Omega Owners Forum

Chat Area => General Discussion Area => Topic started by: Nickbat on 31 January 2011, 23:43:10

Title: Lockerbie bomber's release
Post by: Nickbat on 31 January 2011, 23:43:10
Ministers secretly advised Muammar Gaddafi’s Libyan regime how to secure the successful early release of the Lockerbie bomber, documents obtained by The Daily Telegraph have disclosed.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/wikileaks/8294120/WikiLeaks-Britain-secretly-advised-Libya-how-to-secure-release-of-Lockerbie-bomber.html

Ouch! :o :o :o :o >:(
Title: Re: Lockerbie bomber's release
Post by: albitz on 01 February 2011, 01:07:24
Thats dynamite. It should result in the people involved ending up in the dock. Perverting the course of justice or similar ? It wont happen though. The new establishment is more crooked than the old lot ever were. >:(
Title: Re: Lockerbie bomber's release
Post by: Banjax on 01 February 2011, 07:36:24
I don't know...wouldn't lawyers acting on behalf of al-Megrahi find this stuff out anyway? Its probably the done thing in diplomatic circles.........especially if the defendants home country has shedloads of oil  :y
Title: Re: Lockerbie bomber's release
Post by: bigboykarl on 01 February 2011, 07:38:17
shouldn't he be dead...in aug 2009 he had 3 months to live...
Title: Re: Lockerbie bomber's release
Post by: henryd on 01 February 2011, 11:22:02
Quote
shouldn't he be dead...in aug 2009 he had 3 months to live...

obviously health care/treatment in libya is much better than here >:(
Title: Re: Lockerbie bomber's release
Post by: albitz on 01 February 2011, 12:22:11
Unsurprisingly, I cant find anything about this story oon the BBC news website. Its headlines everywhere else. ::)
Title: Re: Lockerbie bomber's release
Post by: Mysteryman on 01 February 2011, 18:09:25
Quote
Thats dynamite. It should result in the people involved ending up in the dock. Perverting the course of justice or similar ? It wont happen though. The new establishment is more crooked than the old lot ever were. >:(

Dynamite? Nah. Don't you watch 'Spooks' Albs? This kind of thing happens all the time. :-?
Title: Re: Lockerbie bomber's release
Post by: Lizzie_Zoom on 01 February 2011, 18:46:13
Quote
Unsurprisingly, I cant find anything about this story oon the BBC news website. Its headlines everywhere else. ::)


Try this:

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-scotland-12336507

 ;)
Title: Re: Lockerbie bomber's release
Post by: Banjax on 01 February 2011, 18:50:02
Quote
Quote
Unsurprisingly, I cant find anything about this story oon the BBC news website. Its headlines everywhere else. ::)


Try this:

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-scotland-12336507

 ;)

I dont think Albs was having a go at the beeb - i think it was a cry for help Liz  ;)
Title: Re: Lockerbie bomber's release
Post by: Lizzie_Zoom on 01 February 2011, 18:52:52
Quote
Quote
Quote
Unsurprisingly, I cant find anything about this story oon the BBC news website. Its headlines everywhere else. ::)


Try this:

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-scotland-12336507

 ;)

I dont think Albs was having a go at the beeb - i think it was a cry for help Liz  ;)


Ah yes BJ! :D :D :D

Well he should have looked North of the border! ;D ;D ;D ;D
Title: Re: Lockerbie bomber's release
Post by: Banjax on 01 February 2011, 18:59:13
Quote
Quote
Quote
Quote
Unsurprisingly, I cant find anything about this story oon the BBC news website. Its headlines everywhere else. ::)


Try this:

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-scotland-12336507

 ;)

I dont think Albs was having a go at the beeb - i think it was a cry for help Liz  ;)


Ah yes BJ! :D :D :D

Well he should have looked North of the border! ;D ;D ;D ;D


can you get BBC Scotland on the internet that far south? Shouldnt you pay extra or something?  ;) :y
Title: Re: Lockerbie bomber's release
Post by: albitz on 01 February 2011, 19:00:38
That wasnt there at 1220pm Lizzie. Every other news site had the story displayed very prominently indeed. ;)

content edited to save the admins a headache. I apoligise for my lack of restraint. I can usually deal with people being smug, I can usually deal with people being stupid. Some days I just cant deal with someone who is both. ;)
Title: Re: Lockerbie bomber's release
Post by: Lizzie_Zoom on 01 February 2011, 19:28:51
Quote
Quote
Quote
Quote
Quote
Unsurprisingly, I cant find anything about this story oon the BBC news website. Its headlines everywhere else. ::)


Try this:

