Omega Owners Forum

Chat Area => General Discussion Area => Topic started by: Nickbat on 14 November 2009, 00:06:07

Title: What would YOU have done?
Post by: Nickbat on 14 November 2009, 00:06:07
Interesting situation:

"The crew of a UK military ship watched as a British couple were taken hostage by Somali pirates but were ordered not to open fire, it has emerged.

The crew member revealed that the RFA Wave Knight had come within just 50ft (15m) of the couple's yacht, the Lynn Rival, at one point.

The RFA Wave Knight did not act for fear of endangering the couple's lives, the Ministry of Defence (MoD) said.

The pirates have issued a $7 million (£4.3 million) ransom demand but the British government has insisted it will not make any ransom payment."


http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/8359575.stm

Imagine you're the captain of the Wave Knight. What would you have done?

 :-/
Title: Re: What would YOU have done?
Post by: Nickbat on 14 November 2009, 00:13:38
I know what I would have done... ;)

Title: Re: What would YOU have done?
Post by: Vamps on 14 November 2009, 00:19:13
I know what I would have done, the alternative is that the pirates win every time............ :(
Title: Re: What would YOU have done?
Post by: Amigo on 14 November 2009, 00:20:30
Service folk are disciplined to follow orders regardless & ther'e must be reasons why including the risk of harming those you're trying to save.
     As regards what would i do, i'd attack the pirates with everything i had...which is why i'm a civilian. I'm afraid my heart rules my head & i'd steam in regardless, could'nt stop myself.
    You did ask!!!! ;D
Title: Re: What would YOU have done?
Post by: CaptainZok on 14 November 2009, 00:40:41
Quote
I know what I would have done, the alternative is that the pirates win every time............ :(

Made em walk the plank in your naval days didn't you? ;D
Title: Re: What would YOU have done?
Post by: Kevin Wood on 14 November 2009, 01:03:28
Apparently they didn't have a trained sniper on board.

What about torpedos?

Kevin
Title: Re: What would YOU have done?
Post by: Entwood on 14 November 2009, 01:17:22
As I understand it, the concern was that any action taken would have put the couple in extreme danger ..... 

There is really not a lot of point in "rescuing" someone if it results in their death .... :(

Perhaps it is a good job the RFA was manned by professionals (who know what they can and can't do) and not by members of OOF .....  :)
Title: Re: What would YOU have done?
Post by: Dishevelled Den on 14 November 2009, 08:58:06
They did the right thing by following orders - any such intervention, unless in a rapidly unfolding and confrontational situation, has to be well capitalised and planned for any hope of success.
Title: Re: What would YOU have done?
Post by: Gaffers on 14 November 2009, 09:11:40
can you have imagine the poo storm if they had opened fire and hurt the Brits?
Title: Re: What would YOU have done?
Post by: Plomien on 14 November 2009, 09:22:42
If they hadn't boarded the boat yet i would have shot the s$%^ out of the pirates but with them onboard the boat its safer to step back and make sure no-one gets hurt :y
Title: Re: What would YOU have done?
Post by: tunnie on 14 November 2009, 09:39:06
from the reports the couple knew they were in dangerous waters, as it was well known it was a pirate area. Lots of forums have commented on why they were there?

In that situation i would have rammed the pirate ship, assuming its going to be very much smaller than the UK ship.... ram it, then when they are all swimming about, pick off the pirates one by one.
Title: Re: What would YOU have done?
Post by: Nickbat on 14 November 2009, 10:01:42
Quote
As I understand it, the concern was that any action taken would have put the couple in extreme danger ..... 

There is really not a lot of point in "rescuing" someone if it results in their death .... :(

Perhaps it is a good job the RFA was manned by professionals (who know what they can and can't do) and not by members of OOF .....  :)

There is an interesting point here, which no one has picked up and that is the fact that this report was leaked to the press by a crew member. To me, that suggests a very disgruntled crew member. In turn, that suggests to me that - perhaps - an opportunity to rescue the couple was missed.

Maybe it took time to get a phone call through to the valid Health & Safety Department. ::)

Just speculating.  ;) ;)
Title: Re: What would YOU have done?
Post by: STMO999 on 14 November 2009, 10:08:37
Imagine trying to take someone out with a single shot, while sitting on a ship that is rolling (even slightly), and the target is bobbing all over the place.
That's why they needed a trained sniper.
Title: Re: What would YOU have done?
Post by: jonnycool on 14 November 2009, 10:11:08
Quote
can you have imagine the poo storm if they had opened fire and hurt the Brits?
Exactly. Media would have been all over this like a rash
Title: Re: What would YOU have done?
Post by: Nickbat on 14 November 2009, 10:27:20
Read elsewhere:

"Still, you can imagine the conversation between the couple:
"Oh thank f**k. A warship. We've saved."
"No love, look again. It's one of ours..."


