Omega Owners Forum

Chat Area => General Car Chat => Topic started by: cam2502 on 13 December 2009, 13:24:39

Title: toyota celica?
Post by: cam2502 on 13 December 2009, 13:24:39
Friend of mine is considering an x plate celica,1.8 vvti,91k,silver, t&t...£3500.
looks a nice car, has anyone any knowledge of these cars? good and bad points....common faults...does the price seem ok? that kind of thing. tia :y :y
Title: Re: toyota celica?
Post by: Lizzie_Zoom on 13 December 2009, 14:06:56
That price seems very high.

But Toyota's in my experience with a 1989 Carina II that I ran from 150k to 250k, and still going strong, after 19 years on the road, is they are very good for reliability, quality of build, and pure long life!   My carbed 1.6 was still doing 120 mph on the motorway, with the engine needing only basic servicing, and very little loss of oil.  Even the bodywork showed very little signs of rust.  The most expensive maintenance I did on her was replace all the main brake pipes which I bought for £120 and fitted in a few hours.

So although I cannot answer you direct on the Toyota model your friend is interested in, these cars in general are very worth buying for long term use ;) ;) ;)
Title: Re: toyota celica?
Post by: cam2502 on 13 December 2009, 14:11:12
thanks lizzie, appreciate that. :y
anyone else? 
Title: Re: toyota celica?
Post by: rob in gib on 13 December 2009, 20:14:43
The celica like all modern toyota`s are very well built and bloody reliable
The only down point i can remember about the celica is poor vision out the back window  :y
Title: Re: toyota celica?
Post by: TheBoy on 13 December 2009, 20:19:37
Seem to remember that Celicas eat turbos, and electircs aren't great. Not sure if newer ones are as bad.
Title: Re: toyota celica?
Post by: Marks DTM Calib on 13 December 2009, 20:44:11
Turbo trouble and if rear wheel steer.....avoid.

Auto boxes on the imports are a bit rough and they like eating suspecsion components.

Try to avoid the imports, you would be amazed what parts are not standard uk items on the,
Title: Re: toyota celica?
Post by: mars on 14 December 2009, 20:13:29
A mate of mine had a Celica GT4 and redlined it most days of the week and the engine never broke. Only thing I recall it having was a clutch which was very expensive ::)
Title: Re: toyota celica?
Post by: Omega3 on 14 December 2009, 21:22:45
Had two Toyotas. Both bomb proof even though red lined every day I had them. Uncanny feeling of being attached to horizon by huge elastic band.
No faults. Total reliability. Only normal service items. First one I had did 160K on original discs & exhaust and was still going strong when i sold it. (Wish I'd kept it) Auto boxes advanced. When I look back Main dealer servicing expensive though, but standards high.
Embarrasingly my friends 20 year old Carina sounds better and runs smoother than my 2.2 Omega. (vauxhall told me engine noise was "normal for that model @ 10,000 miles :-?)
As others have already said, I would avoid imports even if very cheap as surprising amount of parts different and often difficult to source. Insurance more expensive. Service history in japanese and almost impossible to confirm. Resale more difficult.
Celica you mention looks superb on the right rims, only drawback if pushing on is front wheel drive. Engine is sweet though, jointly developed with Yamaha.
Title: Re: toyota celica?
Post by: jerry on 14 December 2009, 22:06:19
Have an L reg toyota estima import and one  of best buys ever had. A lad at work has just got a celica. IMO a fairly nice looking car with OK performance and Toyota reliability and reasonable mpg. There isnt much room in the back mind! When I first got the Prelude I also looked at the Celica but GT4 aside the Honda vtec won hands down on performance. Only problem Ive heard of on them is early corrosion on the alloys. :y
Title: Re: toyota celica?
Post by: jerry on 14 December 2009, 22:18:10
Oh BTW, the Celica does seem to handle quite well. The Prelude was also FWD and although its width helped it was a really well planted car that gripped the road well so wouldnt have any qualms about an FWD "sports" car in that respect (yes I know that everyone favours RWD but we're only talking what 140 bhp here with no vtec/turbo) As for the negativity about"grey imports" I speak from experience when I say that that is 99% bullsh*t stemming from what people like Quentin Wilson have said in the past and dealers/garages trying to screw you out of more money. Like everything else in life its all about knowing where to go and a perusal of forums and mags like "Japanese Performance" should see you right.
Title: Re: toyota celica?
Post by: cam2502 on 14 December 2009, 23:25:05
thanks guys, appreciate all your info and will pass on. brilliant :y :y :y :y :y
Title: Re: toyota celica?
Post by: Martin_1962 on 16 December 2009, 21:54:25
Quote
A mate of mine had a Celica GT4 and redlined it most days of the week and the engine never broke. Only thing I recall it having was a clutch which was very expensive ::)

I used to redline my 2.0 Omega and that never broke.

Towing on the A30 through Devon and Cornwall red line at 70 in second that is hard on it - it survived OK
Title: Re: toyota celica?
Post by: Martin_1962 on 16 December 2009, 21:55:13
A friend had a Celica - it was nice looking, another had an older RWD one
Title: Re: toyota celica?
Post by: mathewst on 17 December 2009, 10:09:18
Forget the Celica, buy a Calibra and upgrade the suspension :y
Title: Re: toyota celica?
Post by: Bent valve on 17 December 2009, 18:57:07

My wife has had a couple of Celicas, both early nineties models and they were superb mechanicaly, the bodies less so. But they are definetley womens or hairdressers cars ;D
Title: Re: toyota celica?
Post by: Squealey on 20 December 2009, 11:20:01
I had a 2006/56 Corolla Verso with the 1.8VVT-i engine, gearbox was very unreliable, had to be rebuilt 4 or 5 times!!!!

Plus, and I had forgotten about this, when it went for its 90,000 mile service they said they had found a 'small' oil leak (even though it never used any or dripped any), and Toyota did a short engine change under warranty, even though that had run out 30,000 mile previously. Think they may be doing a recall on the quite!!!!

Great car other than that, not as bomb proof as I was expecting though!!!