happening as it has  - and if he didn't, one would have to question his judgement or the efficacy of the advice he was given and his ability to assess it.
Title: Re: Is Cameron's guarantee worthless?
Post by: albitz on 03 November 2009, 21:08:37
Quote
On the point of having conviction over one's statements I can see and sympathise with your point A.

There is a basic difficulty however in that when the treaty is ratified in its entirety the conditions are subsumed into European law.

Any one wishing to do something about it - including the Tories under DC - would find it all but impossible to achieve any satisfactory result short of withdrawing from the main framework of the EU.

This would prove very difficult and may result in a legal, practical and political problem of such proportion and complexity that the interests of this country could be placed in jeopardy for some time from that point.

It seems that we have been 'done up like a kipper' by the Brown regime and Brussels.

I would have thought however that DC should have considered the possibility of this happening as it has  - and if he didn't, one would have to question his judgement or the efficacy of the advice he was given and his ability to assess it.
Thats the one for me uncle. :y :y :y
Title: Re: Is Cameron's guarantee worthless?
Post by: Nickbat on 03 November 2009, 21:22:00
Quote
On the point of having conviction over one's statements I can see and sympathise with your point A.

There is a basic difficulty however in that when the treaty is ratified in its entirety the conditions are subsumed into European law.

Any one wishing to do something about it - including the Tories under DC - would find it all but impossible to achieve any satisfactory result short of withdrawing from the main framework of the EU.

This would prove very difficult and may result in a legal, practical and political problem of such proportion and complexity that the interests of this country could be placed in jeopardy for some time from that point.

It seems that we have been 'done up like a kipper' by the Brown regime and Brussels.

I would have thought however that DC should have considered the possibility of this happening as it has  - and if he didn't, one would have to question his judgement or the efficacy of the advice he was given and his ability to assess it.

The treaty is self-amending, in that it is now all but impossible to renegotiate any of its existing parts or any parts yet to come.

I would agree with Albs that the only way is to leave the EU. Sounds bizarre, I know, but until we do even that miniscule portion of our democracy that we still have will be eaten up by the superstate.

Even though this country may suffer financially (although I don't think we will), it is not all about money. Our previous generations fought over the freedom of people to determine our future thorugh our parliament. This Treaty is a backward step for democracy, not just for us, but for all the peoples of the Europe.

It is entirely illogical - and hypocritical - to devolve government to Scotland, Wales and (hesitatingly) Northern Ireland on the basis that this enhances democracy, yet surrender the power of the Westminster to the EU.

Thank you, Blair and Brown for selling our sovereignty for your own political advancement.

I'm off to UKIP.  >:( >:( >:(
Title: Re: Is Cameron's guarantee worthless?
Post by: HolyCount on 03 November 2009, 21:45:28
Quote
Quote
On the point of having conviction over one's statements I can see and sympathise with your point A.

There is a basic difficulty however in that when the treaty is ratified in its entirety the conditions are subsumed into European law.

Any one wishing to do something about it - including the Tories under DC - would find it all but impossible to achieve any satisfactory result short of withdrawing from the main framework of the EU.

This would prove very difficult and may result in a legal, practical and political problem of such proportion and complexity that the interests of this country could be placed in jeopardy for some time from that point.

It seems that we have been 'done up like a kipper' by the Brown regime and Brussels.

I would have thought however that DC should have considered the possibility of this happening as it has  - and if he didn't, one would have to question his judgement or the efficacy of the advice he was given and his ability to assess it.

The treaty is self-amending, in that it is now all but impossible to renegotiate any of its existing parts or any parts yet to come.

I would agree with Albs that the only way is to leave the EU. Sounds bizarre, I know, but until we do even that miniscule portion of our democracy that we still have will be eaten up by the superstate.

Even though this country may suffer financially (although I don't think we will), it is not all about money. Our previous generations fought over the freedom of people to determine our future thorugh our parliament. This Treaty is a backward step for democracy, not just for us, but for all the peoples of the Europe.

It is entirely illogical - and hypocritical - to devolve government to Scotland, Wales and (hesitatingly) Northern Ireland on the basis that this enhances democracy, yet surrender the power of the Westminster to the EU.

Thank you, Blair and Brown for selling our sovereignty for your own political advancement.

I'm off to UKIP.  >:( >:( >:(

Well ..... they've sold everything else  >:(
Title: Re: Is Cameron's guarantee worthless?
Post by: Richie London on 03 November 2009, 21:55:16
what sort of a pratt believed him in the first place. i'd trust an mp  as much as i would trust a lion not to eat a lump of steak sitting a foot away from him.
Title: Re: Is Cameron's guarantee worthless?
Post by: hotel21 on 03 November 2009, 21:58:50
Quote
Quote
On the point of having conviction over one's statements I can see and sympathise with your point A.

There is a basic difficulty however in that when the treaty is ratified in its entirety the conditions are subsumed into European law.

Any one wishing to do something about it - including the Tories under DC - would find it all but impossible to achieve any satisfactory result short of withdrawing from the main framework of the EU.

This would prove very difficult and may result in a legal, practical and political problem of such proportion and complexity that the interests of this country could be placed in jeopardy for some time from that point.

It seems that we have been 'done up like a kipper' by the Brown regime and Brussels.

I would have thought however that DC should have considered the possibility of this happening as it has  - and if he didn't, one would have to question his judgement or the efficacy of the advice he was given and his ability to assess it.

