Omega Owners Forum
Chat Area => General Discussion Area => Topic started by: Vamps on 03 June 2010, 21:52:16
-
What have I missed :D :D :D
Now, who could have upset him.... ::) ::) ::)
Or is he just waiting for a comeback... :)
-
See his explanation in the chinese takeaway thread :y
-
See his explanation in the chinese takeaway thread :y
Going for a look, thanks James..... :)
-
:-? :-? :-?
STMO not again :(
I hope I didnt say anything wrong .. :-/
so come baaaack.. :y :y :y
-
Yep, threw the towel in earlier today.A shame really,
I will miss himi will have no-one to take the p1$$ out of now. :(
-
He has probably gone to join KW ::) ::)
He'll be back though :D :D
-
I'll miss him too! :( I never got near winning an argument with him, he was too quick witted for me, but then aren't all Scousers born that way? Salt of the Earth! Come back STMO!!!! ;) :y
-
I'll miss him too! :( I never got near winning an argument with him, he was too quick witted for me, but then aren't all Scousers born that way? Salt of the Earth! Come back STMO!!!! ;) :y
not only for you, for many ;D
-
I assumed he created Steve 1564 before he ditched his old persona.
He was getting suspiciously nice recently and wonder if he's been on the Damascus Road! ;D ;D ;D
-
must be having a bad day :-/
-
I assumed he created Steve 1564 before he ditched his old persona.
He was getting suspiciously nice recently and wonder if he's been on the Damascus Road! ;D ;D ;D
Yes you are right. :y :y I had noticed that and it worried me! :o :o :o ;) ;)
-
I assumed he created Steve 1564 before he ditched his old persona.
He was getting suspiciously nice recently and wonder if he's been on the Damascus Road! ;D ;D ;D
[/highlight]
Nah!! STMO would have nipped down the nearest back alley to avoid all the fuss, he isn't the type to just 'Pass by on the other side' ;D ;)
-
I assumed he created Steve 1564 before he ditched his old persona.
He was getting suspiciously nice recently and wonder if he's been on the Damascus Road! ;D ;D ;D
[/highlight]
Nah!! STMO would have nipped down the nearest back alley to avoid all the fuss, he isn't the type to just 'Pass by on the other side' ;D ;)
Oops. Wrong story. :D
-
Just shows what an UnGodly Heathen I am! :-[
-
The Damascus Road involved bright lights and a set of scales.... but no drugs were found. :D
-
Thank you James for pointing me in that direction, I had assumed it to be a Joke thread so passed it over, as I often do rather than getting offended. :)
-
I hope he comes back, it's by no means guaranteed :-[
He's by far the funniest fella on here, Love his sense of humour. It's going to be a bit more boring around here if he stays away... :( :(
Jon
-
He has probably gone to join KW ::) ::)
He'll be back though :D :D
KW is still online isnt he, just a different user name. 8-)
-
I've just tried to reply to the PM he sent me.....not possible :-/.........very funny PM by the way Steve... ;) ;)
-
is there a naughty step somewhere we dont know about?
-
I am saddened by Steve's departure, but I nearly quit myself in the last few days, so I can't say I am too surprised.
It's not a problem with OOF, per se. This forum mirrors society and it will wax and wane accordingly.
There is a lot of anger beneath the surface in this country and we have become deeply polarised. OOF merely reflects that situation, as witnessed by the replies to the Chinese takeaway thread.
Albs mentioned the global warming threads (many of which I started) and seemed to suggest that these were off-putting to members. I have not posted on that subject for a long time, but apologise if I caused any "damage" to the forum.
The supposed broken OOF (it's not "broken", IMHO) could easily be fixed by banning all jokes and threads about politics, environmentalism and religion.
We could all post about X-Factor instead. ;)
Would I still remain a member?
Probably not. :(
-
I am saddened by Steve's departure, but I nearly quit myself in the last few days, so I can't say I am too surprised.
It's not a problem with OOF, per se. This forum mirrors society and it will wax and wane accordingly.
There is a lot of anger beneath the surface in this country and we have become deeply polarised. OOF merely reflects that situation, as witnessed by the replies to the Chinese takeaway thread.
Albs mentioned the global warming threads (many of which I started) and seemed to suggest that these were off-putting to members. I have not posted on that subject for a long time, but apologise if I caused any "damage" to the forum.
The supposed broken OOF (it's not "broken", IMHO) could easily be fixed by banning all jokes and threads about politics, environmentalism and religion.