 ;) ;D
Title: Re: What would YOU have done?
Post by: Dishevelled Den on 14 November 2009, 11:07:42
Quote
Quote
As I understand it, the concern was that any action taken would have put the couple in extreme danger ..... 

There is really not a lot of point in "rescuing" someone if it results in their death .... :(

Perhaps it is a good job the RFA was manned by professionals (who know what they can and can't do) and not by members of OOF .....  :)

There is an interesting point here, which no one has picked up and that is the fact that this report was leaked to the press by a crew member. To me, that suggests a very disgruntled crew member. In turn, that suggests to me that - perhaps - an opportunity to rescue the couple was missed.

Maybe it took time to get a phone call through to the valid Health & Safety Department. ::)

Just speculating.  ;) ;)



...questioning of orders isn't a new thing Nick, it happens more than imagined. 

The difference between inappropriate and hasty action and a considered well thought out response to such an incident is a choice between life and death.

Never an easy decision to made in any given theatre of operation, but then that's what standing orders are all about, the mitigation of untoward harm coming to those under one's command and to those whom it's our duty to protect.

Once rounds are discharged the situation changes in dynamic rapidly and the result is not always the one  hoped for.
Title: Re: What would YOU have done?
Post by: Chris_H on 14 November 2009, 15:28:45
I take a different line (what's new! :D).

What's a warship doing in the vicinity un-prepared for tackling pirates?  The opportunity must be one the navy could only dream of.

Was Homer Simpson running the show?
[edit]
Ok read the news report now and it wasn't a warship but I still think it's a ridiculous opportunity missed that any military vessel on that area is not equipped; possibly merchant navy as well.[/edit]
Title: Re: What would YOU have done?
Post by: STMO999 on 14 November 2009, 15:32:58
The Royal Navy can only afford one sniper and it was his day off.
Title: Re: What would YOU have done?
Post by: Gaffers on 14 November 2009, 15:34:05
Quote
I take a different line (what's new! :D).

What's a warship doing in the vicinity un-prepared for tackling pirates?  The opportunity must be one the navy could only dream of.

Was Homer Simpson running the show?

Its a cargo ship delivering supplies and personnel to the ships working in the area.  Its like asking a hgv to follow and stop a rally car, it just aint gonna happen!
Title: Re: What would YOU have done?
Post by: STMO999 on 14 November 2009, 15:36:10
Quote
Quote
I take a different line (what's new! :D).

What's a warship doing in the vicinity un-prepared for tackling pirates?  The opportunity must be one the navy could only dream of.

Was Homer Simpson running the show?

Its a cargo ship delivering supplies and personnel to the ships working in the area.  Its like asking a hgv to follow and stop a rally car, it just aint gonna happen!


So...when it all boils down to it, the idiot who blew the whistle should have just kept his gob shut.
Title: Re: What would YOU have done?
Post by: Lizzie_Zoom on 14 November 2009, 15:37:16
Quote
I take a different line (what's new! :D).

What's a warship doing in the vicinity un-prepared for tackling pirates?  The opportunity must be one the navy could only dream of.

Was Homer Simpson running the show?


I think that is the important point here.  This "warship" is a Royal Fleet Auxilary, not designed or armed for hostile engagement, and no doubt carrying very large quantities of fuel for RAS'ing. It is also manned by civilians.

They would have not only endangered this couple, by would have put their ship and lives at risk unnecessarily.

I must also add that this area is very well known as being very dangerous for any ship or boat, and their crews, of any size.  So why, o' why did this couple act so stupidly as to sail into it?? ::) ::) ::) ::)
Title: Re: What would YOU have done?
Post by: Chris_H on 14 November 2009, 15:42:39
Quote
Quote
Quote
I take a different line (what's new! :D).

What's a warship doing in the vicinity un-prepared for tackling pirates?  The opportunity must be one the navy could only dream of.

Was Homer Simpson running the show?

Its a cargo ship delivering supplies and personnel to the ships working in the area.  Its like asking a hgv to follow and stop a rally car, it just aint gonna happen!


So...when it all boils down to it, the idiot who blew the whistle should have just kept his gob shut.
He almost certainly should have kept his mouth shut, especially if he was Service.