The treaty is self-amending, in that it is now all but impossible to renegotiate any of its existing parts or any parts yet to come.

I would agree with Albs that the only way is to leave the EU. Sounds bizarre, I know, but until we do even that miniscule portion of our democracy that we still have will be eaten up by the superstate.

Even though this country may suffer financially (although I don't think we will), it is not all about money. Our previous generations fought over the freedom of people to determine our future thorugh our parliament. This Treaty is a backward step for democracy, not just for us, but for all the peoples of the Europe.

It is entirely illogical - and hypocritical - to devolve government to Scotland, Wales and (hesitatingly) Northern Ireland on the basis that this enhances democracy, yet surrender the power of the Westminster to the EU.

Thank you, Blair and Brown for selling our sovereignty for your own political advancement.
I'm off to UKIP.  >:( >:( >:(

Wasn't it Tomstone T(h)eath who was wanting us to go to the EU (EEC as was) in the first place?   :-?
Title: Re: Is Cameron's guarantee worthless?
Post by: Nickbat on 03 November 2009, 22:04:40
Quote

Wasn't it Tomstone T(h)eath who was wanting us to go to the EU (EEC as was) in the first place?   :-?

Yes, but the referendum that Heath introduced was for a purely economic trade area, like Efta, to which few had (or still have) objections. No one - other than a few politicans - realised that the seeds for a superstate were being planted. 

Title: Re: Is Cameron's guarantee worthless?
Post by: Vamps on 03 November 2009, 22:12:06
Quote
Quote
Quote
On the point of having conviction over one's statements I can see and sympathise with your point A.

There is a basic difficulty however in that when the treaty is ratified in its entirety the conditions are subsumed into European law.

Any one wishing to do something about it - including the Tories under DC - would find it all but impossible to achieve any satisfactory result short of withdrawing from the main framework of the EU.

This would prove very difficult and may result in a legal, practical and political problem of such proportion and complexity that the interests of this country could be placed in jeopardy for some time from that point.

It seems that we have been 'done up like a kipper' by the Brown regime and Brussels.

I would have thought however that DC should have considered the possibility of this happening as it has  - and if he didn't, one would have to question his judgement or the efficacy of the advice he was given and his ability to assess it.

The treaty is self-amending, in that it is now all but impossible to renegotiate any of its existing parts or any parts yet to come.

I would agree with Albs that the only way is to leave the EU. Sounds bizarre, I know, but until we do even that miniscule portion of our democracy that we still have will be eaten up by the superstate.

Even though this country may suffer financially (although I don't think we will), it is not all about money. Our previous generations fought over the freedom of people to determine our future thorugh our parliament. This Treaty is a backward step for democracy, not just for us, but for all the peoples of the Europe.

It is entirely illogical - and hypocritical - to devolve government to Scotland, Wales and (hesitatingly) Northern Ireland on the basis that this enhances democracy, yet surrender the power of the Westminster to the EU.

Thank you, Blair and Brown for selling our sovereignty for your own political advancement.
I'm off to UKIP.  >:( >:( >:(

Wasn't it Tomstone T(h)eath who was wanting us to go to the EU (EEC as was) in the first place?   :-?

I thought it was 'Thatcher' who started it.....
Title: Re: Is Cameron's guarantee worthless?
Post by: hotel21 on 03 November 2009, 22:16:12
Quote
I thought it was 'Thatcher' who started it.....
Thatcher or Heath, never mind....  As always, last one out/in gets the blame!!  ;D
Title: Re: Is Cameron's guarantee worthless?
Post by: Nickbat on 03 November 2009, 22:20:33
Quote
Quote
I thought it was 'Thatcher' who started it.....
Thatcher or Heath, never mind....  As always, last one out/in gets the blame!!  ;D

T'was Heath. >:( >:( >:(

"There is no question of any erosion of essential national sovereignty."

"There are some in this country who fear that in going into Europe, we shall in some way sacrifice independence and sovereignty. These fears I need hardly say are completely unjustified"
      
Ted Heath, British Conservative Prime Minister and noted Europhile. White Paper on the implications of joining the EEC, July 1971. Proven by later release of documents to be outright lies.

"There will not be a blueprint for a Federal Europe"
      
Ted Heath, British Conservative Prime Minister and noted Europhile. Speech in the House of Commons, 25 February 1970 in run-up to EEC entry
.

"There is no danger of a single currency."
      
Ted Heath, British Conservative Prime Minister and noted Europhile. EEC membership information leaflet, 1975.

Sissons: "...the single currency, the United States of Europe: was that on your mind when you took Britain in?"

Heath: "Of course, Yes."
      
Ted Heath, British Conservative Prime Minister and noted europhile, and Peter Sissons, BBC journalist and presenter. Question Time with Peter Sissons, 1 November 1991.

http://www.liebreich.com/LDC/HTML/Europe/06-Democracy.html
Title: Re: Is Cameron's guarantee worthless?
Post by: hotel21 on 03 November 2009, 22:23:52
So, hypothetically speaking, irrespective of the party colour - trust no one?

And dont neccessarily jump on a passing bandwaggon and blame the current incumbents for the errors of the assorted predecessors....   ;D
Title: Re: Is Cameron's guarantee worthless?
Post by: Field Marshal Dr. Opti on 03 November 2009, 22:37:18
Quote
On the point of having conviction over one's statements I can see and sympathise with your point A.