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-scotland-12336507

 ;)

I dont think Albs was having a go at the beeb - i think it was a cry for help Liz  ;)


Ah yes BJ! :D :D :D

Well he should have looked North of the border! ;D ;D ;D ;D


can you get BBC Scotland on the internet that far south? Shouldnt you pay extra or something?  ;) :y


No, you should pay me for lowering myself that far.  Scottish BBC indeed!  Very contradictory!  There is only one BBC and it is English! ::) ::) ::) ::) ::)



 ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;)
Title: Re: Lockerbie bomber's release
Post by: Lizzie_Zoom on 01 February 2011, 19:30:46
Quote
That wasnt there at 1220pm Lizzie. Every other news site had the story displayed very prominently indeed. ;)

content edited to save the admins a headache. I apoligise for my lack of restraint. I can usually deal with people being smug, I can usually deal with people being stupid. Some days I just cant deal with someone who is both. ;)

What Albs? :o :o :o  Are you trying to say something? :-/ :-/ :-/ :D :D ;)
Title: Re: Lockerbie bomber's release
Post by: Mysteryman on 01 February 2011, 19:32:59
Quote
Quote
That wasnt there at 1220pm Lizzie. Every other news site had the story displayed very prominently indeed. ;)

content edited to save the admins a headache. I apoligise for my lack of restraint. I can usually deal with people being smug, I can usually deal with people being stupid. Some days I just cant deal with someone who is both. ;)

What Albs? :o :o :o  Are you trying to say something? :-/ :-/ :-/ :D :D ;)


Obvious innit? He's saying you're smug and stupid. I wouldn't have it myself.
Title: Re: Lockerbie bomber's release
Post by: Lizzie_Zoom on 01 February 2011, 19:35:52
Quote
Quote
Quote
That wasnt there at 1220pm Lizzie. Every other news site had the story displayed very prominently indeed. ;)

content edited to save the admins a headache. I apoligise for my lack of restraint. I can usually deal with people being smug, I can usually deal with people being stupid. Some days I just cant deal with someone who is both. ;)

What Albs? :o :o :o  Are you trying to say something? :-/ :-/ :-/ :D :D ;)


Obvious innit? He's saying you're smug and stupid. I wouldn't have it myself.


Yes Steve that is how I read it! :o :o :o

I am of course neither, and I was only trying to guide Albs to the right site.  Luckily I am in a good mood today, but obviously he isn't!

Fight??!!   No, not worth it Steve! :D :D :D :D :D ;)
Title: Re: Lockerbie bomber's release
Post by: Mysteryman on 01 February 2011, 19:37:57
Quote
Quote
Quote
Quote
That wasnt there at 1220pm Lizzie. Every other news site had the story displayed very prominently indeed. ;)

content edited to save the admins a headache. I apoligise for my lack of restraint. I can usually deal with people being smug, I can usually deal with people being stupid. Some days I just cant deal with someone who is both. ;)

What Albs? :o :o :o  Are you trying to say something? :-/ :-/ :-/ :D :D ;)


Obvious innit? He's saying you're smug and stupid. I wouldn't have it myself.


Yes Steve that is how I read it! :o :o :o

I am of course neither, and I was only trying to guide Albs to the right site.  Luckily I am in a good mood today, but obviously he isn't!

Fight??!!   No, not worth it Steve! :D :D :D :D :D ;)


I would deffo have a fight Lizzie, or else people will think you're a pushover.
Title: Re: Lockerbie bomber's release
Post by: Lizzie_Zoom on 01 February 2011, 19:42:55
Quote
Quote
Quote
Quote
Quote
That wasnt there at 1220pm Lizzie. Every other news site had the story displayed very prominently indeed. ;)

content edited to save the admins a headache. I apoligise for my lack of restraint. I can usually deal with people being smug, I can usually deal with people being stupid. Some days I just cant deal with someone who is both. ;)

What Albs? :o :o :o  Are you trying to say something? :-/ :-/ :-/ :D :D ;)


Obvious innit? He's saying you're smug and stupid. I wouldn't have it myself.


Yes Steve that is how I read it! :o :o :o

I am of course neither, and I was only trying to guide Albs to the right site.  Luckily I am in a good mood today, but obviously he isn't!

Fight??!!   No, not worth it Steve! :D :D :D :D :D ;)


I would deffo have a fight Lizzie, or else people will think you're a pushover.