I still think it's just as mad having an unsuitably-armed military vessel in those waters as it is for the couple to be there in the first place.

The real warships should be putting men on board any UK-registered ship that has to go there.  The pirates will be nicking our supply vessels next.
Title: Re: What would YOU have done?
Post by: Entwood on 14 November 2009, 15:56:34
Quote
Quote
Quote
Quote
I take a different line (what's new! :D).

What's a warship doing in the vicinity un-prepared for tackling pirates?  The opportunity must be one the navy could only dream of.

Was Homer Simpson running the show?

Its a cargo ship delivering supplies and personnel to the ships working in the area.  Its like asking a hgv to follow and stop a rally car, it just aint gonna happen!


So...when it all boils down to it, the idiot who blew the whistle should have just kept his gob shut.
He almost certainly should have kept his mouth shut, especially if he was Service.

I still think it's just as mad having an unsuitably-armed military vessel in those waters as it is for the couple to be there in the first place.

The real warships should be putting men on board any UK-registered ship that has to go there.  The pirates will be nicking our supply vessels next.


The RFA vessel is there to re-supply the "real" ships doing the job. A modern warship uses a surprising amount of consumeables .. from food to fuel ... and a lot of time would be wasted if they had to "go off station" to a friendly port to resupply all the time.

It is probably simple coincidence that the RFA was "there" and not a "real" warship .. although depending on what was ACTUALLY happening rather than uninformd guesswork . a "real" warship may have been constrained by the same circumstances ....  a rescue that ends up with the hostages dead is pretty pointless.
Title: Re: What would YOU have done?
Post by: feeutfo on 14 November 2009, 17:07:35
as i understand it, hostages have always been well treated by pirates in that region? Given the circumstances, not worth opening fire. Even if it where possible. Too risky.

But i am sure the oof marines would have sorted that problem "right" out. No problem at all. ;D

Title: Re: What would YOU have done?
Post by: Nickbat on 14 November 2009, 17:16:46
Quote
Quote
I take a different line (what's new! :D).

What's a warship doing in the vicinity un-prepared for tackling pirates?  The opportunity must be one the navy could only dream of.

Was Homer Simpson running the show?


I think that is the important point here.  This "warship" is a Royal Fleet Auxilary, not designed or armed for hostile engagement, and no doubt carrying very large quantities of fuel for RAS'ing. It is also manned by civilians.

They would have not only endangered this couple, by would have put their ship and lives at risk unnecessarily.

I must also add that this area is very well known as being very dangerous for any ship or boat, and their crews, of any size.  So why, o' why did this couple act so stupidly as to sail into it?? ::) ::) ::) ::)


From link below:

The Commanding Officer of RFA Wave Knight, Captain Pilling, said:

"RFA Wave Knight is a modern replenishment ship designed to be able to support a myriad of coalition maritime operations. Our primary role is refuelling and aviation operations, but we are fully capable of conducting anti-piracy operations in and around the Horn of Africa
[/highlight].

http://www.royalnavy.mod.uk/news-and-events/rn-live/all-news/rfa-wave-knight-disrupts-pirate-attacks/*/changeNav/3533/noRedirect/1

 :-?
Title: Re: What would YOU have done?
Post by: Lizzie_Zoom on 14 November 2009, 17:19:07
Quote
Quote
Quote
I take a different line (what's new! :D).

What's a warship doing in the vicinity un-prepared for tackling pirates?  The opportunity must be one the navy could only dream of.

Was Homer Simpson running the show?


I think that is the important point here.  This "warship" is a Royal Fleet Auxilary, not designed or armed for hostile engagement, and no doubt carrying very large quantities of fuel for RAS'ing. It is also manned by civilians.

They would have not only endangered this couple, by would have put their ship and lives at risk unnecessarily.

I must also add that this area is very well known as being very dangerous for any ship or boat, and their crews, of any size.  So why, o' why did this couple act so stupidly as to sail into it?? ::) ::) ::) ::)


From link below:

The Commanding Officer of RFA Wave Knight, Captain Pilling, said:

"RFA Wave Knight is a modern replenishment ship designed to be able to support a myriad of coalition maritime operations. Our primary role is refuelling and aviation operations, but we are fully capable of conducting anti-piracy operations in and around the Horn of Africa
[/highlight].

http://www.royalnavy.mod.uk/news-and-events/rn-live/all-news/rfa-wave-knight-disrupts-pirate-attacks/*/changeNav/3533/noRedirect/1

 :-?