There is a basic difficulty however in that when the treaty is ratified in its entirety the conditions are subsumed into European law.

Any one wishing to do something about it - including the Tories under DC - would find it all but impossible to achieve any satisfactory result short of withdrawing from the main framework of the EU.

This would prove very difficult and may result in a legal, practical and political problem of such proportion and complexity that the interests of this country could be placed in jeopardy for some time from that point.

It seems that we have been 'done up like a kipper' by the Brown regime and Brussels.

I would have thought however that DC should have considered the possibility of this happening as it has  - and if he didn't, one would have to question his judgement or the efficacy of the advice he was given and his ability to assess it.

Agreed.....almost inevitable.......poor judgement on his part. :-/ :-/ :y
Title: Re: Is Cameron's guarantee worthless?
Post by: Dishevelled Den on 03 November 2009, 23:04:43
Quote
So, hypothetically speaking, irrespective of the party colour - trust no one?

And dont neccessarily jump on a passing bandwaggon and blame the current incumbents for the errors of the assorted predecessors....   ;D



I would have to disagree with you on that H. 

The present incumbents and their breakless predecessors willingly opened their administrative legs for whatever Brussels decided to put their way.

The resultant disease from that rape of democracy will pervade this country from this point onwards.


T Blair and G Brown have shown little regard for the sovereignty of this nation and have denied the electorate the right to have a say in such a fundamental shift of power.

They have been in office for nearly 12 years and at no time, as it now seems, were we ever to get the chance to have a say on this matter.

That being the case, I would submit that both this administration and the previous can be fairly and squarely put on the spot and condemned for cowardice and sharp practice the result of which has seen the sovereignty of this land discarded.
Title: Re: Is Cameron's guarantee worthless?
Post by: Dishevelled Den on 03 November 2009, 23:08:47
Quote
Quote
On the point of having conviction over one's statements I can see and sympathise with your point A.

There is a basic difficulty however in that when the treaty is ratified in its entirety the conditions are subsumed into European law.

Any one wishing to do something about it - including the Tories under DC - would find it all but impossible to achieve any satisfactory result short of withdrawing from the main framework of the EU.

This would prove very difficult and may result in a legal, practical and political problem of such proportion and complexity that the interests of this country could be placed in jeopardy for some time from that point.

It seems that we have been 'done up like a kipper' by the Brown regime and Brussels.

I would have thought however that DC should have considered the possibility of this happening as it has  - and if he didn't, one would have to question his judgement or the efficacy of the advice he was given and his ability to assess it.

The treaty is self-amending, in that it is now all but impossible to renegotiate any of its existing parts or any parts yet to come.

I would agree with Albs that the only way is to leave the EU. Sounds bizarre, I know, but until we do even that miniscule portion of our democracy that we still have will be eaten up by the superstate.

Even though this country may suffer financially (although I don't think we will), it is not all about money. Our previous generations fought over the freedom of people to determine our future thorugh our parliament. This Treaty is a backward step for democracy, not just for us, but for all the peoples of the Europe.

It is entirely illogical - and hypocritical - to devolve government to Scotland, Wales and (hesitatingly) Northern Ireland on the basis that this enhances democracy, yet surrender the power of the Westminster to the EU.

Thank you, Blair and Brown for selling our sovereignty for your own political advancement.
I'm off to UKIP.  >:( >:( >:(



That's the kernel of this whole sorry affair!

Self-serving bastards >:(

Bah
Title: Re: Is Cameron's guarantee worthless?
Post by: Martin_1962 on 03 November 2009, 23:24:41
Is the gist of it that the traitors Blair & Brown have stuffed anyone else undoing the treaty?

Is this why Cameron has to give up?

If so Blair & Brown need stringing up.

Can't the Queen order something?

Isn't it illegal to hand powers to foreign control?
Title: Re: Is Cameron's guarantee worthless?
Post by: Nickbat on 03 November 2009, 23:27:26
OK, here's my prophecy.

Daniel Hannan will jump ship and join UKIP and be elected leader.

Election in 2010: Hung government. Con/UKIP holding majority (could be either way), Labour third. LibDems obliterated.

I reserve the right to amend this prophecy as soon as it starts to look daft!  ;)  ;D ;D
Title: Re: Is Cameron's guarantee worthless?
Post by: Nickbat on 03 November 2009, 23:30:02
Quote
Is the gist of it that the traitors Blair & Brown have stuffed anyone else undoing the treaty?

Is this why Cameron has to give up?

If so Blair & Brown need stringing up.

Can't the Queen order something?

Isn't it illegal to hand powers to foreign control?

Probably not under EU law.  >:( :( :(
Title: Re: Is Cameron's guarantee worthless?
Post by: Martin_1962 on 03 November 2009, 23:30:53
Quote
Quote
Is the gist of it that the traitors Blair & Brown have stuffed anyone else undoing the treaty?

Is this why Cameron has to give up?

If so Blair & Brown need stringing up.

Can't the Queen order something?

Isn't it illegal to hand powers to foreign control?

