Omega Owners Forum

Chat Area => General Car Chat => Topic started by: Webby the Bear on 13 September 2010, 22:41:39

Title: ok then folks..... old shape omega or new shape???
Post by: Webby the Bear on 13 September 2010, 22:41:39
another COW (can of worms) from bear  :y :y :y :y :y
Title: Re: ok then folks..... old shape omega or new shape???
Post by: PhilRich on 13 September 2010, 22:56:54
I love the old shape back end & interior but like the facelift front end better  :y
Title: Re: ok then folks..... old shape omega or new shape???
Post by: tidla on 13 September 2010, 23:01:48
i liked the early omega shape. but on reading reviews/ comments was put off by the tin worm aspect.

grown to like the facelift and grey slab interior and door panels although there is in places very slight corrosion issues in weird places?
Title: Re: ok then folks..... old shape omega or new shape???
Post by: unclelicklug on 13 September 2010, 23:02:45
Probably facelift, though I remember seeing one for the first time and thinking what a mess they'd made of the shape...
Title: Re: ok then folks..... old shape omega or new shape???
Post by: PhilRich on 13 September 2010, 23:04:28
It's that bloody awful rubber coating they've stuck on everything in the facelift interior that spoils it for me :(
Title: Re: ok then folks..... old shape omega or new shape???
Post by: Dave Elite on 13 September 2010, 23:06:57
I prefer the facelift.
Title: Re: ok then folks..... old shape omega or new shape???
Post by: Andy B on 13 September 2010, 23:12:42
Quote
I love the old shape back end & interior but like the facelift front end better  :y

A while back there were photo's of a preface lift car with an Astra G facelift front end! Sounds like it would have been your perfect car.  :y  :y  :y  :y
Title: Re: ok then folks..... old shape omega or new shape???
Post by: Smiddy on 13 September 2010, 23:24:33
I prefer the preface lift interior, don't like the look of the centre and wood in the face lift models.

As for the outside I like the look of both  :y
Title: Re: ok then folks..... old shape omega or new shape???
Post by: Ploppy on 14 September 2010, 01:53:10
Like both  :D :y
Title: Re: ok then folks..... old shape omega or new shape???
Post by: Jimbob on 14 September 2010, 07:07:32
prefaceliftt mv6 for me any day of the week  :y
Title: Re: ok then folks..... old shape omega or new shape???
Post by: Welung666 on 14 September 2010, 07:25:54
I like the look of the facelifts but the interior leaves a lot to be desired, far to 'plastic fantastic' for my liking. Pre-facelift all the way for me :y
Title: Re: ok then folks..... old shape omega or new shape???
Post by: Del Boy on 14 September 2010, 08:11:07
Facelift I think looks loads better, much fresher outside, I think the pre-facelift is starting to look dated now. Interior wise again I prefer the facelift, but much prefer the pre-facelift feel inside, facelift feels rather cheap in places, whereas the pre-facelift feels solid.
Title: Re: ok then folks..... old shape omega or new shape???
Post by: feeutfo on 14 September 2010, 08:20:35
Facelift,always, bar the tactile finish, although that would be ok if it didn't scratch off...but I do miss the pre face lift climate "dials", I liked those.
Title: Re: ok then folks..... old shape omega or new shape???
Post by: Sixstring on 14 September 2010, 09:30:27
Defo PFL.....just looks a lot more substantial inside.
Title: Re: ok then folks..... old shape omega or new shape???
Post by: humbucker on 14 September 2010, 09:51:59
first omega i drove was a brand new facelift in 2002, thought it was brilliant and it was only a 2.2 i think. then ive owned my minifacelift for over 6 years and i always prefered the refined shape of those, particularly the rear end, as the styling is subtle. ive never been a fan of the facelift rear end, as serek put it "the back lights look like massive brackets". but i do like the front end of the facelift. i have seen some motors where the owners have modded the front end to be a facelift and left the rear end prefacelift, seems to be a great combination.

as for interiors, the facelift is a lot more upto date, although the quality of the laminate on panels leaves a lot to be desired. i like the prefacelift interior too, its far more intuitive i think.

ive just bought a new facelift so maybe i'll reserve judgement til i've got used to it hehe, but in standard form, like for like, id probably go with the prefacelift
Title: Re: ok then folks..... old shape omega or new shape???
Post by: omegod on 14 September 2010, 09:52:34
I have one of each at the moment and the fL interior is awful quality.

My mini FL has had the FL bumper and side strips added along with the front colour coded which I think is the perfect mix of the two. Just my opinion !
Title: Re: ok then folks..... old shape omega or new shape???
Post by: M20LSY on 14 September 2010, 10:17:04
Facelift... all the way! :D
Title: Re: ok then folks..... old shape omega or new shape???
Post by: x1xv45 on 14 September 2010, 10:48:22
Prefer the facelift - the side view is awesome, rear end a bit tidier, as is the interior, but I agree with other  comments about the strange plastics. Facelift front end being a bit longer and pointier is maybe why the bumpers are often scuffed.
Title: Re: ok then folks..... old shape omega or new shape???
Post by: pscocoa on 14 September 2010, 13:06:12
facelift particularly with the irmscher kit
Title: Re: ok then folks..... old shape omega or new shape???
Post by: cem_devecioglu on 14 September 2010, 15:18:15
old shape.. any day..
Title: Re: ok then folks..... old shape omega or new shape???
Post by: Webby the Bear on 14 September 2010, 16:37:52
i have new shape. i love the back end but i prefer the front end from the old shape.
Title: Re: ok then folks..... old shape omega or new shape???
Post by: Jinglemaster2 on 14 September 2010, 16:50:22
If the options had been:

Old shape, new shape or a proper car....... I could have answered.
Title: Re: ok then folks..... old shape omega or new shape???
Post by: Elite Pete on 14 September 2010, 17:06:35
Mini facelift with face lift side trims ;)
Title: Re: ok then folks..... old shape omega or new shape???
Post by: Andy B on 14 September 2010, 17:54:18
Quote
If the options had been:

Old shape, new shape or a proper car....... I could have answered.

you must have another car as well as the Laguna then   ::) ::)
Title: Re: ok then folks..... old shape omega or new shape???
Post by: TheBoy on 14 September 2010, 20:03:46
I have both on my driveway, both pretty similar spec.  I always jump in the prefacelift ;)
Title: Re: ok then folks..... old shape omega or new shape???
Post by: Broomies Mate on 14 September 2010, 21:20:11
Pre-F/L  :y

Exterior:


The front of the earlier cars look more aggressive.... the F/L model looks like an Astra.

Door mirrors are hideous on the later cars.

Add F/L bump strips and colour code the black parts of the bumper and you have the best look.

I am endeared by the boot of the F/L though, the little crease looks more modern.

Interior:

With the exception of the door-cards, the Pre F/L is infinitely better than the later cars.  What were they thinking?  :(

Title: Re: ok then folks..... old shape omega or new shape???
Post by: Del Boy on 14 September 2010, 21:38:57
Quote
If the options had been:

Old shape, new shape or a proper car....... I could have answered.
A Renault though seriously  :-?

You may say it has needed nothing, but my Omega in 5 years cost me, an exhaust, 2 sets of pads & discs, cambelt, aux belt and rocker cover gaskets, a water pump in keeping with cambelt etc, an alternator, an ABS ECU and a battery. Now half of that list is normal wear & tear on a car, so Omega's bad, I think not. As with your Renault obviously, you get your good one and bad ones.

 :y
Title: Re: ok then folks..... old shape omega or new shape???
Post by: Webby the Bear on 14 September 2010, 21:58:34
Quote
If the options had been:

Old shape, new shape or a proper car....... I could have answered.
A Renault though seriously 

You may say it has needed nothing, but my Omega in 5 years cost me, an exhaust, 2 sets of pads & discs, cambelt, aux belt and rocker cover gaskets, a water pump in keeping with cambelt etc, an alternator, an ABS ECU and a battery. Now half of that list is normal wear & tear on a car, so Omega's bad, I think not. As with your Renault obviously, you get your good one and bad ones.

 

i think there are good and bad examples of all cars. i have spoken to loads of people (not on this site) and they have nothing but praise for the omega. reliable, comfy, good performance, engine great etc etc but it sounds like u may have got a 'bad 'un'. :( my point is i think thats rare  :)
Title: Re: ok then folks..... old shape omega or new shape???
Post by: Webby the Bear on 14 September 2010, 22:01:24
by the way del boy, your notes say you drive a bmw but u got a pic of a merc. is that the amg c-class??? is it yours? if so cud u tell me if its any good? i love that AMG c-class ;)
Title: Re: ok then folks..... old shape omega or new shape???
Post by: Del Boy on 14 September 2010, 22:03:52
Quote
by the way del boy, your notes say you drive a bmw but u got a pic of a merc. is that the amg c-class??? is it yours? if so cud u tell me if its any good? i love that AMG c-class ;)
Yes mate, have a '56' 5 series BMW and an '09' Mercedes C220 CDi AMG sport, plenty of other things lurking at the moment too, but they're the most commonly driven the others are bought to be sold instantly. I'll give you the link to the pictures  :y
Title: Re: ok then folks..... old shape omega or new shape???
Post by: Del Boy on 14 September 2010, 22:06:01
http://www.omegaowners.com/forum/YaBB.pl?num=1277850163

It's a fantastic car too  :y
Title: Re: ok then folks..... old shape omega or new shape???
Post by: The Red Baron on 14 September 2010, 22:11:32
deffo the mini face for me. i do like the rear end of the facelift estate but not the saloon. i think pete has the right idea though, facelift side strips on the mini face do look good. :y
the f/l interior i think is crap. [smiley=thumbdown.gif]
Title: Re: ok then folks..... old shape omega or new shape???
Post by: Vamps on 14 September 2010, 22:19:25
Happy with either from the outside, though prefer the estate to be honest, however preferred the older interior, particularly pre passenger air bag, the top bit was perfect for cassette tapes... :y And the space beside the radio, perfect for you pack of ciggies, our old black estate had all of this, the red one is different inside but not facelift...

Facelift seems to have lots of hidy places but no real space for storage of items in the cabin, not even anywhere to put your sunglasses ::) ::) and those door flaps can't be used when driving as you need your left hand to get anything out.. ::) ::)