We could all post about X-Factor instead. ;)
Would I still remain a member?
Probably not. :(
Nick, Your threads have a lot of interest to some and not others, but thats no need to stop posting them.
Politics, global warming and busses have all developed long threads, If I have no interest in them then I bypass, but I certainly dont want you or others to stop posting them.
These are issues that people feel strongly about and as the group heading says General Chat that there you go.
We chat, debate and argue over a lot of things, they wont suit everyone, but if those with no genuine reason to post left others to carry on then the thread will last as long as there is interest.
-
I am saddened by Steve's departure, but I nearly quit myself in the last few days, so I can't say I am too surprised.
It's not a problem with OOF, per se. This forum mirrors society and it will wax and wane accordingly.
There is a lot of anger beneath the surface in this country and we have become deeply polarised. OOF merely reflects that situation, as witnessed by the replies to the Chinese takeaway thread.
Albs mentioned the global warming threads (many of which I started) and seemed to suggest that these were off-putting to members. I have not posted on that subject for a long time, but apologise if I caused any "damage" to the forum.
The supposed broken OOF (it's not "broken", IMHO) could easily be fixed by banning all jokes and threads about politics, environmentalism and religion.
We could all post about X-Factor instead. ;)
Would I still remain a member?
Probably not. :(
Nick, Your threads have a lot of interest to some and not others, but thats no need to stop posting them.
Politics, global warming and buses have all developed long threads, If I have no interest in them then I bypass, but I certainly dont want you or others to stop posting them.
These are issues that people feel strongly about and as the group heading says General Chat that there you go.
We chat, debate and argue over a lot of things, they wont suit everyone, but if those with no genuine reason to post left others to carry on then the thread will last as long as there is interest.
Absolutely, the global warming thread I have little interest in, fine, not a problem, no one forced me to read it..... :)
The bus thread, I popped in and out of as I like old Commercials, could equally have been trucks to me.. :)
I have noticed a change, and not sure why, banter has kept general chat going since I joined, aggressive disagreement is more recent, we are all different and may never agree, but we should be able to agree to disagree without aggressive or offensive replies STMO being the exception ::) but then again why? to a newbie, well............... ::)
-
I am saddened by Steve's departure, but I nearly quit myself in the last few days, so I can't say I am too surprised.
It's not a problem with OOF, per se. This forum mirrors society and it will wax and wane accordingly.
There is a lot of anger beneath the surface in this country and we have become deeply polarised. OOF merely reflects that situation, as witnessed by the replies to the Chinese takeaway thread.
Albs mentioned the global warming threads (many of which I started) and seemed to suggest that these were off-putting to members. I have not posted on that subject for a long time, but apologise if I caused any "damage" to the forum.
The supposed broken OOF (it's not "broken", IMHO) could easily be fixed by banning all jokes and threads about politics, environmentalism and religion.
We could all post about X-Factor instead. ;)
Would I still remain a member?
Probably not. :(
Nick, Your threads have a lot of interest to some and not others, but thats no need to stop posting them.
Politics, global warming and buses have all developed long threads, If I have no interest in them then I bypass, but I certainly dont want you or others to stop posting them.
These are issues that people feel strongly about and as the group heading says General Chat that there you go.
We chat, debate and argue over a lot of things, they wont suit everyone, but if those with no genuine reason to post left others to carry on then the thread will last as long as there is interest.
Absolutely, the global warming thread I have little interest in, fine, not a problem, no one forced me to read it..... :)
The bus thread, I popped in and out of as I like old Commercials, could equally have been trucks to me.. :)
I have noticed a change, and not sure why, banter has kept general chat going since I joined, aggressive disagreement is more recent, we are all different and may never agree, but we should be able to agree to disagree without aggressive or offensive replies STMO being the exception ::) but then again why? to a newbie, well............... ::)
second that..
(dont have the merit badges to be offrensive to newbies yet)
-
I assumed he created Steve 1564 before he ditched his old persona.
He was getting suspiciously nice recently and wonder if he's been on the Damascus Road! ;D ;D ;D
Nah, my old mate stevie is far too nice for that.............
(hey you old t*sser, I'm defending you......I still want a bigger telly...............!!)
-
I am saddened by Steve's departure, but I nearly quit myself in the last few days, so I can't say I am too surprised.
It's not a problem with OOF, per se. This forum mirrors society and it will wax and wane accordingly.
There is a lot of anger beneath the surface in this country and we have become deeply polarised. OOF merely reflects that situation, as witnessed by the replies to the Chinese takeaway thread.