Probably not under EU law.  >:( :( :(


What about British law?
Title: Re: Is Cameron's guarantee worthless?
Post by: Vamps on 03 November 2009, 23:33:40
Election before Christmas, councils are getting everything ready... :-X
Conservatives have blown it, they have nothing to offer and it was them that took us into the EU

I am not at all sure where this will leave things.... :(
Title: Re: Is Cameron's guarantee worthless?
Post by: Dishevelled Den on 03 November 2009, 23:34:14
Quote
Quote
Quote
Is the gist of it that the traitors Blair & Brown have stuffed anyone else undoing the treaty?

Is this why Cameron has to give up?

If so Blair & Brown need stringing up.

Can't the Queen order something?

Isn't it illegal to hand powers to foreign control?

Probably not under EU law.  >:( :( :(


What about British law?


...for British law read European law! >:(
Title: Re: Is Cameron's guarantee worthless?
Post by: Nickbat on 03 November 2009, 23:35:45
Quote
Election before Christmas, councils are getting everything ready... :-X
Conservatives have blown it, they have nothing to offer and it was them that took us into the EU

I am not at all sure where this will leave things.... :(


Do you have evidence of that? I would have thought that Brown would want to stay at the helm (steering towards the iceberg) for as long as possible.  :(
Title: Re: Is Cameron's guarantee worthless?
Post by: Vamps on 03 November 2009, 23:37:03
Quote
Quote
Election before Christmas, councils are getting everything ready... :-X
Conservatives have blown it, they have nothing to offer and it was them that took us into the EU

I am not at all sure where this will leave things.... :(


Do you have evidence of that? I would have thought that Brown would want to stay at the helm (steering towards the iceberg) for as long as possible.  :(

Yep..... :-X :-X
Title: Re: Is Cameron's guarantee worthless?
Post by: hotel21 on 03 November 2009, 23:37:09
I still say this is a road initially travelled by those wearing coats of many colours.  Once the flood gates were opened in suggesting joining the EEC/EU it was an inevitable outcome, sadly......
Title: Re: Is Cameron's guarantee worthless?
Post by: Dishevelled Den on 03 November 2009, 23:49:12
Quote
I still say this is a road initially travelled by those wearing coats of many colours.  Once the flood gates were opened in suggesting joining the EEC/EU it was an inevitable outcome, sadly......



I'm happy to agree with you on that H.  We presently bear witness to the end game.
Title: Re: Is Cameron's guarantee worthless?
Post by: Nickbat on 03 November 2009, 23:52:02
Quote
Quote
Quote
Election before Christmas, councils are getting everything ready... :-X
Conservatives have blown it, they have nothing to offer and it was them that took us into the EU

I am not at all sure where this will leave things.... :(


Do you have evidence of that? I would have thought that Brown would want to stay at the helm (steering towards the iceberg) for as long as possible.  :(

Yep..... :-X :-X

Well, I accept your word on that, Vamps. I thought GB would hold on longer, especially with the December Copenhagen Climate Agreement coming up. Also, I read a rumour that he was about to try and foist the euro on us before he left office, but I think that is BS. ;)
Title: Re: Is Cameron's guarantee worthless?
Post by: Vamps on 03 November 2009, 23:55:52
Quote
Quote
Quote
Quote
Election before Christmas, councils are getting everything ready... :-X
Conservatives have blown it, they have nothing to offer and it was them that took us into the EU

I am not at all sure where this will leave things.... :(


Do you have evidence of that? I would have thought that Brown would want to stay at the helm (steering towards the iceberg) for as long as possible.  :(

Yep..... :-X :-X

Well, I accept your word on that, Vamps. I thought GB would hold on longer, especially with the December Copenhagen Climate Agreement coming up. Also, I read a rumour that he was about to try and foist the euro on us before he left office, but I think that is BS. ;)

If I am wrong I will happily tell you why I make that statement, after Christmas, but best not say anything now. You only need 17 days to call an election.
Title: Re: Is Cameron's guarantee worthless?
Post by: Varche on 04 November 2009, 12:09:41
Quote
OK, here's my prophecy.

Daniel Hannan will jump ship and join UKIP and be elected leader.

Election in 2010: Hung government. Con/UKIP holding majority (could be either way), Labour third. LibDems obliterated.

I reserve the right to amend this prophecy as soon as it starts to look daft!  ;)  ;D ;D


Nick I agree with the basis of your prophecy. Here is mine.

The Conservatives will just scrape in. Lib Dems, Ukip and shock horror BNP will take a lot of the remaining votes with Labour trailing well behind. Even the Greens will make ground.

The Conservatives will have to power share to be able to make progress.

As to not having a referendum. The Conservatives have seriously misjudged the mood of the UK. Just what is it that we the ordinary people cannot be told about the mighty EU? One despairs.

Varche
Title: Re: Is Cameron's guarantee worthless?
Post by: Nickbat on 04 November 2009, 13:28:39
Quote
Quote
OK, here's my prophecy.

Daniel Hannan will jump ship and join UKIP and be elected leader.

Election in 2010: Hung government. Con/UKIP holding majority (could be either way), Labour third. LibDems obliterated.

I reserve the right to amend this prophecy as soon as it starts to look daft!  ;)  ;D ;D


Nick I agree with the basis of your prophecy. Here is mine.

The Conservatives will just scrape in. Lib Dems, Ukip and shock horror BNP will take a lot of the remaining votes with Labour trailing well behind. Even the Greens will make ground.

The Conservatives will have to power share to be able to make progress.

