Omega Owners Forum

Chat Area => General Discussion Area => Topic started by: tigers_gonads on 14 January 2010, 22:02:31

Title: Anjem Choudary
Post by: tigers_gonads on 14 January 2010, 22:02:31
and we pay taxes for this man

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/programmes/the_daily_politics/8459410.stm

watch and discuss
Title: Re: Anjem Choudary
Post by: webby23 on 14 January 2010, 22:30:21
Dont even start talking to me about that man

 >:( >:( >:(
Title: Re: Anjem Choudary
Post by: tigers_gonads on 14 January 2010, 22:35:32
think we might have the same opinion of him  >:( >:(

only problem is .............. what do you do with him  >:(
you can't deport him, he is rather british  >:( >:(
Title: Re: Anjem Choudary
Post by: spacekid2009 on 14 January 2010, 22:36:16
this person and those like him make my blood boil. the only reason for this clowns proposed march was provocation. those brave soldiers defend this country to make it a safe place to lay your head at night, and the luxury of freedom of speech gets abused by the likes of that moron, i could go on and on, but the muppet really isn't worth my time.
Title: Re: Anjem Choudary
Post by: Olympia5776 on 14 January 2010, 22:39:24
Andrew Neil rolled out the normal inane and predictable points and questions , approached it in a brusque and totally inappropriate manner  and Choudrary actually fended them all without raising sweat ( or even his voice ) .
A woefully disappointing spectacle ( and lost opportunity ) which will only strengthen his support from his following.

Bring out Paxman..................
Title: Re: Anjem Choudary
Post by: tigers_gonads on 14 January 2010, 22:39:30
when HE has sharia law implemented in the uk !!!!

there will be blood in this country in my lifetime  >:(

its my son i feel sorry for
Title: Re: Anjem Choudary
Post by: tigers_gonads on 14 January 2010, 22:40:56
Quote
Andrew Neil rolled out the normal inane and predictable points and questions , approached it in a brusque and totally inappropriate manner  and Choudrary actually fended them all without raising sweat ( or even his voice ) .
A woefully disappointing spectacle ( and lost opportunity ) which will only strengthen his support from his following.

Bring out Paxman..................

agree to that  :y
Title: Re: Anjem Choudary
Post by: Nickbat on 14 January 2010, 23:00:13
Quote
Andrew Neil rolled out the normal inane and predictable points and questions , approached it in a brusque and totally inappropriate manner  and Choudrary actually fended them all without raising sweat ( or even his voice ) .
A woefully disappointing spectacle ( and lost opportunity ) which will only strengthen his support from his following.

Bring out Paxman..................


I thought Neil did well. Paxman would not have fared any better with such a person as Choudary. He evaded all the questions, but interestingly said "you'll have to wait and find out" when Neil pressed him on what the new name for his group would be.

Choudary is all the more dangerous because, like many of his ilk, not only is he clearly well-versed in evasiveness but also, like Macbeth's three witches, very good at equivocation when pressed. He claimed he never said "all adulterers, especially women, should be stoned to death"...but later went on to say that everyone should be subject to Sharia law.

An odious individual.  >:( >:( >:(    
Title: Re: Anjem Choudary
Post by: hotel21 on 14 January 2010, 23:02:30
Quote
and we pay taxes for this man

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/programmes/the_daily_politics/8459410.stm

watch and discuss

fella needs followed across a bridge and jabbed with a brolly, imo....    :-X
Title: Re: Anjem Choudary
Post by: Dishevelled Den on 14 January 2010, 23:28:17
Quote
Quote
Andrew Neil rolled out the normal inane and predictable points and questions , approached it in a brusque and totally inappropriate manner  and Choudrary actually fended them all without raising sweat ( or even his voice ) .
A woefully disappointing spectacle ( and lost opportunity ) which will only strengthen his support from his following.

Bring out Paxman..................


I thought Neil did well. Paxman would not have fared any better with such a person as Choudary. He evaded all the questions, but interestingly said "you'll have to wait and find out" when Neil pressed him on what the new name for his group would be.

Choudary is all the more dangerous because, like many of his ilk, not only is he clearly well-versed in evasiveness but also, like Macbeth's three witches, very good at equivocation when pressed. He claimed he never said "all adulterers, especially women, should be stoned to death"...but later went on to say that everyone should be subject to Sharia law.

An odious individual.  >:( >:( >:(    




My good friend Sig assures me that the matter will never gain traction on a wide spread basis.
Title: Re: Anjem Choudary
Post by: BigAl on 15 January 2010, 02:24:28
Quote
think we might have the same opinion of him  >:( >:(

only problem is .............. what do you do with him  >:(
you can't deport him, he is rather british  >:( >:(
I'll call you on that,he's not, he doesn't believe or abide by British law, so as said abroard " opps 'im" shoot the bastard"
Title: Re: Anjem Choudary
Post by: Banjax on 15 January 2010, 07:44:32
jeesus - old Brillo Pad was so lame he made the mad religious nutter look reasonable, far better interview on newsnight with Paxo and a moderate muslim guy who truly showed what a dangerous loon this guy is and what medieval tosh he believes.

all Neil did was mock a guy on benefits, completely missing the big picture for the sake of some easy grandstanding - pompous old fool i'm afraid  :(
Title: Re: Anjem Choudary
Post by: STMO999 on 15 January 2010, 10:36:50
You really must learn not to take fools like this too seriously. Sharia law? Cant even get that to stick in muslim countries. Man is man, and he does like a bit of what he aint suppose to. ;D
Title: Re: Anjem Choudary
Post by: Nickbat on 15 January 2010, 10:54:11
This will help get Sharia Law established.

http://atlasshrugs2000.typepad.com/atlas_shrugs/2010/01/euromed-partnership-forecast-50-million-muslims-into-europe.html

 :o :o
Title: Re: Anjem Choudary
Post by: STMO999 on 15 January 2010, 10:56:02
We need to set the news of the world on this fella. Bet he's dipped his wick or got pissed up somewhere along the way.
Title: Re: Anjem Choudary
Post by: STMO999 on 15 January 2010, 11:00:12
Quote
This will help get Sharia Law established.

http://atlasshrugs2000.typepad.com/atlas_shrugs/2010/01/euromed-partnership-forecast-50-million-muslims-into-europe.html

 :o :o


As I said earlier, Nick, not many muslims are partial to sharia law. In fact, the more liberal thinking muslim workers (as opposed to scroungers) we import, the less likely sharia will succeed.

In case that doesn't happen, I'm looking for volunteers to wear these nice new belts I'm making. ;D
Title: Re: Anjem Choudary
Post by: waspy on 15 January 2010, 11:52:54
No offence, but i'm not even gona bother to read the link.







<----------------