He is saying that in context of working with fully armed warships, not with his unarmed, civilian manned, RFA Nick. ;) ;) ;)
Title: Re: What would YOU have done?
Post by: Nickbat on 14 November 2009, 17:20:47
Quote
Quote
Quote
Quote
I take a different line (what's new! :D).

What's a warship doing in the vicinity un-prepared for tackling pirates?  The opportunity must be one the navy could only dream of.

Was Homer Simpson running the show?


I think that is the important point here.  This "warship" is a Royal Fleet Auxilary, not designed or armed for hostile engagement, and no doubt carrying very large quantities of fuel for RAS'ing. It is also manned by civilians.

They would have not only endangered this couple, by would have put their ship and lives at risk unnecessarily.

I must also add that this area is very well known as being very dangerous for any ship or boat, and their crews, of any size.  So why, o' why did this couple act so stupidly as to sail into it?? ::) ::) ::) ::)


From link below:

The Commanding Officer of RFA Wave Knight, Captain Pilling, said:

"RFA Wave Knight is a modern replenishment ship designed to be able to support a myriad of coalition maritime operations. Our primary role is refuelling and aviation operations, but we are fully capable of conducting anti-piracy operations in and around the Horn of Africa
[/highlight].

http://www.royalnavy.mod.uk/news-and-events/rn-live/all-news/rfa-wave-knight-disrupts-pirate-attacks/*/changeNav/3533/noRedirect/1

 :-?


He is saying that in context of working with fully armed warships, not with his unarmed, civilian manned, RFA Nick. ;) ;) ;)


Read the link again, Lizzie... ;)

"Wave Knight ordered the dhow to stop and used a Royal Navy armed force protection team as well as the ship's own weapons team to provide cover."
Title: Re: What would YOU have done?
Post by: PhilRich on 14 November 2009, 21:15:48
Our armed forces, especially the RN & RFA are supreme professionals and the 'best there is' anywhere.They are only constrained by Operational Necessity and Political Expediency. If it had been in any way possible for that couple to be freed without them coming to harm, this incident would now be 'old news' & they would be back home signing book/film rights to 'their' story. As for the 'dripper' who leaked the story? well....nuf said about him. :y
Title: Re: What would YOU have done?
Post by: BigAl on 15 November 2009, 02:06:22
Quote
Quote
I take a different line (what's new! :D).

What's a warship doing in the vicinity un-prepared for tackling pirates?  The opportunity must be one the navy could only dream of.

Was Homer Simpson running the show?


I think that is the important point here.  This "warship" is a Royal Fleet Auxilary, not designed or armed for hostile engagement, and no doubt carrying very large quantities of fuel for RAS'ing. It is also manned by civilians.

They would have not only endangered this couple, by would have put their ship and lives at risk unnecessarily.

I must also add that this area is very well known as being very dangerous for any ship or boat, and their crews, of any size.  So why, o' why did this couple act so stupidly as to sail into it?? ::) ::) ::) ::)
So why where the poor chaps from the RFA in the same scary area without Naval protection?
Title: Re: What would YOU have done?
Post by: Gaffers on 15 November 2009, 09:20:21
Quote

Read the link again, Lizzie... ;)

"Wave Knight ordered the dhow to stop and used a Royal Navy armed force protection team as well as the ship's own weapons team to provide cover."

On an RFA thats speak for an old man with a pellet gun.  :-X
Title: Re: What would YOU have done?
Post by: Lizzie_Zoom on 15 November 2009, 09:44:01
Quote
Quote

Read the link again, Lizzie... ;)

"Wave Knight ordered the dhow to stop and used a Royal Navy armed force protection team as well as the ship's own weapons team to provide cover."

On an RFA thats speak for an old man with a pellet gun.  :-X


Exactly, and when I said "unarmed" that is what I meant,  The RFA fleet have no deck armenant, beit guns or missile launchers of any type.  They are not an armed warship.  A few civilians with pop pop guns are not a match to scores of heavily armed pirates, and do not make an RFA "armed".

When an RFA is in the company of an RN warship, or "battle group", which they have to travel alone between distributing their supplies, then they are of course fully protected.  When not they are as exposed as an other merchant ship. ;) ;) ;)
Title: Re: What would YOU have done?
Post by: Gaffers on 15 November 2009, 09:45:40
Quote
Quote
Quote

Read the link again, Lizzie... ;)

"Wave Knight ordered the dhow to stop and used a Royal Navy armed force protection team as well as the ship's own weapons team to provide cover."