As to not having a referendum. The Conservatives have seriously misjudged the mood of the UK. Just what is it that we the ordinary people cannot be told about the mighty EU? One despairs.

Varche

My sentiments entirely, Varche.

But what would the UK be like outside the EU.

I've just ordered a free book (from the Taxpayers Alliance) to tell me.  :y

Everyone else can, too.

http://www.greateudebate.com/

 :y
Title: Re: Is Cameron's guarantee worthless?
Post by: Dishevelled Den on 04 November 2009, 13:32:58
Quote
Quote
OK, here's my prophecy.

Daniel Hannan will jump ship and join UKIP and be elected leader.

Election in 2010: Hung government. Con/UKIP holding majority (could be either way), Labour third. LibDems obliterated.

I reserve the right to amend this prophecy as soon as it starts to look daft!  ;)  ;D ;D


Nick I agree with the basis of your prophecy. Here is mine.

The Conservatives will just scrape in. Lib Dems, Ukip and shock horror BNP will take a lot of the remaining votes with Labour trailing well behind. Even the Greens will make ground.

The Conservatives will have to power share to be able to make progress.

As to not having a referendum. The Conservatives have seriously misjudged the mood of the UK. Just what is it that we the ordinary people cannot be told about the mighty EU? One despairs.

Varche


The Conservatives will have to power share to be able to make progress.


....and that will lead to a butcher's shop of a parliament V.  A complete waste of time.

One despairs

....and you have justifiable cause to do so V.

Title: Re: Is Cameron's guarantee worthless?
Post by: Lizzie_Zoom on 04 November 2009, 14:20:58
Well coming in late on this discussion, I will purely state that I WILL be voting CONSERVATIVE 8-) 8-) 8-) :y :y :y

I would far rather a politician be honest and say NOW that the referendum is a lost issue due to the LEGAL situation that Britain is now in, thanks to the LABOUR Government ratifying the Lisbon Treaty, and then everyone else now doing so to seal, legally, the agreement !!! >:( >:( >:( 

Cameron has told us the truth instead of stringing us along on a pack of lies.  Times have drastically changed since he first mentioned about holding a referendum!  Do NOT blame him for that. ::) ::) ::) ::)

A politician is legally bound by domestic, and in this case, international law like the rest of us.  He will just have to work within the Lisbon Treaty, with the rest of Europe to find what will be best for Britain. 8-) 8-)
Title: Re: Is Cameron's guarantee worthless?
Post by: Nickbat on 04 November 2009, 14:34:23
Quote
Well coming in late on this discussion, I will purely state that I WILL be voting CONSERVATIVE 8-) 8-) 8-) :y :y :y

I would far rather a politician be honest and say NOW that the referendum is a lost issue due to the LEGAL situation that Britain is now in, thanks to the LABOUR Government ratifying the Lisbon Treaty, and then everyone else now doing so to seal, legally, the agreement !!! >:( >:( >:( 

Cameron has told us the truth instead of stringing us along on a pack of lies.  Times have drastically changed since he first mentioned about holding a referendum!  Do NOT blame him for that. ::) ::) ::) ::)

A politician is legally bound by domestic, and in this case, international law like the rest of us.  He will just have to work within the Lisbon Treaty, with the rest of Europe to find what will be best for Britain. 8-) 8-)

Sorry, Lizzie, but you can't work within the Lisbon Treaty. It is designed so that no single country can work within it! ::)

Cameron's made a serious error of judgment. Even if a referendum on the treaty can be deemed technically pointless, it would nevertheless serve to give the people a voice which they have been denied for so long and, secondly, assuming a No vote, it would give him a mandate to be more assertive in the EU, even if it would not achieve much.

The bottom line is that he gave a cast-iron guarantee. If he walks away from it, no matter the arguments that "he only meant if it was not ratified before the GE", he has shown himself to be no better than previous politicians who have broken promises. >:(

He'd better come out with something substantive at 4pm or people will understandably leave the Tories in their droves.      
Title: Re: Is Cameron's guarantee worthless?
Post by: Dishevelled Den on 04 November 2009, 15:45:52
Quote
Quote
Well coming in late on this discussion, I will purely state that I WILL be voting CONSERVATIVE 8-) 8-) 8-) :y :y :y

I would far rather a politician be honest and say NOW that the referendum is a lost issue due to the LEGAL situation that Britain is now in, thanks to the LABOUR Government ratifying the Lisbon Treaty, and then everyone else now doing so to seal, legally, the agreement !!! >:( >:( >:( 

Cameron has told us the truth instead of stringing us along on a pack of lies.  Times have drastically changed since he first mentioned about holding a referendum!  Do NOT blame him for that. ::) ::) ::) ::)

A politician is legally bound by domestic, and in this case, international law like the rest of us. He will just have to work within the Lisbon Treaty, with the rest of Europe to find what will be best for Britain. 8-) 8-)

Sorry, Lizzie, but you can't work within the Lisbon Treaty. It is designed so that no single country can work within it! ::)

Cameron's made a serious error of judgment. Even if a referendum on the treaty can be deemed technically pointless, it would nevertheless serve to give the people a voice which they have been denied for so long and, secondly, assuming a No vote, it would give him a mandate to be more assertive in the EU, even if it would not achieve much.
The bottom line is that he gave a cast-iron guarantee. If he walks away from it, no matter the arguments that "he only meant if it was not ratified before the GE", he has shown himself to be no better than previous politicians who have broken promises. >:(

He'd better come out with something substantive at 4pm or people will understandably leave the Tories in their droves.      