Albs mentioned the global warming threads (many of which I started) and seemed to suggest that these were off-putting to members. I have not posted on that subject for a long time, but apologise if I caused any "damage" to the forum.
The supposed broken OOF (it's not "broken", IMHO) could easily be fixed by banning all jokes and threads about politics, environmentalism and religion.
We could all post about X-Factor instead. ;)
Would I still remain a member?
Probably not. :(
Nick,I think I might not have explained my point very well. I was told by 2 or 3 members in recent months that they were fed up with all the threads about global warming. As you know I was a keen (if not particularily knowledgeable)contributor to the threads myself, so wasnt in any way having a dig.
I was making the point that maybe it was a bit of a red herring as the global warming (and political threads in general) have decreased greatly recently, but those people still arent bothering with gen. discussion.
I take the same view as some others, if I am not interested in the subject I dont read the thread. :y.......This is why I said in another post that I would like the people who dont bother with gen. discussion these days to say why they dont. It might make it easier to fix the problem if everyone knew what the problem was. ;)
-
I am saddened by Steve's departure, but I nearly quit myself in the last few days, so I can't say I am too surprised.
It's not a problem with OOF, per se. This forum mirrors society and it will wax and wane accordingly.
There is a lot of anger beneath the surface in this country and we have become deeply polarised. OOF merely reflects that situation, as witnessed by the replies to the Chinese takeaway thread.
Albs mentioned the global warming threads (many of which I started) and seemed to suggest that these were off-putting to members. I have not posted on that subject for a long time, but apologise if I caused any "damage" to the forum.
The supposed broken OOF (it's not "broken", IMHO) could easily be fixed by banning all jokes and threads about politics, environmentalism and religion.
We could all post about X-Factor instead. ;)
Would I still remain a member?
Probably not. :(
I wasn't very interested in the global warming thread either, although it was obviously popular with others. I want to say that I was thoroughly pleasantly surprised at the complete change in you as you started the Nag's Head up again. I had you down as a bit of a politics bore, but the Nag's Head, while not having quite the planned effect, was a very refreshing new part of General Discussion and showed your personality well.
Maybe we should have just a single Nag's Head thread instead of starting a new one each day
Jon
-
I am saddened by Steve's departure, but I nearly quit myself in the last few days, so I can't say I am too surprised.
It's not a problem with OOF, per se. This forum mirrors society and it will wax and wane accordingly.
There is a lot of anger beneath the surface in this country and we have become deeply polarised. OOF merely reflects that situation, as witnessed by the replies to the Chinese takeaway thread.
Albs mentioned the global warming threads (many of which I started) and seemed to suggest that these were off-putting to members. I have not posted on that subject for a long time, but apologise if I caused any "damage" to the forum.
The supposed broken OOF (it's not "broken", IMHO) could easily be fixed by banning all jokes and threads about politics, environmentalism and religion.
We could all post about X-Factor instead. ;)
Would I still remain a member?
Probably not. :(
.......to which I would contribute...(ahem ::) ::) I mean....annoy old Nick with an alternative opinion.. ;) ;))
-
I am saddened by Steve's departure, but I nearly quit myself in the last few days, so I can't say I am too surprised.
It's not a problem with OOF, per se. This forum mirrors society and it will wax and wane accordingly.
There is a lot of anger beneath the surface in this country and we have become deeply polarised. OOF merely reflects that situation, as witnessed by the replies to the Chinese takeaway thread.
Albs mentioned the global warming threads (many of which I started) and seemed to suggest that these were off-putting to members. I have not posted on that subject for a long time, but apologise if I caused any "damage" to the forum.
The supposed broken OOF (it's not "broken", IMHO) could easily be fixed by banning all jokes and threads about politics, environmentalism and religion.
We could all post about X-Factor instead. ;)
Would I still remain a member?
Probably not. :(
I wasn't very interested in the global warming thread either, although it was obviously popular with others. I want to say that I was thoroughly pleasantly surprised at the complete change in you as you started the Nag's Head up again. I had you down as a bit of a politics bore, but the Nag's Head, while not having quite the planned effect, was a very refreshing new part of General Discussion and showed your personality well.
Maybe we should have just a single Nag's Head thread instead of starting a new one each day
Jon
I had thought of that, but the problem is that it would become exceedingly long...perhaps. :-/
Certainly the Nag's Head has been fun when it's been open. Maybe we should ask for other comments and suggestions about it. :y
-
Aw take no notice, Esty's just stroppy koz Rafa finally left Liverpool for 4 million, he'll be back, i hope.