On an RFA thats speak for an old man with a pellet gun.  :-X


Exactly, and when I said "unarmed" that is what I meant,  The RFA fleet have no deck armenant, beit guns or missile launchers of any type.  They are not an armed warship.  A few civilians with pop pop guns are not a match to scores of heavily armed pirates, and do not make an RFA "armed".

When an RFA is in the company of an RN warship, or "battle group", which they have to travel alone between distributing their supplies, then they are of course fully protected.  When not they are as exposed as an other merchant ship. ;) ;) ;)

Dont forget either they may have different Rules of Engagement than their RN counterparts  :y
Title: Re: What would YOU have done?
Post by: Lizzie_Zoom on 15 November 2009, 09:49:01
Quote
Quote
Quote
Quote

Read the link again, Lizzie... ;)

"Wave Knight ordered the dhow to stop and used a Royal Navy armed force protection team as well as the ship's own weapons team to provide cover."

On an RFA thats speak for an old man with a pellet gun.  :-X


Exactly, and when I said "unarmed" that is what I meant,  The RFA fleet have no deck armenant, beit guns or missile launchers of any type.  They are not an armed warship.  A few civilians with pop pop guns are not a match to scores of heavily armed pirates, and do not make an RFA "armed".

When an RFA is in the company of an RN warship, or "battle group", which they have to travel alone between distributing their supplies, then they are of course fully protected.  When not they are as exposed as an other merchant ship. ;) ;) ;)

Dont forget either they may have different Rules of Engagement than their RN counterparts  :y


Indeed Guffers :y :y

Title: Re: What would YOU have done?
Post by: STMO999 on 15 November 2009, 10:29:45
Quote
Quote
Quote
Quote

Read the link again, Lizzie... ;)

"Wave Knight ordered the dhow to stop and used a Royal Navy armed force protection team as well as the ship's own weapons team to provide cover."

On an RFA thats speak for an old man with a pellet gun.  :-X


Exactly, and when I said "unarmed" that is what I meant,  The RFA fleet have no deck armenant, beit guns or missile launchers of any type.  They are not an armed warship.  A few civilians with pop pop guns are not a match to scores of heavily armed pirates, and do not make an RFA "armed".

When an RFA is in the company of an RN warship, or "battle group", which they have to travel alone between distributing their supplies, then they are of course fully protected.  When not they are as exposed as an other merchant ship. ;) ;) ;)

Dont forget either they may have different Rules of Engagement than their RN counterparts :y


Yes. While a little bit of 'man on man' was ok in the RN, actually getting engaged was frowned upon.
Title: Re: What would YOU have done?
Post by: Lizzie_Zoom on 15 November 2009, 10:43:06
Quote
Quote
Quote
Quote
Quote

Read the link again, Lizzie... ;)

"Wave Knight ordered the dhow to stop and used a Royal Navy armed force protection team as well as the ship's own weapons team to provide cover."

On an RFA thats speak for an old man with a pellet gun.  :-X


Exactly, and when I said "unarmed" that is what I meant,  The RFA fleet have no deck armenant, beit guns or missile launchers of any type.  They are not an armed warship.  A few civilians with pop pop guns are not a match to scores of heavily armed pirates, and do not make an RFA "armed".

When an RFA is in the company of an RN warship, or "battle group", which they have to travel alone between distributing their supplies, then they are of course fully protected.  When not they are as exposed as an other merchant ship. ;) ;) ;)

Dont forget either they may have different Rules of Engagement than their RN counterparts :y


Yes. While a little bit of 'man on man' was ok in the RN, actually getting engaged was frowned upon.

 ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D :y :y
Title: Re: What would YOU have done?
Post by: Gaffers on 15 November 2009, 14:30:37
Quote
Quote
Quote
Quote
Quote

Read the link again, Lizzie... ;)

"Wave Knight ordered the dhow to stop and used a Royal Navy armed force protection team as well as the ship's own weapons team to provide cover."

On an RFA thats speak for an old man with a pellet gun.  :-X


Exactly, and when I said "unarmed" that is what I meant,  The RFA fleet have no deck armenant, beit guns or missile launchers of any type.  They are not an armed warship.  A few civilians with pop pop guns are not a match to scores of heavily armed pirates, and do not make an RFA "armed".

When an RFA is in the company of an RN warship, or "battle group", which they have to travel alone between distributing their supplies, then they are of course fully protected.  When not they are as exposed as an other merchant ship. ;) ;) ;)

Dont forget either they may have different Rules of Engagement than their RN counterparts :y


Yes. While a little bit of 'man on man' was ok in the RN, actually getting engaged was frowned upon.

It's allowed in all 3 services now, it's just not compulsory.  ::) ::)