David Davis was suggesting as much today, however - as you state - it would very much be the case of the Emperor really having no clothes to protect us from the avaricious eyes of Brussels.

This a done deal and there's no practical way out of it as it seems that we've lost our national resolve to maintain our independent traditions.

It only remains for me to thank Prime Minister Brown, and the New Labour government, for casting the British people adrift in the murky depths of Europe and eradicating centuries of independence from foreign rule.

The Franco/German pact has won after all.
Title: Re: Is Cameron's guarantee worthless?
Post by: Field Marshal Dr. Opti on 04 November 2009, 16:25:17
Jesus...............this is hardly a pro-Europe thread.....there must be very few Liberal Democrats on OOF..........if this thread is anything to go by. :-/ :-/

If this discussion is representative ........of how people feel ......we may well end up with a UKIP...."Little Englander" government.....made up largely .....of disgruntled Ex-Tory voters..... ;) ;) ;)
A potential problem .....for David Cameron.....Perhaps... ::) ;)
Title: Re: Is Cameron's guarantee worthless?
Post by: Nickbat on 04 November 2009, 16:32:43
Quote
Jesus...............this is hardly a pro-Europe thread.....there must be very few Liberal Democrats on OOF..........if this thread is anything to go by. :-/ :-/

If this discussion is representative ........of how people feel ......we may well end up with a UKIP...."Little Englander" government.....made up largely .....of disgruntled Ex-Tory voters..... ;) ;) ;)
A potential problem .....for David Cameron.....Perhaps... ::) ;)

At least with a UKIP...."Little Englander" government, we would have a chance to air our views and lobby the decision makers. In the new post-lisbon EU, there is no democracy. I'll repeat that for you, NO DEMOCRACY.

That's why it's bad. And it's bad for the left as well as the right. You may think that the new EU President will be a fellow leftie but with this apparatus in place, there is no way to prevent, in the future, a left or right extremist controlling the superstate.

We should get out now. I'm convinced of that.  >:( >:( >:( >:(
Title: Re: Is Cameron's guarantee worthless?
Post by: Dishevelled Den on 04 November 2009, 19:12:16
Quote
Jesus...............this is hardly a pro-Europe thread.....there must be very few Liberal Democrats on OOF..........if this thread is anything to go by. :-/ :-/

If this discussion is representative ........of how people feel ......we may well end up with a UKIP...."Little Englander" government.....made up largely .....of disgruntled Ex-Tory voters..... ;) ;) ;)
A potential problem .....for David Cameron.....Perhaps... ::) ;)


very few Liberal Democrats on OOF


...that can only be a good thing Opti.


Little Englander


...I think that would be a mistaken and short-sighted goal Opti, I do feel however that we should have full control over our national legislature, something that will now be lost after this stitch-up/ratification.
Title: Re: Is Cameron's guarantee worthless?
Post by: Field Marshal Dr. Opti on 04 November 2009, 19:46:20
Quote
Quote
Jesus...............this is hardly a pro-Europe thread.....there must be very few Liberal Democrats on OOF..........if this thread is anything to go by. :-/ :-/

If this discussion is representative ........of how people feel ......we may well end up with a UKIP...."Little Englander" government.....made up largely .....of disgruntled Ex-Tory voters..... ;) ;) ;)
A potential problem .....for David Cameron.....Perhaps... ::) ;)

At least with a UKIP...."Little Englander" government, we would have a chance to air our views and lobby the decision makers. In the new post-lisbon EU, there is no democracy. I'll repeat that for you, NO DEMOCRACY[/b].

That's why it's bad. And it's bad for the left as well as the right. You may think that the new EU President will be a fellow leftie but with this apparatus in place, there is no way to prevent, in the future, a left or right extremist controlling the superstate.

We should get out now. I'm convinced of that.  >:( >:( >:( >:(

Once is quite sufficient thanks....Nickbat..... :P :P :P ;)
Sadly.....UKIP.....is too insular and introspective a political party for my taste.
However.......I imagine........... that it could well appeal to many elderly members of society.......who wish to take Britain back to the nineteen fifties.....in a misguided belief that everything was so much better in the "Days of Empire"................. ::) ::) :) :) ;)
Title: Re: Is Cameron's guarantee worthless?
Post by: Dishevelled Den on 04 November 2009, 19:58:13
Quote
Quote
Quote
Jesus...............this is hardly a pro-Europe thread.....there must be very few Liberal Democrats on OOF..........if this thread is anything to go by. :-/ :-/

If this discussion is representative ........of how people feel ......we may well end up with a UKIP...."Little Englander" government.....made up largely .....of disgruntled Ex-Tory voters..... ;) ;) ;)
A potential problem .....for David Cameron.....Perhaps... ::) ;)

At least with a UKIP...."Little Englander" government, we would have a chance to air our views and lobby the decision makers. In the new post-lisbon EU, there is no democracy. I'll repeat that for you, NO DEMOCRACY[/b].

That's why it's bad. And it's bad for the left as well as the right. You may think that the new EU President will be a fellow leftie but with this apparatus in place, there is no way to prevent, in the future, a left or right extremist controlling the superstate.

