I agree totally Andy - as long as the unfortunate driver was uninjured, that's the main thing.
QuoteI agree totally Andy - as long as the unfortunate driver was uninjured, that's the main thing.
That is not what the owner of the Ferrari is thinking right now Zulu!! ::) ::) ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;)
Wonder what his boss said to him. would of loved to be a fly on the wall ;D ;D ;D ;D
Wonder what his boss said to him. would of loved to be a fly on the wall ;D ;D ;D ;D
It's only a car ::) ::) ;)
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/motoring/news/7720554/MOT-worker-wrecks-200000-Ferrari.html
Very different when you own the car.QuoteIt's only a car ::) ::) ;)
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/motoring/news/7720554/MOT-worker-wrecks-200000-Ferrari.html
didnt "mr bean" do a similar thing to his mclaren? :-?
so how is cameron and ferris bueller?No idea , but the replicca was recently sold see:-http://www.rac.co.uk/news-advice/motoring-news/post/2010/4/ferris-bueller-replica-ferrari-sold/
http://images1.makefive.com/images/200929/1d7a0179dd917396.jpg
so how much is a real one worth.the film used a custom built replica that was drivable as it was too expensive to use a real one, and i believe the one that reversed through the garage was a very basic replica (rough shell on a similar sized chassis)
pretty sure thay didnt kill a real one in the film. :o
Let's hope the driver was insured, because there is no lawful reason to road test a car either before or after an mot test.