No I am such a sweet and gentle woman Steve, and besides I do not want to upset the poor overworked admins! ::) ::) ::) :D :D :D :D :D ;)
Title: Re: Lockerbie bomber's release
Post by: albitz on 01 February 2011, 19:47:52
wording of edited content was, for the most part relating to the fact that it is a tad cheeky for someone north of the wall suggesting we in the south of England should "have to pay extra" for something/anything. It hit a raw nerve.
Title: Re: Lockerbie bomber's release
Post by: Lizzie_Zoom on 01 February 2011, 19:50:08
Quote
wording of edited content was, for the most part relating to the fact that it is a tad cheeky for someone north of the wall suggesting we in the south of England should "have to pay extra" for something/anything. It hit a raw nerve.


Do not worry Albs, I think I know you well enough to understand it was not aimed at me, so I thought I would go along with it! ::) ::) ;D ;D ;D ;D

It was that Steve though; he egged me on, as he does.......the rat!! ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;)
Title: Re: Lockerbie bomber's release
Post by: Mysteryman on 01 February 2011, 20:05:45
Quote
wording of edited content was, for the most part relating to the fact that it is a tad cheeky for someone north of the wall suggesting we in the south of England should "have to pay extra" for something/anything. It hit a raw nerve.


Ah...so.....Banjax is smug and stupid. Glad that's sorted. :y
Title: Re: Lockerbie bomber's release
Post by: hotel21 on 01 February 2011, 20:09:28
Folks, the last couple of times this topic was discussed it degenerated into something we do not want on OOF.

Please ensure that we do not, yet again, get into this scenario.

Your assistance is appreciated on this emotive subject.....   :y
Title: Re: Lockerbie bomber's release
Post by: Mysteryman on 01 February 2011, 20:12:19
Quote
Folks, the last couple of times this topic was discussed it degenerated into something we do not want on OOF.

Please ensure that we do not, yet again, get into this scenario.

Your assistance is appreciated on this emotive subject.....   :y


You're 'north of the wall' Broocie. He was callin yer names mate. ;D
Title: Re: Lockerbie bomber's release
Post by: hotel21 on 01 February 2011, 20:17:19
Quote
Quote
Folks, the last couple of times this topic was discussed it degenerated into something we do not want on OOF.

Please ensure that we do not, yet again, get into this scenario.

Your assistance is appreciated on this emotive subject.....   :y


You're 'north of the wall' Broocie. He was callin yer names mate. ;D

Don't give a stuff if I'm north/south/east/west of any wall on this subject.   ;D

Point is, the subject matter always seems to hit chords with folks, intended or otherwise, and it all goes Pete Tong thereafter, hence my request for common sense/politeness/understanding....  ;)
Title: Re: Lockerbie bomber's release
Post by: Mysteryman on 01 February 2011, 20:20:11
Quote
Quote
Quote
Folks, the last couple of times this topic was discussed it degenerated into something we do not want on OOF.

Please ensure that we do not, yet again, get into this scenario.

Your assistance is appreciated on this emotive subject.....   :y


You're 'north of the wall' Broocie. He was callin yer names mate. ;D

Don't give a stuff if I'm north/south/east/west of any wall on this subject.   ;D

Point is, the subject matter always seems to hit chords with folks, intended or otherwise, and it all goes Pete Tong thereafter, hence my request for common sense/politeness/understanding....  ;)


I agree totally mate. Heart attacks all round if people don't draw their horns in. I've learned to leave the things I can't change alone, just like they told me at alcoholics anonymous. ;D
Title: Re: Lockerbie bomber's release
Post by: Lizzie_Zoom on 01 February 2011, 21:02:48
Quote
Quote
Quote
Quote
Folks, the last couple of times this topic was discussed it degenerated into something we do not want on OOF.

Please ensure that we do not, yet again, get into this scenario.

Your assistance is appreciated on this emotive subject.....   :y


You're 'north of the wall' Broocie. He was callin yer names mate. ;D

Don't give a stuff if I'm north/south/east/west of any wall on this subject.   ;D

Point is, the subject matter always seems to hit chords with folks, intended or otherwise, and it all goes Pete Tong thereafter, hence my request for common sense/politeness/understanding....  ;)


I agree totally mate. Heart attacks all round if people don't draw their horns in. I've learned to leave the things I can't change alone, just like they told me at alcoholics anonymous. ;D


 ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D Please Steve, never ever change  ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D :y :y
Title: Re: Lockerbie bomber's release
Post by: Banjax on 01 February 2011, 23:47:03
Quote
Quote
wording of edited content was, for the most part relating to the fact that it is a tad cheeky for someone north of the wall suggesting we in the south of England should "have to pay extra" for something/anything. It hit a raw nerve.


Ah...so.....Banjax is smug and stupid. Glad that's sorted. :y

I'm smug - he's stupid  :y