We should get out now. I'm convinced of that.  >:( >:( >:( >:(

Once is quite sufficient thanks....Nickbat..... :P :P :P ;)
Sadly.....UKIP.....is too insular and introspective a political party for my taste.
However.......I imagine........... that it could well appeal to many elderly members of society.......who wish to take Britain back to the nineteen fifties.....in a misguided belief that everything was so much better in the "Days of Empire"................. ::) ::) :) :) ;)


 ;D ;D Aah those heady days  8-) 8-)  ;D ;D :y
Title: Re: Is Cameron's guarantee worthless?
Post by: Field Marshal Dr. Opti on 04 November 2009, 20:04:22
Quote
Quote
Quote
Quote
Jesus...............this is hardly a pro-Europe thread.....there must be very few Liberal Democrats on OOF..........if this thread is anything to go by. :-/ :-/

If this discussion is representative ........of how people feel ......we may well end up with a UKIP...."Little Englander" government.....made up largely .....of disgruntled Ex-Tory voters..... ;) ;) ;)
A potential problem .....for David Cameron.....Perhaps... ::) ;)

At least with a UKIP...."Little Englander" government, we would have a chance to air our views and lobby the decision makers. In the new post-lisbon EU, there is no democracy. I'll repeat that for you, NO DEMOCRACY[/b].

That's why it's bad. And it's bad for the left as well as the right. You may think that the new EU President will be a fellow leftie but with this apparatus in place, there is no way to prevent, in the future, a left or right extremist controlling the superstate.

We should get out now. I'm convinced of that.  >:( >:( >:( >:(

Once is quite sufficient thanks....Nickbat..... :P :P :P ;)
Sadly.....UKIP.....is too insular and introspective a political party for my taste.
However.......I imagine........... that it could well appeal to many elderly members of society.......who wish to take Britain back to the nineteen fifties.....in a misguided belief that everything was so much better in the "Days of Empire"................. ::) ::) :) :) ;)


 ;D ;D Aah those heady days  8-) 8-)  ;D ;D :y
.......if only Supermac still had the reins......eh....Zulu.. ;D ;D :y
Title: Re: Is Cameron's guarantee worthless?
Post by: albitz on 04 November 2009, 20:23:41
Quote
So, hypothetically speaking, irrespective of the party colour - trust no one?

And dont neccessarily jump on a passing bandwaggon and blame the current incumbents for the errors of the assorted predecessors....   ;D
The reason for putting so much blame on the current lot is the fact that it was a major plank in their last manifesto that they would (in order to uphold democracy) give the British people a referendum on the proposed EU constitution.Shortly after this happened,many EU countries voted the constitutiopn down,so they moved a few commas and full stops and renamed it "The Lisbon Treaty" at which point our glorious leaders declared that it was no longer a constitution so they didnt need to keep their promise.Brown was so embarreses about his treachery that he turned up late for the official signing in order to keep himself out of the photo session (Im not making this up,honestly).Both the Tories and Lib Dems promised a referendum if they came to power and then changed their minds ,dont know why the Lib dems bothered. ::)
The reasoning behind all this became clear shortly after Bliar left office and started campaigning to be the president of europe,which apparently now looks unlikely.We should I suppose be grateful for small mercies. :(
Title: Re: Is Cameron's guarantee worthless?
Post by: albitz on 04 November 2009, 20:32:31
Quote
Quote
Quote
Quote
Election before Christmas, councils are getting everything ready... :-X
Conservatives have blown it, they have nothing to offer and it was them that took us into the EU

I am not at all sure where this will leave things.... :(


Do you have evidence of that? I would have thought that Brown would want to stay at the helm (steering towards the iceberg) for as long as possible.  :(

Yep..... :-X :-X

Well, I accept your word on that, Vamps. I thought GB would hold on longer, especially with the December Copenhagen Climate Agreement coming up. Also, I read a rumour that he was about to try and foist the euro on us before he left office, but I think that is BS. ;)
I have had a sneaking suspicion for a while now that Brown,being the spinless cowardly egomaniac that he is ,might retire suddenly on health grounds (failing eyesight ring any bells) rather than face defeat at the ballot box.His legacy could then be written as a man who was almost one of the greatest leaders of our times,but the health issues which he battled bravely against for so long finaaly caught up with him,blah,blah etc,etc,
I might be wrong though. ::) :D
Title: Re: Is Cameron's guarantee worthless?
Post by: albitz on 04 November 2009, 20:42:16
Quote
Jesus...............this is hardly a pro-Europe thread.....there must be very few Liberal Democrats on OOF..........if this thread is anything to go by. :-/ :-/

If this discussion is representative ........of how people feel ......we may well end up with a UKIP...."Little Englander" government.....made up largely .....of disgruntled Ex-Tory voters..... ;) ;) ;)A potential problem .....for David Cameron.....Perhaps... ::) ;)
We can live in hope. :y :y :y ;D..........Im not English btw. ;)......but I am British,and much more importantly I am a Democrat.I have lost good friends,young people in their prime,and very nearly lost my mother,all for the cause of defending democracy in this United Kingdom.For me this is an issue which is gravely important.
My own prediction for the election is that the Tories will win it comfortably.The only thing which might prevent this is that they might now have civil war in the party again over Europe,in which case the media will tear them to pieces. ;)
Title: Re: Is Cameron's guarantee worthless?
Post by: albitz on 04 November 2009, 20:52:53
Quote
Well coming in late on this discussion, I will purely state that I WILL be voting CONSERVATIVE 8-) 8-) 8-) :y :y :y