-
He has probably gone to join KW ::) ::)
He'll be back though :D :D
KW is still online isnt he, just a different user name. 8-)
-
He has probably gone to join KW ::) ::)
He'll be back though :D :D
KW is still online isnt he, just a different user name. 8-)
Yes is the simple answer to that :D :D :D
-
I'll miss him too! :( I never got near winning an argument with him, he was too quick witted for me, but then aren't all Scousers born that way? Salt of the Earth! Come back STMO!!!! ;) :y
not only for you, for many ;D
He was'nt quick witted just mouthy,rude & annoying. No real input & a lousy taste in cars.
-
I know i dont get on here much but what am i missing peeps leaving K.w and now Stmo whats the score????
-
I'll miss him too! :( I never got near winning an argument with him, he was too quick witted for me, but then aren't all Scousers born that way? Salt of the Earth! Come back STMO!!!! ;) :y
not only for you, for many ;D
He was'nt quick witted just mouthy,rude & annoying. No real input & a lousy taste in cars.
Well said guy.
Oi Steve, pity you cant comment you old fart. ;D ;D ;D
-
I'll miss him too! :( I never got near winning an argument with him, he was too quick witted for me, but then aren't all Scousers born that way? Salt of the Earth! Come back STMO!!!! ;) :y
not only for you, for many ;D
He was'nt quick witted just mouthy,rude & annoying. No real input & a lousy taste in cars.
mouthy , rude and annoying :-?
if he behaved liked that, he tried to reflect you , to show how you are behaving actually ..
I've never seen him behaving like that without a reason.. sometimes makes particular jokes to test you and if you failed thats your problem..
most of his statements were a lesson for me at least..
I wish he'll come back..
-
I'll miss him too! :( I never got near winning an argument with him, he was too quick witted for me, but then aren't all Scousers born that way? Salt of the Earth! Come back STMO!!!! ;) :y
not only for you, for many ;D
He was'nt quick witted just mouthy,rude & annoying. No real input & a lousy taste in cars.
mouthy , rude and annoying :-?
if he behaved liked that, he tried to reflect you , to show how you are behaving actually ..
I've never seen him behaving like that without a reason.. sometimes makes particular jokes to test you and if you failed thats your problem..
most of his statements were a lesson for me at least..
I wish he'll come back..
Nicely put Cem :y
-
I'll miss him too! :( I never got near winning an argument with him, he was too quick witted for me, but then aren't all Scousers born that way? Salt of the Earth! Come back STMO!!!! ;) :y
not only for you, for many ;D
He was'nt quick witted just mouthy,rude & annoying. No real input & a lousy taste in cars.
Who's being mouthy now? >:(
There's no need to slag off other members and, for what it's worth I think that your views do not represent the majority.
Come back, Steve. We need some light-hearted banter. :y
It's getting grim on here. :(
-
Nick,
I think Guys comments represent a larger number on here than you may think
Anyway, he's gone......again
Moving on......
::)
-
i like steve. and i do hope he comes back, i love his humour, he takes the pi$$ out of me, so what! give and take. :y
-
Ear,Ear Richie. :y
-
i like steve. and i do hope he comes back, i love his humour, he takes the pi$$ out of me, so what! give and take. :y
To be honest mate I dont care if he stays or goes....I just wish he would make his mind up..... :y :y
-
This actually is "The Thing" at the minute on here isn't it.....
Guy says his opinion about Steve which Nickbat seems to disagree with... Fair enough but to get arsey about it which someone did in my opinion putting an angry face after their sentence.....Just seems no real point to it in my opinion... :(
I have also never seen Steve but I for one will miss him as He added needed humour to The Forum which alot of you seem to have lost i'm afraid :(
Now this is not pointed at anyone in particular, if you think it is, tough I'm afraid.
-
There does seem to be a lot of sense of humour failure about of late.
It seems that EVERYONE is picking for a fight.
PUT EM UP, PUT EM UP ;D ;D ;D ;D
-
As I said in the other thread.....I like the guy :-* :-* :-* :-*.and he likes me.. :-* :-* :-*.
-
I must admit when i posted the said comment it crossed my mind i'm guilty of the same at times. Fair go folks.
All i can say in my defence is i do get involved, attend meets, post stuff as well as be rude at times. Difference is being rude is all i ever remember him doing...that was it. I'd still be happy if he wanted to re join though, no real harm done.