I would far rather a politician be honest and say NOW that the referendum is a lost issue due to the LEGAL situation that Britain is now in, thanks to the LABOUR Government ratifying the Lisbon Treaty, and then everyone else now doing so to seal, legally, the agreement !!! >:( >:( >:( 

Cameron has told us the truth instead of stringing us along on a pack of lies.  Times have drastically changed since he first mentioned about holding a referendum!  Do NOT blame him for that. ::) ::) ::) ::)

A politician is legally bound by domestic, and in this case, international law like the rest of us.  He will just have to work within the Lisbon Treaty, with the rest of Europe to find what will be best for Britain. 8-) 8-)
He didnt mention a referendum,he gave the British people a "cast iron gurantee" that he would hold one,he isnt completely stupid,he knew that it may well be ratified before he came to power. ;)
Imo,if he had a backbone and held the countries interests above his own he would take the view that the Britsh people voted to join the common market many years ago,but Europe has changed into something which bears no resemblence to what they voted for and they havent been allowed to vote on any of the changes,so we should have a once and for all referendum in the U.K. to either become fully paid up members of the U.S.E. (as that is what it now is ) or leave altogether and find out if this country is still capable of survivng on its own.We did do rather well for ourselves for many centuries up to about 40 years ago. :y
Title: Re: Is Cameron's guarantee worthless?
Post by: Nickbat on 04 November 2009, 21:42:35
Quote
Quote
Well coming in late on this discussion, I will purely state that I WILL be voting CONSERVATIVE 8-) 8-) 8-) :y :y :y

I would far rather a politician be honest and say NOW that the referendum is a lost issue due to the LEGAL situation that Britain is now in, thanks to the LABOUR Government ratifying the Lisbon Treaty, and then everyone else now doing so to seal, legally, the agreement !!! >:( >:( >:( 

Cameron has told us the truth instead of stringing us along on a pack of lies.  Times have drastically changed since he first mentioned about holding a referendum!  Do NOT blame him for that. ::) ::) ::) ::)

A politician is legally bound by domestic, and in this case, international law like the rest of us.  He will just have to work within the Lisbon Treaty, with the rest of Europe to find what will be best for Britain. 8-) 8-)
He didnt mention a referendum,he gave the British people a "cast iron gurantee" that he would hold one,he isnt completely stupid,he knew that it may well be ratified before he came to power. ;)
Imo,if he had a backbone and held the countries interests above his own he would take the view that the Britsh people voted to join the common market many years ago,but Europe has changed into something which bears no resemblence to what they voted for and they havent been allowed to vote on any of the changes,so we should have a once and for all referendum in the U.K. to either become fully paid up members of the U.S.E. (as that is what it now is ) or leave altogether and find out if this country is still capable of survivng on its own.We did do rather well for ourselves for many centuries up to about 40 years ago. :y

I see it increasingly referred to as the EUSSR, Albs.  :( ;)
Title: Re: Is Cameron's guarantee worthless?
Post by: albitz on 04 November 2009, 21:50:37
I wont argue with that Nick.Welcome to UKIP btw. :y  :)
Title: Re: Is Cameron's guarantee worthless?
Post by: Nickbat on 04 November 2009, 22:03:18
For Lizzie:
"Speaking to the Guardian, the French Europe minister, Pierre Lellouche, describes as "pathetic" the Tories' EU plans announced today, warning that they will not succeed "for a minute".

http://www.guardian.co.uk/politics/2009/nov/04/france-autistic-tories-castrated-uk

Nice to know that DC's views will be taken on board in the EU. ;) ::) ::)



BTW, thanks for the welcome, Albs!  :y
Title: Re: Is Cameron's guarantee worthless?
Post by: Dishevelled Den on 04 November 2009, 22:14:48
Quote
For Lizzie:
"Speaking to the Guardian, the French Europe minister, Pierre Lellouche, describes as "pathetic" the Tories' EU plans announced today, warning that they will not succeed "for a minute".

http://www.guardian.co.uk/politics/2009/nov/04/france-autistic-tories-castrated-uk

Nice to know that DC's views will be taken on board in the EU. ;) ::) ::)



BTW, thanks for the welcome, Albs!  :y



...I wonder what they're so worried about losing  ::) ::)

Perhaps we're not so irrelevant after all  ;) ;) ;)
Title: Re: Is Cameron's guarantee worthless?
Post by: Nickbat on 04 November 2009, 23:12:13
Quote
OK, here's my prophecy.

Daniel Hannan will jump ship and join UKIP and be elected leader.

Election in 2010: Hung government. Con/UKIP holding majority (could be either way), Labour third. LibDems obliterated.

I reserve the right to amend this prophecy as soon as it starts to look daft!  ;)  ;D ;D


*Daniel Hannan has resigned from the from the conservative front-bench in Europe.*

Could he...? Would he...?

Watch this space.  :y

Title: Re: Is Cameron's guarantee worthless?
Post by: Nickbat on 05 November 2009, 14:39:03
"The EU is a Reincarnation of the Former Soviet Union"
- Pravda

http://english.pravda.ru/opinion/columnists/04-11-2009/110289-berlin_wall-0

...and they should know. :( :(